Mackiewicz, Michał (2008): Determinants of Cyclicality of Fiscal Surpluses in The OECD Countries.
Download (368kB) | Preview
In this paper we examine factors that make some governments revert to procyclical fiscal policies despite the standard normative prescription being to conduct fiscal policy countercyclically. In order to avoid the pitfalls of the two-step methods previous studies have typically used we used a one-step method with interaction variables. We found robust statistical evidence that procyclical fiscal policies are typically run by countries with weak institutions. There was also some empirical support for a hypothesis that countries that have accumulated a high debt-to-GDP ratio tend to run procyclical fiscal policies, possibly as a result of the financial constraints. We found no evidence that any other variable among the ones suggested in the literature explains the way in which governments react to the business cycle.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Determinants of Cyclicality of Fiscal Surpluses in The OECD Countries|
|English Title:||Determinants of Cyclicality of Fiscal Surpluses in The OECD Countries|
|Keywords:||procyclical fiscal policy, financial constraints, fiscal institutions|
|Subjects:||E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E63 - Comparative or Joint Analysis of Fiscal and Monetary Policy ; Stabilization ; Treasury Policy
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E60 - General
|Depositing User:||Michał Mackiewicz|
|Date Deposited:||05. Jul 2009 19:05|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 09:59|
Alesina, A., Ardagna, S., Perotti, R., Schiantarelli, F., 2002. Fiscal Policy, Profits, and Investment. American Economic Review, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 571-589.
Alesina, A., Tabellini, G. 2005. Why is fiscal policy often procyclical?. NBER Working Paper, no. 11600.
Anderson, T. W., Hsiao, C., 1981. Estimation of Dynamic Models with Error Components. Journal of the American Statistical Association, no. 76, pp. 598-606.
Arellano, M., Bond, S. 1991. Some Tests of Specification of Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. Review of Economic Studies, no. 58, pp. 277-297.
Banca d’Italia 1999, Indicators of Structural Budget Balances, Research Department Public Finance Workshop.
Barro, R. 1979. On the Determination of the Public Debt. Journal of Political Economy, no. 87, pp. 940-947.
Brender, A., Drazen A. 2005. Political budget cycles in new versus established democracies. Journal of Monetary Economics, no. 52, pp. 1271-1295.
Bruno, G.S.F. 2005. Estimation and inference in dynamic unbalanced panel-data models with a small number of individuals. Stata Journal, vol. 5(4), pp. 473-500.
Calderón, C., Duncan, R., Schmidt-Hebbel, K. 2003. The Role of Credibility in the Cyclical Properties of Macroeconomic Policies in Emerging Economies. Central Bank of Chile, Working Paper, No. 237.
Calderón, C., Duncan, R., Schmidt-Hebbel, K. 2004. Institutions and Cyclical Properties of Macroeconomic Policies. Central Bank of Chile, Working Paper, No. 285.
Calderón, C., Schmidt-Hebbel, K. 2003. Macroeconomic policies and performance in Latin America. Journal of International Money and Finance, no. 22, pp. 895–923
Canova, F. 2007. Methods for Applied Macroeconomic Research. Princeton University Press. Princeton, NJ.
Canova, F., Pappa, E. 2005. Does It Cost To Be Virtuous? The macroeconomic Effects of Fiscal Constraints. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, No 11065
Catao, L. A., Sutton, B.W. 2002 ‘Sovereign Defaults: The Role of Volatility. International Monetary Fund Working Paper, 02/149
Drazen, A. 2000, Political Economy in Macroeconomics, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Fatás, A., Mihov, I. 2004. The Case for Restricting Fiscal Policy Discretion. Quarterly Journal of Economics, forthcoming.
Gavin, M., Perotti, R. 1997. Fiscal Policy in Latin America. in NBER Macroeconomics Annual, eds. Bernanke, B., Rotemberg, J., MIT Press, Cambridge.
Gavin, M., Hausmann, R., Perotti, R., Talvi E. 1996. Managing Fiscal Policy in Latin America and the Caribbean: Volatility, Procyclicality, and Limited Creditworthiness. Inter-American Development Bank, Working Paper No 326
Giavazzi, F., Pagano M. 1990. Can Severe Fiscal Contractions Be Expansionary? –Tales of Two Small European Countries. in NBER Macroeconomics Annual, eds. Blanchard, O., Fischer, S., MIT Press, Cambridge.
Gwartney, J., Lawson, R. 2005, Economic Freedom of the World: 2005 Annual Report, The Fraser Institute, Vancouver, data retrieved from www.freetheworld.com.
Henisz, W. 2000. The institutional environment for economic growth. Economics and Politics, no. 12, pp. 1-31.
Judson. R.A., Owen, A.L. 1996, Estimating Dynamic Panel Data Models: A Practical Guide for Macroeconomists, Federal Reserve Board of Governors, January
Judson, R.A., Owen, A.L. 1999. Estimating dynamic panel data models: a guide for macroeconomists. Economics Letters no. 65, pp. 9-15.
Kaminski, G., Reinhart, C., Vegh, C. 2004. When it Rains it Pours: Procyclical Capital Flows and Macroeconomic Policies. NBER Working Paper, no. 10780.
Kaufman, D., Kraay, A., Mastruzzi M., 2005. Governance Matters III: Governance Indicators for 1996-2004. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper.
Lane, P., Tornell, A. 1998. Why Aren’t Latin American Saving Rates Procyclical?. Journal of Development Economics, no. 57, pp. 185-200.
Lane, P. 2003. The Cyclical Behavior of Fiscal Policy: Evidence from the OECD. Journal of Public Economics, no. 87, pp. 2661-2675.
Lucas R., Stokey N., 1983. Optimal Fiscal and Monetary Policy in an Economy without Capital. Journal of Monetary Economics, no. 12.
Nickell S., 1981. Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects. Econometrica, no. 49, pp. 1417-1426.
OECD 2003. Fiscal Stance over the Cycle: the Role of Debt, Institutions, and Budget Constraints. Economic Outlook 74.
Perotti R., 2002. Estimating the Effects if Fiscal Policy in OECD Countries. European Network of Economic Policy Research Institutes, Working Paper, No.15.
Perry, G. 2003. Can Fiscal Rules Help Reduce Macroeconomic Volatility in the Latin America and the Caribbean Region?. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 3080.
Persson, T., Tabellini, G. 2000, Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Persson, T., Tabellini, G. 2005, The Economic Effects of Constitutions, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Talvi, E., Vegh, C. 2000. Tax Base Variability and pro-cyclical Fiscal Policy. NBER Working Paper, No. 7499.
Talvi E., Vegh, C. 2005. Tax Base Variability and Procyclicality of Fiscal Policy. Journal of Development Economics, forthcoming.
Tornell, A., Lane, P.R. 1998. Are windfalls a curse? A non-representative agent model of the current account. Journal of International Economics, no. 44, pp. 83-112.
Tornell, A., Lane, P.R. 1999. Voracity and Growth. American Economic Review, no. 89, pp. 22-46.
United Nations University 2005, World Income Inequality Database, vol. 2.0a, June.
van den Noord, P. 2002. Automatic Stabilizers in the 1990s and beyond. in The Behaviour of Fiscal Authorities, eds. Buti, M., von Hagen, J., Martinez-Mongay C. 2002, Palgrave, Houndmills.
von Hagen, J., Wolff, G. 2004. What Do Deficits Tell Us about Debt: Empirical Evidence on Creative Accounting with Fiscal Rules’ in EMU, Centre for Economic Policy Research, Discussion Paper No. 4759.
Woo, J. 2006. Why Do More Polarized Countries Run More Pro-cyclical Fiscal Policy?. North American Econometric Society Summer Meeting at Minneapolis, June.