Gumbau-Albert, Mercedes and Maudos, Joaquin (2009): Patents, technological inputs and spillovers among regions. Published in: Applied Economics , Vol. 41, No. 12 (2009): pp. 1473-1486.
Download (217kB) | Preview
This paper analyses the importance of different technological inputs (R&D and human capital) and different spillovers in explaining the differences in patenting among Spanish regions in the period 1986-2003. The analysis is based on the estimation of a knowledge production function. A region’s own R&D activities and human capital are observed to have a positive significant effect on innovation output, measured by the number of patents. R&D spillovers weighted by the distance and the volume of trade flows between regions cause positive effects on a region’s patents. However, distance matters more than the intensity of trade flows and the R&D spillover effects between regions are bounded: spillovers from closer regions perform better than spillovers from distant regions. On the opposite side, human capital spillovers do not cause any effect outside the region itself.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Patents, technological inputs and spillovers among regions|
|Keywords:||patents, R&D, human capital, spillovers|
|Subjects:||O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O18 - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis ; Housing ; Infrastructure
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
|Depositing User:||Joaquin Maudos|
|Date Deposited:||17. May 2009 00:25|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 00:13|
Acs, Z., Anselin, L., Varga, A. 2002. Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of knowledge. Research Policy 31, 1069-1083
Almeida, P., Kogut, B. 1999. The localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers. Management Science 45, 905-917.
Anselin, L., Varga, A., Acs, Z. 1997. Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Journal of Urban Economics 42, 422-448.
Audretsch, D., Feldman, M. 1996. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review 86, 641-652.
Autant-Bernard, C. (2001), Science and knowledge flows: Evidence from the French case, Research Policy 30, 1069-1078
Baptista, R. and Swan, P. 1999. A comparison of clustering dynamics in the US and UK computer industries. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 9, 373-399.
Barro, R.J., Lee, J.W. 1994. Sources economic growth, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 40, 1-46.
Basberg, B.L. 1987. Patents and the measurement of technological change: a survey of the literature. Research Policy 16, 131-141.
Bayoumi, T., Coe, D., Helpman, E. (1999). R&D spillovers and global growth. Journal of International Economics 47, 399-428.
Bernstein, J., Mohnen, P. 1998. International R&D spillovers between US and Japanese R&D intensive sectors. Journal of International Economics 44, 315-338.
Black, S., Lynch, L. 1996. Human capital investments and productivity, American Economic Review 86, 263-268.
Blundell, R., Grifith, R., Windmeijer, F. 2002. Individual effects and dynamics in count data models. Journal of Econometrics 108(1), 113-131.
Borenzstein, E., De Gregorio, Lee, J.W. 1998. How does FDI affect economic growth. Journal of International Economics 45, 115-135.
Bottazzi, L., Peri, G. 2003. Innovation and spillovers in regions: evidence from European patent data. European Economic Review 47, 687-710.
Bourdieu, D. 1986. The forms of capital. In Richardson, J. Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. New York: Greenwood.
Cannon, E. 2000. Human capital: level versus growth effects. Oxford Economic Papers 52, 670-677.
Carlino, G.A. 2001. Knowledge spillovers: cities’ role in the new economy. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Business Review Q4, 17-23
Cheng, J. and Yang, C. (2005) “Technological knowledge, spillover and productivity: evidence form Taiwanese firm level panel data”, Applied Economics 37, 2361-2371.
Chunag, Y. and Hsu, P. (2004) “FDI, trade and spillover efficiency: evidence from China’s manufacturing sector”, Applied Economics 36, 1103-1115.
Ciccone, A., Hall, R. 1996. Productivity and the density of economic activity. American Economic Review 86(1), 54-70.
Cincera, M. 1997. Patents, R&D, and Technological Spillovers at the Firm Level: Some Evidence from Econometric Count Models for Panel Data. Journal of Applied Econometrics 12, 265-80.
Coe, D., Helpman, E. 1995. International R&D spillovers. European Economic Review 39, 859-887.
Coe, D., Helpman, E., Hoffmaister, A. 1997. North-South R&D Spillovers. Economic Journal vol. 107(440), 134-49.
Cohen, W., Levinthal, D. 1989. Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. Economic Journal 99, 369-596.
Eaton, S., Kortum, S. 1999. International Technology Diffusion: theory and measurement. International Economic Review 40, 537-570.
Engelbretch, H. J. 1997. International R&D spillovers, human capital and productivity in OCDE economies: an empirical investigation. European Economic Review 41(8), 1479-88.
Engelbretch, H. J. 2002. Human capital and international knowledge spillovers in TFP growth of a sample of developing countries: an exploration of alternative approaches. Applied Economics 34, 831-841.
Feldman, M. 2000. Location and innovation: the new economic geography of innovation, spillovers and agglomeration. In The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press.
Fritsch, M., Franke, G. 2004. Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation. Research Policy 33, 245-255.
Glaeser, E,. Kallal, H., Scheinkman, J., Schleifer, A. 1992. Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy 100(6), 1126-1142.
Gradstein, M., Justman, M. 2000. Human capital, social capital and public schooling. European Economic Review 44, 879-891.
Greene, G. 2000. Econometric Analysis, Prentice Hall International Edition
Griliches, Z. 1984. R&D, patents and productivity. The University of Chicago Press.
Griliches, Z. 1990. Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature 28, 1661-1707.
Grossman, G., Helpman, E. 1994. Protection for sale. American Economic Review 84, 833- 850.
Gumbau, M., Maudos, J. (2006). Technological activity and economic growth in the Spanish regions. The Annals of Regional Science 40(1), 55-80.
Hall, B., Griliches, Z., Hausman, J. 1986. Patents and R&D: is there a lag?. International Economic Review 27, 265-83.
Huilin, L. and Song, Y. (2005) “The interdependence between FDI and R&D: an application of an endogenous switching model to Taiwan’s electronics industry”, Applied Economics 37, 1789-1799.
Jaffe, A. 1986. Technological opportunities and spillovers of R&D: evidence from firms’ patents, profits and market value. American Economic Review 76, 984-1001.
Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R. 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108(3), 577-598.
Johansson, B., Karlsson, C., Stough, R. (eds.). 2001. Theories of endogenous regional growth. Lessons for regional policies, Berlin; Springer-Verlag
Johansson, B., Karlsson, C., Stough, R. (eds). 2002. Regional policies and comparative advantages, Cheltenham, UK; Edward Elgar.
Jones, C. 1995. R&D based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy 103(4), 759-84.
Keller, W. 2002. Geographic localization of international technology diffusion. American Economic Review 92 (1), 120-142
Lichtenberg, F. 1994. Have international differences in educational attainment levels narrowed?. In W.J. Baumol, R.R. Nelson, E.W. Wolff (eds.) Convergence of productivity: cross-national studies and historical evidence, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Lucas, R. 1988. On the mechanism of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics 22, 3-42.
Lumenga-Neso, O., Olarreaga, M., Schiff, M. 2005. On “indirect” trade-related R&D spillovers. European Economic Review 49, 1785-1798.
Martín, C., Moreno, L., Rodríguez, L. 1991. Estimación de la distribución regional de las actividades de I+D. Documento de Trabajo Nº 71/1991. FIES
Mas, M., Pérez, F., Serrano, L., Uriel, E., Soler, A. 2005. Series de capital humano 1964-2004. Fundación Bancaja, Valencia.
Meliciani, V. 2000. “The relationship between R&D, investment and patents: a panel data analysis”, Applied Economics 32, 1429-1437.
Pavitt, K. 1985. Patent statistics as indicators of innovation activities. Scientometrics 7, 77- . Piergiovanni, R., Santarelli, E. 2001. Patents and the geographic localization of R&D spillovers in French manufacturing. Regional Studies 35, 697-702.
Porter, M. 1998. Clusters and the new economics competition. Harvard Business Review Nov.Dec, 77-90.
Romer, P. 1990. Endogenous technical change. Journal of Political Economy 98(5), 71-102.
Rondé, P., Hussler, C. 2005. Innovation in regions: what does really matter?. Research Policy 34, 1150-1172.
Scherer, F.M. 1982. Demand pull and technological innovation: Schmoockler revisited. Journal of Industrial Economics 30, 5-237.
Spence, A.M. 1984. Cost reduction, competition and industry performance. Econometrica 52, 101-121.
Varga, A. 1998a. University research and regional innovation: a spatial econometric analysis of academic technology transfers, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
Varga, A. 1998b. Local Academic knowledge spillovers and the concentration of economic activity. Research Paper, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University.
Varga, A. 2000. Universities in local innovation systems. In Acs, Z. (ed.) Regional Innovation, Knowledge and global change, Pinter, New York.
Verspagen, B. 1991. A new empirical approach to catching up or falling behind. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 2 (2), 359-80
Verspagen, B. 1997. Estimating international technological spillovers using technology flow matrices. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 133, 226-248