Rigdon, Mary L. and Levine, Adam Seth (2009): The Role of Expectations and Gender in Altruism.
Download (286kB) | Preview
A central question in the study of altruism has been whether there is a systematic gender difference in giving behavior. Most experimental economics research has found that women are more generous than men. Evidence also suggests that gender differences depend upon the price of giving: males are more altruistic when the price of giving is low, while females are more altruistic when the price of giving is high. However, in the modified dictator game, a key variable in one’s decision to give is what one expects to receive. Systematic differences in those expectations may well contribute to systematic differences in altruistic behavior. We show that these expectations drive an important and widely reported result. When these expectations are homegrown, we replicate the finding. When expectations of receiving are uniform rather than homegrown, gender differences in price sensitivity disappear: males and females give equal amounts. This suggests that it is gender differences in expectations about others’ giving — not differences in tastes for fairness — that explains the previous results.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||The Role of Expectations and Gender in Altruism|
|Keywords:||altruism, charitable giving, dictator game, gender differences, experiment|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles
D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D64 - Altruism ; Philanthropy
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
|Depositing User:||Mary Rigdon|
|Date Deposited:||16. Dec 2009 05:55|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 06:18|
Andreoni, James, William Harbaugh, and Lise Vesterlund. 2007. “Altruism in Experiments,” New Palgrave Dictionary in Economics, 2nd edition (eds. Steven Durlauf and Lawrence Blume) New York: Macmillan.
Andreoni, James and John Miller. 2002. “Giving According to GARP: An Experimental Test of the Consistency of Preferences for Altruism,” Econometrica 70(2): 737–753.
Andreoni, James and Lise Vesterlund. 2001. “Which is the Fair Sex? Gender Differences in Altruism,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(1), 293–312.
Bekkers, Ren ́e. 2005. “When and Why Matches Are More Effective Subsidies than Rebates,” Working Paper, Department of Sociology, Utrecht University.
Belfield, C. R. and A. P. Beney. (2000). “What Determines Alumni Generosity? Evidence for the U.K.,” Educational Economics 8(1), 65–80.
Bolton, Gary E. and Elena Katok. 1995. “An Experimental Test for Gender Differences in Beneficent Behavior,” Economics Letters 18, 287–292.
Brambor, Thomas, William R. Clark, and Matt Golder. 2006. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses,” Political Analysis 14(1), 63–82.
Carpenter, Jeffrey C. 2005. “Endogenous Social Preferences,” Review of Radical Political Economy 37(1), 63–84.
Croson, Rachel and Uri Gneezy. 2008. “Gender Differences in Preferences,” Journal of Economic Literature 47(2), 1–27.
Davis, Douglas D., Edward Millner, and Robert Reilly. 2005. “Subsidy Schemes and Charitable Con- tributions: A Closer Look.” Experimental Economics 8, 85–106.
Dickinson, David L. and Jill Tiefenthaler. 2002. “What is Fair? Experimental Evidence,” Southern Economic Journal 69, 414–428.
Eckel, Catherine C. and Philip Grossman. in press. “Difference in the Economic Decisions of Men and Women: Experimental Evidence,” Handbook of Experimental Results (eds. C. Plott and V. Smith) New York, Elsevier.
Eckel, Catherine C. and Philip J. Grossman. 2006. “Subsidizing Charitable Giving with Rebates or Matching: Further Laboratory Evidence,” Southern Economic Journal 72(4), 794–807.
Eckel, Catherine C., and Philip J. Grossman. 2003. “Rebate Versus Matching: Does How We Subsidize Charitable Giving Matter?” Journal of Public Economics 87, 681–701.
Eckel, Catherine C. and Philip Grossman. 1998. “Are Women Less Selfish Than Men? Evidence from Dictator Experiments,” Economic Journal 107, 726–735.
Eckel, Catherine and Philip Grossman. 1996. “The Relative Price of Fairness: Gender Differences in a Punishment Game,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 30, 143–158.
Fisman, Raymond, Shachar Kariv, and Daniel Markovits. 2005. “Individual Preferences for Giving,” Working Paper, Yale Law School.
Forsythe, Robert, Joel Horwitz , N. E. Savin, and Martin Sefton. 1994. “Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments,” Games and Economic Behavior 6, 347–369.
Hall, Holly. 2004. “Gender Differences in Giving: Going, Going, Gone?” Fundraising as a Profession Advancements and Challenges in the Field: New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising 43, 71–81.
Harbaugh, William and Kate Krause. 2000. “Children’s Altruism in Public Good and Dictator Exper- iments,” Economic Inquiry 38(1), 95–109.
Havens, John J., Mary A. O’Herilihy, and Paul G. Schervish. 2006. “Charitable Giving: How Much, By Whom, to What, and How?” The Non-Profit Sector, 2nd edition (eds. Walter W. Powell and Richard Steinberg) New Haven, Yale University Press.
Iriberri, Nagore and Pedro Rey-Biel. 2009. “The Role of Role Uncertainty in the Modified Dictator Game,” Working Paper.
Karlan, Dean and John List. 2007. “Does Price Matter in Charitable Giving? Evidence from a Large- Scale Natural Field Experiment,” American Economic Review 97(5), 1774–1793.
Kaplan, Ann E. and M. Joanne Hayes. 1993. “What We Know about Women as Donors,” New Direc- tions for Philanthropic Fundraising (special issue) 2, 5–20.
Meier, Stephan. 2007. “Do Subsidies Increase Charitable Giving in the Long Run? Matching Donations in a Field Experiment,” Journal of the European Economic Association, 5(6), 1203–1222.
Rigdon, Mary, Keiko Ishii, Motoki Watabe, and Shinobu Kitayama. 2009. “Minimal Social Cues in the Dictator Game,” Journal of Economic Psychology 30(3), 358–367.
Selten, Reinhard and Axel Ockenfels. 1998. “An Experimental Solidarity Game,” Journal of Economic Behavior Organization 34, 517–539.
Simmons, Walter O. and Rosemarie Emanuele. 2007. “Male-female Giving Differentials: Are Women More Altruistic?” Journal of Economic Studies 34(6), 534–550.
Taylor, Martha A. and Sonya Shaw-Hardy (Eds.) (2005). The Transformative Power of Women’s Philanthropy: New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Vesterlund, Lise. 2006. “Why do People Give?” In Richard Steinberg and Walter W. Powell (Eds.), The Nonprofit Sector, 2nd edition, New Jersey, Yale University Press.
“Why Focus on Women’s Philanthropy?” statistics provided by Women’s Philanthropy Institute, Cen- ter for Philanthropy, Indiana University.