Comunicación indirecta en situaciones de soborno y amenaza

Estrada, Fernando (2009): Comunicación indirecta en situaciones de soborno y amenaza. Published in: Sociedad y Economía , Vol. 16, (6 September 2009): pp. 67-85.

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to explain the relevance of the theory of indirect communication strategy and negotiating conflict. Based on Thomas Schelling illustrates indirect communication cases: bribery and threats. It shows that both bribery and threats are rational preference mechanisms, whose functions can be expressed in non-linear diagrams. This analysis also contributes to the theory of strategic games very different from zero. Indirect communication is a fundamental basis for strategic action in various forms of conflict, from war to irregular traffic jams caused by vehicular traffic. Our particular interest in the bribery and the threat is related to common cases in the colombian conflict.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Indirect communication in bribery and threatening situations
• Language: Spanish
• Keywords: Strategy of Conflict, indirect communication, negotiation, bribery, threats, indirect speech acts.
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D74 - Conflict ; Conflict Resolution ; Alliances ; Revolutions; D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D79 - Other

References

Betty Tullera, McNeel G. Jantzena, Viktor K. Jirsa,2008, “A dynamical approach to speech categorization Two routes to learning” New Ideas in Psychology 26, 208–226.

Brown P, Levinson SC, 1987, Politeness: Some Universalism Language Usage, Cambridge University Press, New York. Clark HH, 1996, Using Language (Cambridge University Press, New York.

Holtgraves TM, 2002, Language as Social Action (Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).

Pinker S, 2007, The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature, Viking, New York.

Dawkins R, Krebs JR, 1978, Animal signals: Information or manipulation? Behavioral Ecology, eds Krebs JR,Davies NB (Blackwell, Oxford), pp 282–309.

Estrada, Fernando, 2004, Las metáforas de una guerra perpetua. Pragmática de la argumentación en el conflicto armado en Colombia, Fondo Editorial Universidad Eafit, pgs. 178.

Estrada, Fernando, 2007a, "La información y el rumor en zonas de conflicto, estrategias por el poder local en la confrontación armada en Colombia", Revista Análisis Político, IEPRI, v.60 p.44 – 59.

Estrada, Fernando, 2007b, "La argumentación: Alternativa para el manejo de conflictos" . Revista Zero, Universidad Externado de Colombia, v.18, pp.48 – 54.

Feiler B, 2000, Pocketful of dough. Gourmet October:99 101.

Goffman E, 1959, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Doubleday, New York).Versión española: La presencia de la persona en la vida cotidiana, Buenos Aires, Amorrortou, 1981.

Grice HP, 1975, Logic and conversation. Syntax & Semantics, eds Cole P, Morgan JL (Academic, New York),Vol 3.

Pinker S, 2007, The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature (Viking, New York).

Richard Breheny, 2006, Communication and Folk Psychology, Mind & Language, Vol. 21 No. 1 February, pp. 74–107.

Schelling T. C. 1960, The Strategy of Conflict, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (Versión al español de

Adolfo Martín, La Estrategia del Conflicto, Madrid, Editorial Tecnos, 1964)

Stephen Levinson, 2000, “After Grice: Neo- and post-perspectives”, Review article of Stephen Levinson, Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. xxiii + 480 pp., en Journal of Pragmatics 38, 2223–2234, Paperback, ISBN: 0-262-62130-4.

Williams GC, 1966, Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought (Princeton University Press, Princeton); Trivers R (1985) Social Evolution (Benjamin/Cummings, Reading, MA).