Corten, Rense and Dronkers, J. (2005): School Achievement of Pupils From the Lower Strata in Public, Private Government-Dependent and Private Government-Independent Schools: A cross-national test of the Coleman-Hoffer thesis. Published in: Educational Research and Evaluation , Vol. 12, No. 2 (2006): pp. 179-208.
Download (238kB) | Preview
We consider the question whether pupils from the lower social strata perform better in private government-dependent schools than in public or private-independent schools, using the PISA 2000 data on European high schools. In the eighty’s, Coleman and Hoffer (1987) found in the USA that the performance of these pupils was better at religious schools than at comparable public schools. Dronkers and Robert (2003) found in PISA-data for 19 comparable countries that private government-dependent schools are more effective then comparable public schools, also after controlled for characteristics of pupils and parents and the social composition of the school. The main explanation appeared to be a better school climate in private government-dependent schools. Private independent schools were less effective than comparable public schools, but only after controlling for the social composition of the school. As a follow-up we now investigate, again with the PISA-data of these 19 countries, whether this positive effect of private government-dependent schools differs between pupils from different strata. We use various indicators to measure social strata: social, cultural and economic. We expect that the thesis of Coleman & Hoffer does hold for private government-dependent schools, because in these 19 countries they are mostly religious schools, which have more opportunities to form functional communities and create social capital. But for private independent schools, which due to their commercial foundation are less often functional communities, this relation is not expected to hold. However, the results show that public and private schools have mostly the same effects for the same kind of pupils and thus mostly not favor one kind of pupils above another kind of pupils. But private government-dependent schools are slightly more effective for pupils with less cultural capital. However, private independent schools are also more effective for pupils from large families or low status families.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||School Achievement of Pupils From the Lower Strata in Public, Private Government-Dependent and Private Government-Independent Schools: A cross-national test of the Coleman-Hoffer thesis|
|Keywords:||school choice; private schools; public schools; class differential effect of schools; cross-national comparison; PISA data|
|Subjects:||H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods
D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I21 - Analysis of Education
|Depositing User:||Jaap Dronkers|
|Date Deposited:||13. Apr 2010 02:08|
|Last Modified:||17. Feb 2013 17:35|
Archer, M. S. (1984) Social origins of educational systems. London / Beverly Hills: Sage
Bourdieu, P. (1983). The Forms of Capital. In J. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press.
Bryk, A. S., Lee, V. E. & Holland, P. B. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge (Mass.)/ London: Harvard University Press.
Coleman, J. S., Hoffer, T. B. & Kilgore, S. (1982). High school achievement: Public, Catholic, and other private schools compared. New York: Basic Books.
Coleman, J. S. & Hoffer, T. (1987). Public and private high schools. The impact of communities. New York: Basic Books.
Dijkstra, Anne Bert, René Veenstra, and Jules Peschar. 2004. "Social Capital in Education. Functional Communities around High Schools in the Netherlands." Pp. 119-144. In Creation and Returns of Social Capital. A New Research Program, edited by H. D. Flap and B. Völker. London: Routledge.
Dronkers J. (2004) Do Public and Religious Schools Really Differ? Assessing the European Evidence. In Patrick J. Wolf & Stephen Macedo (eds.) Educating Citizens: International Perspectives on Civic Values and School Choice. Pp. 287-312.Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Dronkers, J. & Robert, P. (2003). The effectiveness of public and private schools from a comparative perspective. San Domenico di Fiesole (Fi): European University Institute. EUI working paper SPS 2003/13 (http://www.iue.it/PUB/sps2003-13.pdf).
Ganzeboom, H. B. G., Graaf, P. de, Treiman, D. J. & De Leeuw, J. (1992). A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status. Social Science Research, 21, 1-56.
Garib, G. Martin Garcia, T. & Dronkers, J. (2003). Are the effects of different family-forms on children’s educational performance related to the demographic characteristics and family policies of modern societies? Paper at the second conference of the European network for empirical and comparative research on the sociological aspects of divorce, Tilburg (Netherlands), November 13-16, 2003.
Godwin, R. K. & Kemerer, F. R. (2002). School Choice Tradeoffs. Liberty, Equity, and Diversity. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Hoffer, T.B. (1998). Social Background and Achievement in Public and Catholic High Schools. Social Psychology of Education 2, 7-23.
Van Houtte, Mieke. 2004. Sociaal kapitaal in katholieke en gemeenschapsscholen in Vlaanderen: Een vergelijking. [Social Capital in Catholic and Public Schools in Flanders: a Comparison.]. Pedagogische Studiën 81, 28-41.
Hox, J. (2002). Multivariate Analysis. Techniques and Applications. Mahwah (NJ)/ London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
OECD (1999). Classifying educational programmes. Manual for ISCED97 implementation for OECD countries. Paris: OECD.
OECD. 2002a. Manual for the PISA 2000 Database. Paris: OECD.
OECD. 2002b. PISA 2000 Technical Report. Paris: OECD.
Rasbash, J., Browne, W., Goldstein, H., Yang, M., Plewis, I., Healy, M., Woodhouse, G., Draper, D., Langford, I. & Lewis, T. (2000). A user's guide to MLwiN 1.1. London: Institute of Education, University of London.
Sammons, P., Hillman, J. & Mortimore, P. (1995). Key characteristics of effective schools: A review of school effectiveness research. London: Office for Standards in Education and Institute of Education.
Scheerens, J. & Bosker, R. (1997). The Foundations of Educational Effectiveness. Kidlington/New York/Tokyo: Pergamon.
Somers, M-A., P.J. Mc Ewan, and J.D. Willms. 2004. How Effective are Private Schools in Latin-America? Comparative Education Review 48:48-69.
Sørensen, A., Morgan, S.L. (2000). School Effects: Theoretical and Methodological Issues. In Maureen T. Hallinan (red.) Handbook of the Sociology of Education. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum publishers.
Teddlie, C. & Reynolds, D. (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer.
Warm, T. A. 1985. "Weighted Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Ability in Item Response Theory with Tests of Finite Length." Oklahoma: US Coast Guard Institute.