¿Desaparece la clase media en México?: Una aplicación de la polarización por subgrupos entre 1984 y 2000.

Huesca, Luis (2004): ¿Desaparece la clase media en México?: Una aplicación de la polarización por subgrupos entre 1984 y 2000.

Abstract

This paper empirically applies the statistical approaches to the phenomenon of polarization generated by Esteban, et al. (1999) and Gradín (2000) in order to quantify the evolution of the middle class in Mexico and the role of various household attributes in the formation of groups during 1984-2000. It is assumed that the formation of extreme groups and the clustering process in every society is determined not only by equivalent income, but also by socioeconomic characteristics of the household. Micro-data of the National Survey of Household Income and Expenditure (ENIGH) is used, so that household disposable equivalent income is related to the attributes of the household head. Once the social groups are quantified, an ordered probit model is settled out so influences of characteristics are attached to them and respective probabilities and marginal effects are obtained. Findings reveal that both a huge gap between poor and rich incomes and the effect that education induces to separate the sub-populations groups, lead to increases in polarization engendering a weaker middle class in the distribution. It is also found that a higher effort is required in order to improve household conditions within the Mexican society between 1984 and 2000.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Is the middle class vanishing in Mexico?: An application of polarization by subgroups between 1984 and 2000.
• Language: Spanish
• Keywords: Income distribution; Polarization; Middle class
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C14 - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C25 - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models ; Discrete Regressors ; Proportions ; Probabilities

References

Aguilar, G. (2000), Desigualdad y Pobreza en México ¿Son inevitables?, UNAM, IIEc, IPN, CIECAS, Ed. Porrúa, Febrero, México, 13-203.

Atkinson, A. B. (1970), “On the Measurement of Inequality”, Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 244-63.

Cowell, F. (1988), “Sampling Variance and Decomposable Inequality Measures”, Journal of Econometrics, 42, pp. 27-41.

Chakravarty, S. R. and A. Majumder (2001), “Inequality, Polarisation and Welfare: theory and Applications”, Australian Economic Papers, 40, March, 1-13.

Duclos, Jean-Yves, and Magda Mercader (1999), “Household needs and Poverty: With application to Spain and the U.K.” Review of Income and Wealth, Series 45, (1), March 1999, 77-98.

Esteban, Joan Maria (1996), “Desigualdad y polarización. Una aplicación a la distribución interprovincial de la renta en España”, Revista de Economía Aplicada, Núm. 11, vol. IV, 5-26.

Esteban, Joan Maria and Debraj Ray (1994), “On the Measurement of Polarization”, Econometrica, 62, 819-52.

Esteban, Joan Maria, Carlos Gradín and Debraj Ray (1999), “Extensions of a Measure of Polarization, with an Application to the Income Distribution of Five OECD Countries”, Luxembourg Income Study, Working Paper Series, 218, Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse, New York, Syracuse University.

Gradín, Carlos (2002), “Polarization and Inequality in Spain: 1973-91”, Journal of Income Distribution, Vol. 11 (1), 34-52.

Gradín, Carlos (2000) “Polarization by Sub-populations in Spain: 1973-91”, Review of Income and Wealth, December, Series 46, (4), 457-74.

Gradín, Carlos (1999), “Polarization and Inequality: An International Comparison”, en Essays on Polarization Measurement, unpublished doctoral thesis, Departamento de Economía e Historia Económica, Universidad, Autónoma de Barcelona, 46-68.

Gradín, Carlos and Máximo Rossi (2000), “Polarización y desigualdad salarial en Uruguay, 1986-1997”, El Trimestre Económico, 267, Vol. LXVII (3), 421-43.

Gradín, Carlos and Máximo Rossi (2001), “Income Distribution in Uruguay: The Effects of Economic and Institutional Reforms”, Documento de Trabajo 3/01, Departamento de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.

Hernández, E. and Velásquez, J. (2003), Globalización, desigualdad y pobreza. Lecciones de la experiencia mexicana. 1ª edición, UAM-Iztapalapa, Ed. Plaza y Valdéz, 13-217.

INEGI, (1992, 1994, 2000 y 2002), Bases de Datos, Encuestas Nacionales de Ingresos y Gastos de los Hogares, 84-89, 1992-1998 y 2000, México.

Jenkins, Stephen (1996), “Recent trends in the UK income distribution: What happened and why?”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 12(1), 29-46.

Jenkins, Stephen (1995), “Did the middle class shrink during the 1980s? UK evidence from kernel density estimates”, Economics letters, (49), 407-413.

Lustig, Nora (1999), “Pobreza y Desigualdad: un desafío que perdura” Revista de la CEPAL, número extraordinario, CEPAL 50 años, Chile, 1999.

Pánuco H. -Laguette and Székely, Miguel (1997), “La distribución del ingreso y la pobreza en México”, en Bulmer-Thomas Victor (Comp), El Nuevo modelo Económico en América Latina, FCE, México, 225-266.

Paraje, Guillermo (2001), “Inequality and Polarisation in the Great Buenos Aires, 1986-1999”, Presented in The XVIII Latin American Meeting of The Econometric Society, Buenos Aires, Argentina, University of Cambridge, 1-44.

Quah, Danny T. (1997), “Empirics for Growth and Distribution: Stratification, Polarization and Convergence Clubs”, Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 2, 27-59.

Shorrocks, Anthony (1980) “The class of additively decomposable inequality measures”, Econometrica, 48(3), 886-902.

Székely, Miguel (1994), “Estabilización y ajuste con desigualdad y pobreza”, El Trimestre Económico, Vol. XLI (1), Núm. 241, México, enero-marzo 1994, 135-175.

Wang, Y. and Tsui, K. (2000), “Polarization orderings and new classes of polarization indices”, Journal of Public Economic Theory, 283), 349-63.

Wolfson, Michael (1994), “When Inequalities Diverge”, American Economic Review, 84, 2, 353-58.

Wolfson, Michael (1997), “Divergent Inequalities: Theory and Empirical Results”, Review of Income and Wealth, 43, 4, 401-21.

Zhang, X. and R. Kanbur (2001), “What Difference Do Polarization Measures Make? An Application to China”, Journal of Development Studies, 37(3), 85-98.