Dronkers, J. and Robert, Peter (2005): School choice in the light of the effectiveness differences of various types of public and private school in 19 OECD countries. Published in: Journal of School Choice , Vol. 2, No. 3 (2008): pp. 260-301.
Download (280kB) | Preview
The paper approaches the issue of school choice in an indirect manner by investigating the effectiveness of public, private government-dependent and private independent schools in 19 OECD countries selected from the PISA 2000 survey for this purpose. In a multi-level approach we estimate these sector-effects, controlling for sociological characteristics of students and parents, school composition, teaching and learning conditions of schools and students’ and principals’ perception of the climate of their schools. The main explanation of the gross differences in mathematical achievement is the better social composition of private schools, both government-dependent and independent, which is a clear consequence of school choice. But our analysis also reveals that private independent schools are less effective than public schools with the same students, parents and social composition, while that private dependent schools are more effective than comparable public schools. The explanation of these remaining net differences in mathematical achievement seems to be the better school climate of private dependent schools. The comparison concludes that these net differences in mathematical achievement between public and private school-sectors are equal across nations, despite the historical and legal variations in their educational systems and school choice approaches.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||School choice in the light of the effectiveness differences of various types of public and private school in 19 OECD countries|
|Keywords:||school choice; school effectiveness; public versus private schools; cross-national comparison; secondary education; PISA data|
|Subjects:||H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods
I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I21 - Analysis of Education
|Depositing User:||Jaap Dronkers|
|Date Deposited:||13. Apr 2010 02:10|
|Last Modified:||23. Apr 2015 23:29|
Bourdieu, P. (1983). The Forms of Capital. In J. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press.
Bryk, A. S., Lee, V. E. & Holland, P. B. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge (Mass.)/ London: Harvard University Press.
Corten, R. & Dronkers, J. (2006). School Achievement of Pupils From the Lower Strata in Public, Private Government-Dependent and Private Government-Independent Schools: A cross-national test of the Coleman-Hoffer thesis. Educational Research and Evaluation 12:179-208.
Coleman, J. S., Hoffer, T. B. & Kilgore, S. (1982). High school achievement: Public, Catholic, and other private schools compared. New York: Basic Books.
Coleman, J. S. & Hoffer, T. (1987). Public and private high schools. The impact of communities. New York: Basic Books.
DiMaggio, P. (1982). Cultural Capital and School Success: The Impact of Status Culture Participation on the Grades of U.S. High School Students. American Sociological Review, 47, 189-201.
Dronkers, J., (2004). Do Public and Religious Schools Really Differ? Assessing the European Evidence. pp. 287-314 in Educating Citizens. International Perspectives on Civic Values and School Choice, edited by P. J. Wolf & S. Macedo. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Dronkers, J. & Robert, P. (2008) Differences in Scholastic Achievement of Public, Private Government-Dependent, and Private Independent Schools: A Cross-National Analysis. Educational Policy 22, 541-577.
Ganzeboom, H. B. G., Graaf, P. de, Treiman, D. J. & De Leeuw, J. (1992). A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status. Social Science Research, 21, 1-56.
Hofman, R. H. (1993). Effectief schoolbestuur. Een studie naar de bijdrage van schoolbesturen aan de effectiviteit van basisscholen. [Effective school administration. A study on the contributions of school boards to school effectiveness]. Groningen: RION.
Hox, J. (2002). Multivariate Analysis. Techniques and Applications. Mahwah (NJ)/ London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Koopman, P. & Dronkers, J. (1994). De effectiviteit van algemeen bijzondere scholen in het algemeen voortgezet onderwijs. [The effectiveness of neutral private schools in the general secondary education] Pedagogische Studiën 71: 420-441.
Merrifield, J. (2007). The Twelve Ways to Exercise or Facilitate School Choice. Journal of School Choice 2: 1
OECD (1999). Classifying educational programmes. Manual for ISCED97 implementation for OECD countries. Paris: OECD.
Rasbash, J., Browne, W., Goldstein, H., Yang, M., Plewis, I., Healy, M., Woodhouse, G., Draper, D., Langford, I. & Lewis, T. (2000). A user's guide to MLwiN 1.1. London: Institute of Education, University of London. Sammons, P., Hillman, J. & Mortimore, P. (1995). Key characteristics of effective schools: A review of school effectiveness research. London: Office for Standards in Education and Institute of Education.
Scheerens, J. & Bosker, R. (1997). The Foundations of Educational Effectiveness. Kidlington/New York/Toyko: Pergamon.
Teddlie, C. & Reynolds, D. (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer.
Vandenberghe, V. & Robin, S. (2004). "Evaluating the effectiveness of private education across countries: a comparison of methods" Labour Economics 11: 487-506.
Warm, T. A. (1985). Weighted maximum likelihood estimation of ability in Item Response Theory with tests finite length. Oklohama City: US Coast Guard Institute.