Flores, Nicholas E. and Graves, Philip E. (2008): Optimal public goods provision: implications of endogenizing the labor/leisure choice. Published in: Land Economics , Vol. 84, No. 4 : pp. 701-707.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_19923.pdf Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Conventional analysis of public goods provision aggregates individual willinness to pay while treating income as exogenous, ignoring the fact that we generate income to allow us to purchase utility-generating goods. We explore the implications of endogenizing the laborl/leisure decision by explicitly considering leisure demand in a model of public goods provision. We consider benefit analysis of public goods provision and find that increments of the public good will generally be under-valued using conventional analysis while decrements to the public good (rare in public good settings) will be overvalued.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Optimal public goods provision: implications of endogenizing the labor/leisure choice |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | environmental economics; willingness-to-pay; willingness-to-accept; valuation; public goods; public goods provision; benefit-cost analysis |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D0 - General H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics N - Economic History > N5 - Agriculture, Natural Resources, Environment, and Extractive Industries Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D61 - Allocative Efficiency ; Cost-Benefit Analysis |
Item ID: | 19923 |
Depositing User: | Philip E. Graves |
Date Deposited: | 11 Jan 2010 07:44 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 17:21 |
References: | Freeman, A. Myrick III. 1993. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values. Washington, D.C: Resources for the Future. Graves, Philip E. 2004. "On the Valuation of Pure Public Goods." Manuscript. Department of Economics, University of Colorado. Boulder. Graves, Philip E. 2007. Environmental Economics: A Critique of Benefit-Cost Analysis. New York: Rowman and Littlefield. Hicks, John R. 1943. "The Four Consumer's Surpluses." The Review of Economic Studies, 11, 1, 31-41. Just, Richard E., Darrell L. Hueth, and Andrew Schmidt. 1982. Applied Welfare Economics and Public Policv. Englewood Clifl's, N.J.: Prentice- Hall. McFadden. Daniel. 1994. "Contingent Valuation and Social Choice." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76 (4): 689-708. Maler. Karl-Göran. 1974. Environmental Economics: A Theoretical Inquiry. Baltimore. Md.: Johns Hopkins Universily Press for Resources for the Future. Samuelson, Paul A. 1954. "The Pure Theory of Public E.xpenditure." Review of Economics and Statistics 36 (4): 387-89. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/19923 |