Dasgupta, Utteeyo (2009): Potential Competition in the Presence of Sunk Entry Costs: An Experiment. Published in: New Zealand Economics Papers , Vol. 43, No. 2 (August 2009): pp. 203-225.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_21945.pdf Download (39kB) | Preview |
Abstract
I study the effect of sunk entry-costs on potential competition in a multi-market framework, where potential entrants have different home market profits. Although sunk-entry-costs are supposed to increase entry barriers, my experimental results suggest that firms view entry costs differently depending on their home market profits. I find that subjects are reluctant to enter, and compete in another market if they are already earning monopoly rents. Subjects instead, collude tacitly and earn monopoly rents in home markets, thereby weakening the effect of potential competition. In contrast, subjects who earn small secure returns in their home markets aggressively enter the contestable market whenever there are scopes for earning net profits. The threat of entry and the effects of potential competition are strong in the latter situation, forcing the monopoly incumbents to lower prices to limit-pricing levels.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Potential Competition in the Presence of Sunk Entry Costs: An Experiment |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | potential competition, contestable markets, sunk cost, limit-pricing, hit-and-run entry, collusion, experiment |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C92 - Laboratory, Group Behavior D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance |
Item ID: | 21945 |
Depositing User: | Utteeyo Dasgupta |
Date Deposited: | 11 Nov 2012 07:44 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 17:47 |
References: | Bailey, Elizabeth E., and Panzar, John C. (1981) "The Contestability of Airline Markets during the Transition to Deregulation." Law and Contemporary Problems 44, 125-45. Baumol, W. (1982a) “Contestable Markets: An Uprising in the Theory of Industry Structure.” American Economic Review 72: 1-15. Baumol W., Panzar J. and Willig R (1982b) “Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure” Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York. Brock W. (1983) “Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure: A Review Article.” Journal of Political Economy 91: 1055-56. Brown-Kruse J. (1991) “Contestability in the Presence of an Alternate Market: An Experimental Examination.” The Rand Journal of Economics 22: 136-147. Cairns, D. R. and Mahabir, D. (1988) “Contestability a Revisionist View.” Economica 55: 269-276. Call G.D., Keeler T. E. (1985) “Airline Deregulation, Fares, and Market Behavior: Some Empirical Evidence.” In: Daughety Andrew F (Eds) Analytical Studies in Transport Economics Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 221-47. Cleveland, W.S. (1993) “Visualizing Data” Summit, NJ: Hobart Press 25-27. Coursey D., Issac R., and Smith V. (1984) “Natural Monopoly and Contested Markets: Some Experimental Results.” Journal of Law and Economics 27: 91-113. Coursey D., Issac R., Luke M., and Smith V. (1984) “Market Contestability in the Presence of Sunk (Entry) Costs.” The Rand Journal of Economics 15: 69-84. Dasgupta Utteeyo (2007) “When Firms Contest in Markets: An Experiment.”: In Oda, Sobei H. (Ed.) Developments on Experimental Economics: New Approaches to Solving Real-World Problems,(Springer). Dasgupta Utteeyo (2005) “Minding Your Own Business.” In: Programming Committee of the Hayashibara Forum 2004 and the Open Research Centre of the Graduate School of Kyoto Sangyo University (Eds.) Proceedings of The Experimental Economics Week in Honour of Dr Vernon L. Smith, Kyoto and Okayama, Japan. Demsetz, H. (1968) "Why Regulate Utilities?" Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 11, 55-65. Evendyn R.D, Williams A.W. (2000) “Contestability: The Debate and Industry Policy.” Economic Analysis and Policy v30: 75-91. Gilbert Richard J., (1989) “The Role of Potential Competition in Industrial Organization” The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 3, 107-127. Harrison G. (1987) “Experimental Evaluation of the Contestable Markets Hypothesis.” In: Bailey Elizabeth (Eds.) Public Regulation The MIT Press. Harrison G, McKee M. (1985) “Monopoly Behavior, Decentralized Regulation, and Contestable Markets: An Experimental Evaluation.” Rand Journal of Economics 16: 51-69. Harrison G, McKee M. and Rutström E.E. (1987) “Experimental evaluations of institutions of monopoly restraints.” In Green L and Kagel J. (Eds.) Advances in Behavioral Economics, vol. 2 Norwood, N.J: Ablex Press, 54-94. Kessides, I. (1990) Market Concentration, Contestability and Sunk Costs.” Review of Economic Statistics 72: 614-622. Kessides, I. (1991) “Entry and Market Contestability: The Evidence from the United States.” In: P. Geroski and J. Schawalback (Eds.) Entry and Market Contestability: An International Comparison Blackwell, Oxford. Millner, E. L., M. D. Pratt and R. J. Reilly (1990) “Contestability in Real-Time Experimental Glow Markets.” Rand Journal of Economics 21: 584-99. Peteraf A. Margaret, and Reed, R. (1994) "Pricing and Performance in Monopoly Airline Markets.” Journal of Law & Economics 37 : 193-213. Schwartz M. and Reynolds R (1983) “Contestable Markets: An Uprising in the Theory of Industry Structure.” Comment American Economic Review 73: 488-90. Schwartz M. (1986) “The Nature and Scope of Contestability Theory.” Oxford Economic Papers, New Series, Vol. 38, Supplement: Strategic Behavior and Industrial Competition : 37-57. Shepherd W. (1984) “Contestability vs. Competition.” American Economic Review 74: 572-87. Strassmann, Diana L. "Potential Competition in the Deregulated Airlines." The Review of Economics and Statistics 72, 696-02. Sutton, J. (1948) Sunk Costs and Market Structure. The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England. Tukey, J.W. (1977) “Exploratory Data Analysis.” Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Urs Fischbacher: z-Tree - Zurich Toolbox for Readymade Economic Experiments - Experimenter's Manual, Working Paper Nr. 21, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich, 1999. Weitzman M. (1983) “Contestable Markets: An uprising in the Theory of Industry Structure: Comment.” American Economic Review 73: 486-487. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/21945 |