Staehr, Karsten and Tamazian, Artur and Vadlamannati, Krishna Chaitanya (2009): Political Determinants of Economic Reforms in the Post-Communist Transition Countries.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_15960.pdf Download (179kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper examines how political institutions and electoral outcomes have affected the economic reform process in the post-communist transition countries. Panel data estimations on annual data for 26 transition economies from 1992 to 2006 suggest that the institutional structure of the economy has been of importance, at least for the western-most transition countries. Democratisation and a relatively short exposure to communist rule have been conducive to economic reform, while the timing of elections and whether the government commands a majority in parliament appear to have been unimportant. Governments with right-wing ideology have implemented more market-economic reforms than governments with other ideologies. A high development level but also high inflation have proved conducive to reforms, while unemployment has had the opposite effect.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Political Determinants of Economic Reforms in the Post-Communist Transition Countries |
English Title: | Political Determinants of Economic Reforms in the Post-Communist Transition Countries |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Economic reforms, political economy, political institutions, economic development |
Subjects: | P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P21 - Planning, Coordination, and Reform H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government > H11 - Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P26 - Political Economy ; Property Rights |
Item ID: | 15960 |
Depositing User: | Artur Tamazian |
Date Deposited: | 01 Jul 2009 09:03 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 06:00 |
References: | Arellano, M. & Bond, S. (1991): Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations, Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), pp. 277-97. Arellano, M. & Bover, O. (1995): Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error-Components Models, Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), pp. 29-51. Beck, T; Clarke, G.; Groff, A.; Keefer, Ph. & Walsh, P. (2001): New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions, World Bank Economic Review,15(1), pp. 165-176. Biglaiser, G. & Brown, D. S. (2005): The Determinants of Economic Liberalisation in Latin America, Political Research Quarterly, 58, pp. 671-680. Biglaiser, G. & Danis, M. (2002): Privatisation under Democracy versus Authoritarian Rule, Comparative Political Studies, 25(1), pp. 83-102. Biglaiser, G. & DeRouen, K. Jr. (2004): The Expansion of Neo-liberal Economic Reforms in Latin America. International Studies Quarterly, 48(3), pp. 561-578. Blundell, R. & Bond, S. (1998): Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models, Journal of Econometrics, 87, pp. 115-143. Chousa, J. P.; Khan, H. A.; Melikyan, D. & Tamazian, A. (2005): Assessing Institutional Efficiency, Growth and Integration, Emerging Markets Review, 6(1), pp. 69-84. Collier, P. (1998): On the Economic Consequences of Civil War, Oxford Economic Papers, 50(4), pp. 563-573. de Melo, M.; Denizer, C.; Gelb, A. & Tenev, S. (1996): Circumstance and Choice: The Role of Initial Conditions and Policies in Transition Economies, Policy Research Working Paper, 1866, World Bank. de Melo, M.; Denizer, C.; Gelb, A. & Tenev, S. (2001): “Circumstance and Choice: The Role of Initial Conditions and Policies in Transition Economies, World Bank Economic Review, 15(1), pp. 1-31. Deger, S. & Sen, S. (1983): Military Expenditure, Spin-Off and Economic Development, Journal of Development Economics, 13(1-2), pp. 67-83. Dewatripont, M. & Roland, G. (1992): Economic Reform and Dynamic Political Constraints, Review of Economic Studies, 59(4), pp. 703-730. EBRD (2008): Macroeconomic indicators and Structural indicators, Web-based Database (June 2008), http://www.ebrd.com/pubs/econo/6520.htm. Fidrmuc, J. (2003): Economic Reform, Democracy and Growth during Post-Communist Transition, European Journal of Political Economy, 19(3), pp. 583-604. Grossman, H.; Kim, M. (1996): Predation and Accumulation, Journal of Economic Growth, 1(3), pp. 333-350. Haggard, S. & Kaufman, R. (1992): The Politics of Economic Adjustment, Princeton University Press, New Jersey. Haggard, S. & Webb, S.B (1993): What Do We Know about the Political Economy of Economic Policy Reform?, The World Bank Research Observer, 8(2), pp.143-68. Hayo, B. (2004): Public Support for Creating a Market Economy in Eastern Europe, Journal of Comparative Economics, 32(4), pp. 720-744. Hellman, Joel (1998): “Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Transitions”, World Politics, vol. 50, pp. 203-34. Katsoulakos, Y. & Likoyanni, E. (2002): Fiscal and Other Macroeconomic Effects of Privatisation, Working Paper for CEU Project: Privatisation and Financial Market Development, http://www.feem.it/web/activ/_wp.html. Kingstone, P. & Young, J. (2005): Partisanship and Policy Choice: The Difference between Left and Right in Latin America, Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the International Studies Association, Honolulu, March. Klein, L. (2004): The Peace Dividend, Keynote Lecture delivered at Ninth Annual Meeting of LACEA, San José, Costa Rica, November 5th. Kolodko, G. W. (1999): Ten Years of Post socialist Transition: Lessons for Policy Reforms, Macroeconomics and Growth Development, WP No. 2095, World Bank, Washington, DC. Londregan, J. B & Poole, K. T. (1996): Does High Income Promote Democracy?, World Politics, 49, pp. 1-30. Manzetti, L. (1993): The Political Economy of Privatisation through Divestiture in Lesser Developed Economies, Comparative Politics, 25(4), pp. 429-454. Marshall, M. G. & Jaggers, K. (2002): Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2000. College Park: University of Maryland, Accessed from: http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm. Roland, Gerard (2002): “The Political Economy of Transition”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 29-50. Staehr, K. (2006): Linkages between Political and Economic Reforms in Post-Communist Countries, Nordic Journal of Political Economy, 32(2), pp. 113-138. Valve, N. T. (2004): No Pain, No Gain: Market Reform, Unemployment and Politics in Bulgaria, Journal of Comparative Economics, 32(3), pp. 409-425. Wayland, K. (2002): The Political Fate of Market Reform in Latin America, Africa, and Eastern Europe, International Studies Quarterly, 42(4), pp. 645-673. WDI (2007): World Bank (online), http://ddp-ext.worldbank.org/WDI. World Bank (1996): From Plan to Market, World Development Report, Oxford University Press. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/15960 |