Cuberes, David and Dougan, William (2009): How Endogenous Is Money? Evidence from a New Microeconomic Estimate.
Download (209kB) | Preview
This paper uses microeconomic data on firms’ money demand and investment in physical capital for the period 1983-2006 to estimate the extent to which variation in the U.S. money supply is an endogenous response to variation in firms’ demand for liquidity. We estimate a simple model in which each firm’s desired money balances in any period depend on that firm’s current transactions, current investment, and its planned future investment, as well as aggregate variables such as interest rates and common policy forecasts. Calculations based on our estimates suggest that only a very small fraction of the variability in the aggregate stock of money represents an endogenous response to autonomous changes in firms’ investment plans.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||How Endogenous Is Money? Evidence from a New Microeconomic Estimate|
|Keywords:||Money demand, money supply, endogenous money, monetary neutrality|
|Subjects:||E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E51 - Money Supply ; Credit ; Money Multipliers
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E41 - Demand for Money
|Depositing User:||David Cuberes|
|Date Deposited:||09. Oct 2009 10:46|
|Last Modified:||17. Feb 2013 11:03|
Abel, A. B., and B. S. Bernanke (2005), Macroeconomics, Fifth Edition, Pearson Addison Wesley
Cagan, P. (1965), Determinants and Effects of Changes in the U.S. Money Stock, 1875-1960, New York: National Bureau of Economic Research
Christiano, L. and L. Ljunqvist (1988), “Money does Granger-Cause Output in the Bivariate Money-Output Relation.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, pp. 217-235
Coleman, W. J. II. (1996), “Money and Output: A Test of Reverse Causation.” American Economic Review, vol. 86(1), pp. 90-111, March
Compustat (2008), Standard & Poor's, a Division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Cottrell, A. (1992), “Post Keynesian Monetary Economics: A Critical Survey.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 18, pp. 587-605, Fall
Eichenbaum, M. and K. Singleton (1986), “Do Equilibrium Real Business Cycle Theories Explain Postwar U.S. Business Cycles?”, in Stanley Fischer, ed., NBER Macroeconomics Annual, Cambridge: MIT Press
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Economic Data, http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/
Fisher, I. (1923), “The Business Cycle Largely a Dance of the Dollar.” Journal of the American Statistical Society, vol. 18, pp. 1024 ff.
Freeman, S, and G. W. Huffman (1991), “Inside Money, Output, and Causality.” International Economic Review, Vol. 32, No.3., August, pp. 645-667
Friedman, M. and A. J. Schwartz (1963), A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960, Princeton, Princeton University Press
Granger, C. W. J. (1969). “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods.” Econometrica 37, pp. 424–438
Holmes, J. and P. A. Hutton (1992), “A New Test of Money/Income Causality,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking
Hume, D. (1752), “Of Money.” Reprinted in E. Rotwein, David Hume: Writings on Economics. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1955, pp. 33-46.
Kaldor, N. (1960), “The Radcliffe Report.” Review of Economics and Statistics 42, 1, February, pp. 14-19.
Keynes, J. M. (1924), A Tract on Monetary Reform. London: Macmillan
King, R. and C. Plosser (1984), “Money, Credit, and Prices in a Real Business Cycle.” American Economic Review 74, pp. 363-380
Litterman, R. and L. Weiss (1985), “Money, Real Interest Rates and Output: A Reinterpretation of U.S. Postwar Data.” Econometrica 53, pp. 129-156
Long, J. B., Jr and C. I. Plosser (1983), “Real Business Cycles.” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 91(1), pp. 39-69, February
Mishkin, F. S. (1995), "Symposium on the Monetary Transmission Mechanism." Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 9, No. 4., Autumn, pp. 3-10
Mulligan, C. B. (1997), “Scale Economies, the Value of Time, and the Demand for Money: Longitudinal Evidence from Firms.” Journal of Political Economy, 105 (5), October, pp. 1061-79
Muth, J. F. (1961), “Rational Expectations and the Theory of Price Movements,” Econometrica 29, pp. 315-335
Romer, C. D. and D. H. Romer (1989), “Does Monetary Policy Matter? A New Test in the Spirit of Friedman and Schwartz.” NBER Macroeconomics Annual, Vol. 4, pp.121-170
Sims, C. A. (1972), “Money, Income, and Causality.” American Economic Review, Vol. 62, No. 4, September, pp. 540-552
Sims, C. A. (1980), “Comparison of Interwar and Postwar Cycles: Monetarism Reconsidered.” American Economic Review, vol. 70 (2), pp. 250-257, May
Suppes, P. A, (1970), A Probabilistic Theory of Causality, Amsterdam: North-Holland
Taylor, J. B. (1995), “The Monetary Transmission Mechanism: An Empirical Framework.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 9, No. 4., Autumn, pp. 11-26
Tobin, J. (1970), “Money and Income: Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc?” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 84, No. 2, May, pp. 301-317
U.S. Department of Commerce: Bureau of Economic Analysis