Payments for Environmental Services in Costa Rica

Pagiola, Stefano (2006): Payments for Environmental Services in Costa Rica.

Abstract

Costa Rica pioneered the use of the payments for environmental services (PES) approach in developing countries by establishing a formal, country-wide program of payments, the PSA program. The PSA program has worked hard to develop mechanisms to charge the users of environmental services for the services they receive. It has made substantial progress in charging water users, and more limited progress in charging biodiversity and carbon sequestration users. Because of the way it makes payments to service providers (using approaches largely inherited from earlier programs), however, the PSA program has considerable room for improvement in the efficiency with which it generates environmental services. With experience, many of these weaknesses are being gradually corrected as the PSA program evolves towards a much more targeted and differentiated program. An important lesson is the need to be flexible and to adapt to lessons learned and to changing circumstances.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Institution: World Bank
• Language: English
• Keywords: Payments for Environmental Services; Costa Rica; FONAFIFO
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q25 - Water; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q20 - General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q57 - Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services ; Biodiversity Conservation ; Bioeconomics ; Industrial Ecology; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q50 - General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q28 - Government Policy; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q23 - Forestry

References

Arroyo-Mora, J.P., Sánchez-Azofeifa, G.A. Rivard, B., Calvo, J.C., and Janzen, D.H., 2005. Dynamics in landscape structure and composition for the Chorotega region, Costa Rica from 1960 to 2000. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 106:27-39. Instituto Costarricense de Acueductos y Alcantarillados (AyA) and Organización Panamaericana de la Salud/Organización Mundial de la Salud (OPS/OMS), 2000. Agua potable y saneamiento de Costa Rica: Análisis sectorial. San José, AyA and OPS/OMS. Bruijnzeel, L.A., 2004. Hydrological functions of moist tropical forests: not seeing the soil for the trees? Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environments, 104:185-228. Calder, I. 1999. The Blue Revolution: Land Use and Integrated Water Resource Management. Earthscan, London. Castro, E., 2001. Costarrican experience in the charge for hydro environmental services of the biodiversity to finance conservation and recuperation of hillside ecosystems. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Market Creation for Biodiversity Products and Services, OECD, Paris, 25-26 January 2001. Castro, R., and Tattenbach, F., with Olson, N., and Gamez, L., 1997. The Costa Rican experience with market instruments to mitigate climate change and conserve biodiversity. Paper presented at the Global Conference on Knowledge for Development in the Information Age, Toronto, Canada, 24 June 1997. Chomitz, K.M., Brenes, E., and Constantino, L., 1999. Financing environmental services: The Costa Rican experience and its implications. Science of the Total Environment, 240:157-169. Chomitz, K., and Kumari, K., 1998. The Domestic Benefits of Tropical Forests: A Critical Review. World Bank Research Observer, 13:13-35. Echevarría, M., 2002. Water user associations in the Cauca valley: A voluntary mechanism to promote upstream-downstream cooperation in the protection of rural watersheds. Land-Water Linkages in Rural Watersheds Case Study Series. FAO, Rome. Espinoza, A., Morera, A., Mora, D., and Torres, R., 2003. Calidad del agua potable en Costa Rica: Situación actual y perspectivas. Análisis de Situación de Salud Series, Report No.13. Organización Panamericana de la Salud, San José. Fallas, J. 2006. Identificación de zonas de importancia hídrica y estimación de ingresos por canon de aguas para cada zona. FONAFIFO, San José. Fondo Nacional de Financiamiento Forestal (FONAFIFO), 2000. El desarollo del sistema de pago de servicios ambientales en Costa Rica. FONAFIFO, San José (in Spanish). Fondo Nacional de Financiamiento Forestal (FONAFIFO), 2005. FONAFIFO: Más de una década de acción. FONAFIFO, San José (in Spanish). Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), 2000. Costa Rica. Aquastat country profile. FAO, Rome. Hamilton, L.S., and King, P.N., 1983. Tropical Forest Watersheds: Hydrologic and Soils Response to Major Uses and Conversions. Westview Press, Boulder. Ibrahim, M., Gobbi, J., Casasola, F., Chacón, M., Ríos, N., Tobar, D., Villanueva, C., and Sepúlveda, C., 2006. Enfoques alternativos de pagos por servicios ambientales: Experiencia del proyecto Silvopastoril. Paper presented at the Workshop on Costa Rica’s Experience with Payments for Environmental Services. San José, 25-26 September 2006. Kaimowitz, D., 2000. Useful myths and intractable truths: The politics of the link between forests and water in Central America. CIFOR, San José. Landell-Mills, N., and Porras, I., 2002. Silver bullet or fools’ gold? A global review of markets for forest environmental services and their impact on the poor. IIED, London. Miranda, M., Porras, I.T., and Moreno, M.L., 2003. The social impacts of payments for environmental services in Costa Rica: A quantitative field survey and analysis of the Virilla watershed. Markets for Environmental Services Paper No.1, IIED, London. Muñoz, R., 2004. Efectos del programs de Pagos por Servicios Ambientales en las condiciones de vida de los campesinos de la Península de Osa. Unpublished MA thesis. Universidad de Costa Rica, San José (in Spanish). Muñoz, C., Guevara, A., Bulás, J.M., Torres, J.M., and Braña, J., Forthcoming. Los pagos por los servicios hidrológicos del bosque en México. In: S. Pagiola, J. Bishop, and N. Landell-Mills, (Editors), La Venta de Servicios Ambientales Forestales, 2nd edition. Instituto Nacional de Ecología, México (in Spanish). Oficina Costarricense de Implementación Conjunta (OCIC), 1999. National report on Activities Implemented Jointly during the pilot phase. OCIC, San José. Ortiz Malavasi, R., Sage Mora, L.F., and Borge Carvajal, C., 2002. Impacto del Programa de Pago por Servicios Ambientales en Costa Rica como medio de reducción de pobreza en los medios rurales. RUTA, San José (in Spanish). Pagiola, S., 2002. “Paying for water services in Central America: Learning from Costa Rica.” In: S. Pagiola, J. Bishop, and N. Landell-Mills (Editors), Selling Forest Environmental Services: Market-based Mechanisms for Conservation. Earthscan, London, pp.37-61. Pagiola, S., forthcoming. Assessing the efficiency of payments for environmental services programs. World Bank, Washington. Pagiola, S., Agostini, P., Gobbi, J., de Haan, C., Ibrahim, M., Murgueitio, E., Ramírez, E., Rosales, M., and Ruíz, J.P., 2004. Paying for biodiversity conservation services in agricultural landscapes. Environment Department Paper No.96, World Bank, Washington. Pagiola, S., Arcenas, A., and Platais, G., 2005. Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America. World Development, 33:237–253. Pagiola, S., and Platais, G., Forthcoming. Payments for Environmental Services: From Theory to Practice. World Bank, Washington. Pagiola, S., Platais, G., and Ducassi, L., 2006. Paying for biodiversity: The Trust Fund for Sustainable Biodiversity Conservation. Paper presented at the Workshop on Costa Rica’s Experience with Payments for Environmental Services. San José, 25-26 September 2006. Pfaff, A., Robalino, J.A., and Sanchez-Azofeifa, G.A., 2006. Payments for Environmental Services: Empirical analysis for Costa Rica. Columbia University, New York. Ross, M., Depro, B., and Pattanayak, S.K., 2006. Assessing the economy-wide effects of the PSA Program. Paper presented at the Workshop on Costa Rica’s Experience with Payments for Environmental Services. San José, 25-26 September 2006. Sierra, R., and Russman, E., 2006. On the efficiency of environmental service payments: A forest conservation assessment in the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica. Ecological Economics, 59:131-141. Sills, E., Arriagada, R., Pattanayak, S., Ferraro, P., Carrasco, L., Ortiz, E., and Cordero, S., 2006. Impact of the PSA Program on land use. Paper presented at the Workshop on Costa Rica’s Experience with Payments for Environmental Services. San José, 25-26 September 2006. Tattenbach, F., Obando, G.,and Rodríguez, J. 2006. Mejora del excedente nacional del pago de Servicios Ambientales. FONAFIFO, San José (in Spanish). White, D., Holmann, F., Fijusaka, S., Reategui, K., and Lascano, C., 2001. Will intensifying pasture management in Latin America protect forests—or is it the other way round? In: A. Angelsen and D. Kaimowitz (Editors), Agricultural Technologies and Tropical Deforestation. CABI Publishing, Wallingford World Bank. 2000. Costa Rica Ecomarkets Project: Project Appraisal Document. Report No.20434-CR, World Bank, Washington. Zbinden, S., and Lee, D., 2005. Paying for environmental services: An analysis of participation in Costa Rica’s PSA Program. World Development, 33:255–272.