Okoboi, Geofrey (2009): Economic viability of fertiliser use in Uganda's agriculture.
Download (177kB) | Preview
We examine the viability of inorganic fertiliser use in Uganda, using the 2005/06 Uganda National Household Survey data. We also explore the farmers’ characteristics under which fertiliser use is more profitable. We find that inorganic fertiliser use is more profitable for only a few crops and less profitable or unprofitable for most crops, even when their yield is high. Furthermore, we find that farmer profit with fertiliser use increases with access to extension services and/or use of improved seeds. Thus, blanket promotion of fertiliser use, without a case-by-case consideration of fertiliser-crop profitability is likely to be counter-productive to the drive of increasing agricultural productivity and household income in Uganda. Hence, the drive to increase fertiliser use in Uganda can succeed only if farmers are widely sensitized not about the potential of fertiliser to increase yield but the crops on which fertiliser use is more profitable and the preconditions for its profitability.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Economic viability of fertiliser use in Uganda's agriculture|
|Keywords:||Fertiliser use; economic viability; Uganda|
|Subjects:||Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q16 - R&D ; Agricultural Technology ; Biofuels ; Agricultural Extension Services
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q12 - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
|Depositing User:||Geofrey Okoboi|
|Date Deposited:||21. Dec 2009 06:13|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 16:57|
Appleton S and Balihuta A, 1996. Education and Agricultural Productivity: Evidence from Uganda. Working Papers 96-5. Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford, UK.
Battese GE and Coelli TJ, 1995. A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data. Empirical Economics 20, 325-332.
Bauer PW, 1990. Recent Developments in the Econometric Estimation of Fontiers. Journal of Econometrics 46, 21-39.
Deaton A, 1997. The Analysis of Household Surveys: A Microeconomic Approach to Development Policy. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, USA.
Evenson RE and Mwabu G, 1998. The Effects of Agricultural Extension on Farm Yields in Kenya. Discussion Paper No. 978. Economic Growth Center, Yale University. http://ideas.repec.org/p/fth/yalegr/798.html
FAO, 1999. Fertiliser Strategies. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome, Italy
Heisey, PW and Mwangi W, 1996. Fertiliser Use and Maize production in Sub-Saharan Africa. Working Paper 96-01. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center. http://www.cimmyt.org/english/docs/eco_wpaper/ewp96_01.pdf
Hung, AT Chang JH and Kobayashi H, 1991. Effect of Fertiliser Management and Rhizobia Inoculation on Yield and Quality of Vegetable Soybean. In Shanmugasundaram S (ed), Vegetable Soybean: Research Needs for Production and Quality Improvement. Kenting, Taiwan.
Kaizzi, C K, 2002. The Potential Benefit of Green Manures and Inorganic Fertilisers in Cereal Production on Contrasting Soils in Eastern Uganda. Ecology and Development Series, Vol. 4. Center for Development Research (ZEF), University of Bonn, Germany
Karugia et al, 2009. Responding to Food Price Crisis in Eastern and Southern Africa: Policy Options for National and Regional Action. ReSAKSS Working Paper No. 27. ReSAKSS-Eastern and Central Africa.
Kelly VA, 2006. Factors Affecting Demand for Fertiliser in Sub-Saharan Africa. Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper 23. World Bank.
Kelly V and Murekezi A, 2000. Fertiliser Response and Profitability in Rwanda: A Synthesis of Findings from MINAGRI Studies Conducted by the Food Security Research Project (FSRP) and The FAO Soil Fertility Initiative. http://www.aec.msu.edu/fs2/rwanda/fertiliser.pdf
Kieft H and Coulibaly B, 1993. How Fertile is Fertiliser use? ILEIA Newsletter. Vol. 9 No. 2. Leusden, Netherlands
Kumbhakar SC and Knox Lovell CA, 2002. Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Makhdum MI, Nawaz M, Shabab-ud-Din AM and Chaudhry FI, 2001. Effect of Phosphorus fertiliser on Growth, Yield and Fibre Quality of Two Cotton Cultivars. J. res. Sci., 12(2), 140-146.
Makhdum MI, Nawaz M, Chaudhry FI and Shabab-ud-Din AM, 2006. Effects of Gypsum as a Sulphur fertiliser in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Production. Int. J. Agri. Biol., Vol. 3, No. 4.
MFPED, 2008. Background to the Budget Fiscal Year 2008/09: Achieving Prosperity for All through Infrastructure Development, Enhancing Employment and Economic Growth Ministry of Finance Planning and Economic Development. Kampala, Uganda.
MFPED, 2009. Background to the Budget Fiscal Year 2008/09: Enhancing Strategic Interventions to Improve Business Climate and Revitalise Production to Achieve Prosperity for All. Ministry of Finance Planning and Economic Development. Kampala, Uganda.
NPA, 2009. National Development Plan (Draft). National Planning Authority, Kampala, Uganda
Ohallorans JM, 2009. Fertiliser Management Practices for Crops of Major Economic Importance in Puerto Rico. http://www.Reeis.Usda.Gov/Web/Crisprojectpages/195090.html Accessed 10 November 2009.
Tittonell AP, 2007. Msimu wa Kupanda: Targeting Resources within Diverse, Heterogeneous and Dynamic Farming Systems of East Africa. PhD Thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
Viyas VS, 1983. Asian Agriculture: Achievements and Challenges. Asian Development. Review, 1 (1): 27-44.
World Bank, 2007. World Development Report 2008 Agriculture for Development. Washington, D.C.
Xu Z, Guan Z, Jayne TS and Black R, 2009. Factors Influencing the Profitability of Fertiliser Use on Maize in Zambia. Policy synthesis http://www.aec.msu.edu/fs2/zambia/ps32.pdf Accessed 10 November 2009.