Would you accept this job? An evaluation of the decision utility of workers in the for-profit and nonprofit sectors.

Lanfranchi, Joseph and Narcy, Mathieu and Larguem, Makram (2009): Would you accept this job? An evaluation of the decision utility of workers in the for-profit and nonprofit sectors.

Abstract

In this paper, we intend to evaluate the determinants of the decision utility of workers from the for-profit and nonprofit sectors. In our setting, decision utility is the weight assigned by workers to the expected benefits from job offers. For that purpose, we use the methodology of conjoint analysis that collects experimental data on workers’ stated preferences towards hypothetical job offers characterized by ten attributes. Intrinsic motivation of nonprofit workers is investigated by specifically analyzing the influence on decision utility of three of these attributes, namely wages, working time and loyalty from the employer. The results show evidence of motivational differences between the two groups. First, nonprofit workers attain their maximum decision utility at a longer working time, showing superior intrinsic motivation for work. Furthermore, they are ready to abandon a higher percentage of their wage in order to work for another extra hour than for-profit workers as long as the working week is inferior to 33 hours. Finally, our findings show that for-profit workers evaluate more highly job offers with labour contract including explicit clause where higher effort is exchanged for employer’s loyalty. In contrast, nonprofit workers do not obtain higher utility from such a deal. We interpret this result as evidence of their intrinsic motivation. As the nature of the implicit goals pursued in the nonprofit sector provides them with high work morale, they do not obtain any gain in utility from an explicit clause of employer’s loyalty.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: nonprofit workers, intrinsic motivation, conjoint analysis
• Subjects: J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J28 - Safety ; Job Satisfaction ; Related Public Policy; L - Industrial Organization > L3 - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise > L31 - Nonprofit Institutions ; NGOs ; Social Entrepreneurship; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior

References

Ballou J.P. and B.A. Weisbrod. (2003). Managerial rewards and the behavior of for-profit, governmental, and nonprofit organizations: evidence from the hospital industry, Journal of Public Economics. 87: 1895-1920.

Benabou R.J.M. and J. Tirole (2003). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, Review of Economic Studies. 70: 489-520.

Benz M. (2005). Not for the profit but for the satisfaction? Evidence on worker well-being in nonprofit firms, Kyklos. 58: 155-176.

Besley T. and M. Ghatak (2005). Competition and incentives with motivated agents, American Economic Review. 95: 616-636.

Clark A.E. (1997). Job satisfaction and gender: why are women so happy at work?, Labour Economics. 4: 341-372.

Clark A.E. (2005). What Makes a Good Job? Evidence from OECD Countries, in: Bazen, S., Lucifora, C. and Salverda, W (Eds.), Job Quality and Employer Behaviour. Palgrave: 11-30.

Clark A.E. (2009). Work, jobs and well-being across the millennium, in: E. Diener, J. Helliwell, and D. Kahneman (Eds.), International Differences in Well-Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.

Deci E.L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 18: 105-115.

De Varo J. and D.Brookshire (2007). Promotions and Incentives in Nonprofit and For-Profit Organizations, Industrial and Labor Relations Review. 60: 311-339.

Fehr E. and S. Gachter (2002). Do Incentive Contracts Undermine Voluntary Cooperation?, Working Paper No. 34. University of Zurich.

Fehr E. and K. Schmidt (2003). Theories of Fairness and Reciprocity – Evidence and Economic Applications. in M. Dewatripont, L. Hansen and St. Turnovsky (Eds.), Advances in Economics and Econometrics – 8th World Congress, Econometric Society Monographs, Cambridge University Press.

Ferrer-i-Carbonell A. and P. Frijters (2004). How Important is Methodology for the estimates of the determinants of Happiness?, Economic Journal. 114: 641-659.

Ferrer-i-Carbonell A., van Praag B.M.S. and I. Theodossiou (2006). Image and Reality: the Case of Job Satisfaction., Unpublished Mimeo

Frey B.S. (1997). On the relationship between intrinsic and extrinsic work motivation, International Journal of Industrial Organization. 15: 427-439.

Gächter S. and A. Falk. (2002). Work motivation, institutions and performance. in Rami Zwick und Amnon Rapoport (Eds.) Advances in Experimental Business Research. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Gneezy U. and A.Rustichini (2000). Pay enough or don’t pay at all, Quarterly Journal of Economics. 115: 791-810.

Green P.E. (1974). On the design of choice experiments involving multifactor alternatives, Journal of Consumer Research. 5: 103-123.

Kahneman D. Wakker P.P. and R. Sarin (1997). Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility, The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 112: 375-405.

Kahneman D. and A.B. Krueger (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being, Journal of Economic Perspectives. 20: 3-24.

Kahneman D. and R.H. Thaler (2006). Utility Maximization and Experienced Utility, Journal of Economic Perspectives. 20: 221-234.

Kalleberg, A. L. and S. Vaisey (2005). Pathways to a Good Job: Perceived Work Quality among the Machinists in North America, British Journal of Industrial Relations. 43: 431-454.

Kreps D.M. (1997). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives, American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings. 97: 359-364.

Lanfranchi J and M. Narcy (2008, a). Différence de satisfaction dans l’emploi entre secteurs à but lucratif et à but non lucratif : le rôle joué par les caractéristiques d’emploi, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. 79: 323-368.

Lanfranchi J. and M. Narcy (2008, b). Effort et incitations dans les organisations lucratives et non lucratives », in Actualité de l’économie sociale, L’Harmattan: 65-78.

Leete L. (2001). Whither the nonprofit wage differential ? New estimates from the 1990 census, Journal of Labour Economics. 19: 136-170.

Luce R.D. (1959). Individual choice behaviour: a theoretical analysis. New York Wiley.

Manski C. (1977). The structure of random utility models, Theory and Decision. 8:229-254.

McFadden. D. (1973). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour, in P. Zarembka (Ed). Frontiers of Econometrics. New York. Academic Press: 105-142.

McFadden D. (1986). The choice theory approach to market research, Marketing Science. 5: 275-297.

Mirvis P.H. and E.J. Hackett (1983). Work and workforce characteristics in the nonprofit sector, Monthly Labor Review. 106: 3-12.

Mosca M., Musella M. and F. Pactore (2007). Relational Goods, Monitoring and Non-Pecuniary Compensation in the Nonprofit Sector: The Case of the Italian Social Services, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. 78: 57-86.

Narcy M. (2009). Would nonprofit workers accept to earn less? Evidence from France, forthcoming in Applied Economics.

Origo F. and L. Pagani (2009). Flexicurity and Job Satisfaction in Europe: The Importance of Perceived and Actual Job Stability for Well Being at Work, forthcoming in Labour Economics.

Preston. A.E.. (1989). The Nonprofit Worker in a For-profit World, Journal of Labor Economics. 7: 438-463.

Roomkin M.J. and B.A. Weisbrod (1999). Managerial Compensation and Incentives in For-Profit and Nonprofit Hospitals, The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization. 15: 750-781.

Ruhm C.J. and C. Borkoski (2003). Compensation in the Nonprofit Sector, Journal of Human Resources. 38: 992-1021.

Scott A. (2001). Eliciting GPs’ preferences for pecuniary and non-pecuniary job characteristics, Journal of Health Economics. 20: 329-347.

Sousa-Poza A. and A.A. Sousa-Poza (2000). Taking another look at the gender/job satisfaction paradox, Kyklos. 53: 135-152.

Stern S. (2004). Do Scientists Pay to Be Scientists?, Management Science. 50: 835-853.

Thurstone L. (1927). A law of comparative judgement, Psychological Review. 34: 273-286.

Van Beek K.W.H., Koopmans C.C. and B.M.S. Van Praag. 1997. Shopping at the labour market: a real tale of fiction. European Economic Review. 41: 295-317.

Van Praag. B.M.S., Frijters P. and A. Ferrer-i-Carbonell (2002). The Anatomy of Subjective Well-Being, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 51: 29-49.

Van Praag. B.M.S. and A. Ferrer-i-Carbonell (2004). Happiness Quantified. Oxford University Press. Oxford.