Graafland, J.J. and Ven van de, B. and Stoffele, N. (2003): Strategies and instruments for organising CSR by small and large businesses in the Netherlands. Published in: Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 1, No. 47 (2003): pp. 45-60.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_20754.pdf Download (178kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper analyses the use of strategies and instruments for organising ethics by small and large business in the Netherlands. We find that large firms mostly prefer an integrity strategy to foster ethical behaviour in the organisation, whereas small enterprises prefer a dialogue strategy. Both large and small firms make least use of a compliance strategy that focuses on controlling and sanctioning the ethical behaviour of workers. The size of the business is found to have a positive impact on the use of several instruments, like code of conduct, ISO certification, social reporting, social handbook and confidential person. Also being a subsidiary of a larger firm has a significant positive influence on the use of instruments. The most popular instrument used by small firms is to let one member of the board be answerable for ethical questions, which fits the informal culture of most small firms. With respect to 2 sectorial differences, we find that firms in the metal manufacturing and construction sectors are more actively using formal instruments than firms in the financial service sector and retail sector. The distinction between family and non-family firms hardly affects the use of instruments.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Strategies and instruments for organising CSR by small and large businesses in the Netherlands |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Comparison of small and large firms; ethics strategies; ethics instruments; organisation of corporate social responsibility |
Subjects: | M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration > M14 - Corporate Culture ; Diversity ; Social Responsibility L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L29 - Other |
Item ID: | 20754 |
Depositing User: | Johan Graafland |
Date Deposited: | 17 Feb 2010 23:37 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 10:44 |
References: | Adams, J.S., A. Tashchian and T.H. Shore: 2001, Codes of Ethics as Signals for Ethical Behavior, Journal of Business Ethics, 29, pp. 199-211. Etzioni, A.: 1988, The Moral Dimension. Towards a New Economics, The Free Press, New York. Graafland, J.J.: 2002a, Profits and Principles: Four Perspectives, Journal of Business Ethics, 35, pp. 293-305. Graafland, J. J.: 2002b, Modelling the Trade Off Between Profits and Principles, De Economist, 150, pp. 129-54 Graafland, J.J.: 2002c, Sourcing Ethics in the Textile Sector: the Case of C&A, Business Ethics: A European Review, 11, nr. 3, July, pp. 282-294 Graafland, J.J., B.W. van de Ven and N.C.G.M. Stoffele: 2002, Wat betekent maatschappelijk ondernemen concreet?, Tilburg University, www.uvt.nl/fww/cmo Hummels, H. and E. Karssing: 2000, Ethiek organiseren, in: R. Jeurissen (ed.), Bedrijfsethiek een goede zaak, Van Gorcum, Assen, pp. 196-224. Kaptein, M. and J. Wempe: 1998, Twelve Gordian Knots When Developing an Organisational Code of Ethics, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 17, pp. 853-69. Kaptein, M. and F. Buiter: 2001, De integere organisatie 2., Stichting Beroepsmoraal en Misdaadpreventie, Den Haag Kohut, G.E. and S.E. Corriher: 1994, The Relationship of Age, Gender, Experience and Awareness of Written Ethics Policies to Business Decision Making, SAM Advanced Management Journal, Winter, pp. 32-39. Marnburg, E.: 2000, The Behavioural Effects of Corporate Ethical Codes: Empirical Findings and Discussion, Business Ethics: A European Review, Vol. 9, nr. 3, pp. 200-210. McIntosh, M., D. Leipziger, K. Jones and G. Coleman: 1998, Corporate Citizenship. Successful Strategies for Responsible Companies, Pitman Publishing, London. Sociaal Economische Raad (SER): 2001, Corporate Social Responsibility, Van Gorcum, Assen. Sharp Paine, L.: 1994, Managing for Organizational Integrity, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 72, pp.106-117. Spence, L.J., R. Jeurissen and R. Rutherfoord: 2000, Small Business and the Environment in the UK and the Netherlands: Towards Stakeholder Cooperation, Business Ethics Quarterly, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp. 945-965. Trevino, Linda K. And K.A. Nelson, 1999, Managing Business Ethics. Straight Talk About How To Do It Right, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. Ulrich, P., Y. Lunau and T. Weber: 1998, Ethikmassnahmen in der Unternehmenspraxis, in: Ulrich, P. en J. Wieland (eds.), Unterhehmensethik in der Praxis. Impulse aus den USA, Deutschland und der Schweiz, Verlag Paul Haupt, Bern, pp. 121-194. Van de Ven, B.W.: 1999, Strategische Freiheit, kommunikative Rationalität und moralische Verantwortung des Unternehmens, in: H.G. Nutzinger und das Berliner Forum zur Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik (eds.), Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik: Kritik einer neuen Generation, Rainer Hampp Verlag, München und Mering. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/20754 |