Adam, Antonis and Delis, Manthos D and Kammas, Pantelis (2008): Public sector efficiency: Leveling the playing field between OECD countries.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_16493.pdf Download (471kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this paper we seek a robust methodology to measure the relative public spending efficiency of 19 OECD countries over the period 1980-2000. Based on the functional classification of government expenditure, we decompose total public spending into its separate accounts and we employ a semi-parametric method to obtain relative efficiency scores (for the separate accounts as well as for aggregate public spending). The econometric method isolates the impact of government inefficiency from the inefficiency arising from the socioeconomic environment or luck, thus leveling the playing field between the examined countries. The results suggest that the quality of governance is more important than the socioeconomic environment or luck. Finally, we propose a technique to measure the allocative efficiency of public spending, in an effort to proxy the optimal allocation of public funds when the governments set specific targets.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Public sector efficiency: Leveling the playing field between OECD countries |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Public spending; Technical and allocative efficiency; Stochastic DEA |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H50 - General H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government > H11 - Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C14 - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General |
Item ID: | 16493 |
Depositing User: | Manthos Delis |
Date Deposited: | 30 Jul 2009 00:16 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 03:32 |
References: | Afonso, A., St. Aubyn, M., 2005. Non-parametric approaches to education and health: Expenditure efficiency in OECD countries. Journal of Applied Economics 8, 227-246. Afonso, A., Schuknecht, L., Tanzi, V., 2005. Public sector efficiency: An international comparison. Public Choice 123, 321-347. Afonso, A., Schuknecht, L., Tanzi, V., 2006. Public sector efficiency: Evidence for new EU member states and emerging markets. ECB Working Paper, no. 581. Angelopoulos, K., Philippopoulos, A., 2005. The role of government in anti-social redistributive activities. CESifo Working Paper no. 1427. Angelopoulos, K., Philippopoulos, A., Tsionas, E., 2007. Does public sector efficiency matter? Revisiting the relation between fiscal size and economic growth in a world sample. Mimeo. Balaguer-Coll, M.T., Prior, D., Tortosa-Ausina, E., 2007. On the determinants of local government performance: A two-stage nonparametric approach. European Economic Review 51, 425-451. Bradford, D., Malt, R., Oates, W., 1969. The rising cost of local public services, some evidence and reflections. National Tax Journal 22, 185-202. Charnes, C., Cooper, W.W., Lewin, A.Y., Seiford, L.M., 2004. Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications. Springer, New York. Coelli, T., Rao, D.S.P., O'Donnell, C.C., Battese, G.E., 2005. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Springer, New York. Cornwell, C., Schmidt, P, Sickles, R.C., 1990. Production frontiers with cross-sectional and time-series variation in efficiency levels. Journal of Econometrics 46, 185-200. Duncombe, W., Miner, J., Ruggiero, J. 1997. Empirical evaluation of bureaucratic models of inefficiency. Public Choice 93, 1-18. Farrell, M.J., 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 120, 253-281. Fried, H.O., Lovell, C.A.K., Schmidt, S.S., Yaisawarng, S., 2002. Accounting for environmental effects and statistical noise in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis 17, 157-174. Hanushek, E.A., Kimko, D.D., 2000. Schooling, labor-force quality, and the growth of nations. American Economic Review 90, 1184-1208. Herrera, S., Pang, G., 2005. Efficiency of public spending in developing countries: an efficiency frontier approach. Policy Research Working Paper Series 3645, The World Bank. Glass, J.C., McCallion, G., McKillop, D.G., Stringer, K., 2006. A ‘technically level playing-field’ profit efficiency analysis of enforced competition between publicly funded institutions. European Economic Review 50, 1601-1626. Gupta, S., Verhoeven, M., 2001. The efficiency of government expenditure, experiences from Africa. Journal of Policy Modelling 23, 433-467. Kumbhakar, S.C., Lovell, C.A.K., 2000. Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Lee, Y.H., Schmidt, P., 1993. A production frontier model with flexible temporal variation in technical inefficiency. In: Fried, H.O., Lovell, C.A.K., Schmidt, S.S. (Eds.), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications. Oxford University Press, New York. OECD Policy Briefs (various issues). Palda, F., 1997. Fiscal churning and political efficiency. Kyklos 50, 189-206. Quinn, D., 1997. The correlates of change in international financial regulation. American Political Science Review 91, 531-551. Resti, A., 2000. Efficiency measurement of multi-product industries: A comparison of classic and recent techniques based on simulated data. European Journal of Operational Research 121, 559-578. Sijpe, N., Rayp, G., 2007. Measuring and explaining government efficiency in developing countries. Journal of Development Studies 43, 360-381. Tanzi, V., Schuknecht, L., 1998. Can small governments secure economic and social well-being? In: Grubel, H. (Ed.), How to Spend the Fiscal Dividend: What is the Optimal Size of Government? Fraser Institute, Vancouver. Tanzi, V., Schuknecht, L., 2000. Public Spending in the 20th Century: A Global Perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Tulkens, H., 1993. On FDH efficiency analysis: Some methodological issues and applications to retail banking, courts, and urban transit. Journal of Productivity Analysis 4, 183-210. United Nations, 2000. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistics Division, Statistical Papers, Series M, No.84, New York. Zhu, J., 2003. Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking. Springer, New York. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/16493 |