Roy, Satyaki (2007): Structural change in employment in India since 1980s: How Lewisian is it? Published in: Social Scientist , Vol. 36, No. 11-12 (24. November 2008): pp. 47-68.
Download (167kB) | Preview
Indian economy shows high levels of growth and per capita income in recent years accompanied by an unprecedented shift of labour from agriculture to non-agriculture during the last decade. Reallocation of labour from ‘traditional’ to ‘modern’ segments in an economy having large surplus labour was conceived in the Lewisian framework as the process by way of which both accumulation of capital and exhaustion of surplus labour takes place. This paper argues that the structural change in employment in India that results from the exclusionary nature of the growth process hardly approximates the Lewisian trajectory. Finally, in the context of globalisation this paper explains the responses of firms of various size categories in non-agriculture and argues that the shift in employment basically expands the ‘reserve army of labour’ in the Marxian sense instead of exhaustion of surplus labour conceived in Lewisian conjectures.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Structural change in employment in India since 1980s: How Lewisian is it?|
|Keywords:||growth, employment, non-agriculture, structural change,reserve army of labour|
|Subjects:||E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E11 - Marxian ; Sraffian ; Kaleckian
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J23 - Labor Demand
|Depositing User:||Satyaki Roy|
|Date Deposited:||22. Oct 2009 10:05|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 03:57|
Anant T.C.A., R. Hasan, P. Mohapatra, R. Nagraj and S. K. Sasikumar (2006): “Labour Markets in India: Issues and Perspectives” in Jesus Felipe and Rana Hasan ed. Labour Markets in Asia Issues and Perspectives, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
Banerjee, Debdas (2005), Globalisation, Industrial Restructuring and Labour Standards: Where India Meets the Global, Sage Publications, New Delhi, Thousand Oaks, London.
Bhattacharya, B.B.and Sabyasachi Kar (2004), “Long-run Growth Prospects for the Indian Economy” in R.K. Sinha ed. Macroeconomic Projections, India 2025: Social Economic and Political Stability, Shipra publications, Delhi.
Choudhury, Ajit ,Dipankar Das and Anjan Chakraborty (2000), margin of margin: Profile of an Unrepantant Postcolonial Collaborator, Anustup Prokashani, Calcutta.
CMIE (2003), Monthly Review of the Indian Economy, December, 2003.
Cooper, Charles (1995), “Technological Change and Dual Economies”, United Nations University Institute for New Technologies Discussion Paper No. 9510.
CSO: Annual Survey of Industries Summary Results for Factory Sector, several years.
CSO (2007): National Accounts Statistics, 2007 and National Accounts Statistics, Back Series 1950-51 to 1999-2000.
Dasgupta, Sukti and Ajit Singh (2006), “Manufacturing, Services and Pre-mature De-industrialisation in Developing Countries: A Kaldorian Empirical Analysis” Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, Working Paper No. 327.
Fei, C.H. John and Gustav Ranis (1964), Development of the Labor Surplus Economy: Theory and Policy, The Economic Growth Centre, Yale University, USA.
Freeman, Richard (2005), “What Really Ails Europe (and America): The Doubling of the Global Workforce”, the Globalist, June, 3.
GOI (2007): Economic Survey 2006-07, Ministry of Finance Economic Division.
Kaldor, N. (1966), Causes of the Slow Rate of Economic Growth of the United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Kaldor, N. (1967), Strategic Factors in Economic Development, New York State School of Industrial and Labour Relations, Cornell University, Ithaca.
Kalecki, M. (1971), Selected Essays on the Dynamics of the Capitalist Economy, Cambridge University Press.
Kalecki, M. (1976), Essays on Developing Economies, Atlantic Highlands, Humanities Press.
Kaplinsky, Raphael (2005), “China, Globalisation and Neoliberal Dogma”, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.
Kirkpatrick, Colin and Armando Barrientos (2004), “The Lewis Model after Fifty years”, Development Economics and Public Policy Working Paper Series No. 9, Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester.
Kuznets, Simon (1971), Economic Growth of Nations: Total Output and Production Structure, Cambridge Mass.
Leeson, P. F.(1979), “The Lewis Model and Development Theory’, The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, Vol. 47, No. 3, pp.196-210.
Lewis, W.A. (1954), “Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour”, The Manchester School, Vol.22, No.2, pp.139-91.
Lewis, W.A. (1979), “The Dual Economy Revisited”, The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, Vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 211-29.
Mathew, E.T. (2006), Employment and Unemployment in India: Emerging Tendencies during Post-Reform Period, Sage Publications, New Delhi.
Nathan, Dev (2007), “Globalisation of Labour”, Economic and Political Weekly, pp. 3995-4001.
NSSO (1998): NSS 51st Round (July 1994-June 1995); No 434 (51/2.2/2) Unorganised Manufacturing Sector in India: Salient Features.
NSSO (2002), NSS 56th. Round (July 2000-June 2001); No.477 (56/2.2/1) Unorganised Manufacturing Sector in India: Key Results.
NSSO (2006), NSS 61st. Round (July 2004-June 2005); No.515 (61/10/1) Employment and Unemployment Situation in India, Part-I.
Papola, T.S. (2006), “Emerging Structure of Indian Economy: Implications of Growing Intersectoral Imbalance”, The Indian Economic Journal, Vol. 54, No.1, pp. 5-25.
Patnaik, Prabhat (2003), “On the Need for Regulating Technological Change”, Professor J.K. Mehta Centenary Celebration Lecture.
Ranis, Gustav (2004), “Arthur Lewis’ Contribution to Development Thinking and Policy”, Centre Discussion Paper No. 891, Economic Growth Centre, Yale University.
Ranis, Gustav and Frances Stewart (1999), “V-Goods and the Role of the Urban Informal Sector in Development”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 47, No.2, pp. 259-88.
Roy, Satyaki (2007), “Do Minimum Wages Reduce Employment in Small Enterprise Clusters”, Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 709-719.