Dimitris, Christopoulos and Miguel, Leon-Ledesma (2009): Smooth Breaks and Nonlinear Mean Reversion: Post-Bretton Woods Real Exchange Rates.
Download (501kB) | Preview
The recent literature on Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) has emphasized the role of two phenomena that may lead to the rejection of the PPP hypothesis: structural breaks and nonlinear adjustment induced by transaction costs. These two hypotheses are analyzed separately in the literature. We develop tests for unit roots that account jointly for structural breaks and nonlinear adjustment. Structural breaks are modeled by means of a Fourier function that allows for infrequent smooth temporary mean changes and is hence compatible with long-run PPP. Nonlinear adjustment is modeled by means of an ESTAR model. Our tests present good finite sample properties. The tests are applied to a set of 15 OECD countries’ RERs and are able to reject the null of a unit root in 14 cases. The breaks are usually associated with the great appreciation and later depreciation of the dollar in the 1980s and the ESTAR adjustment appears to play an important role.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Smooth Breaks and Nonlinear Mean Reversion: Post-Bretton Woods Real Exchange Rates|
|English Title:||Smooth Breaks and Nonlinear Mean Reversion: Post-Bretton Woods Real Exchange Rates|
|Keywords:||Fourier model; ESTAR; nonlinear adjustment; PPP;|
|Subjects:||F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F40 - General
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes
|Depositing User:||Dimitris Christopoulos|
|Date Deposited:||08. May 2010 06:42|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 20:27|
Amara, J. and Papell, D.H., 2006, Testing for purchasing power parity using stationary covariates, Applied Financial Economics 16, 29-39.
Bai, J. and Perron, P., 2003, Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models, Journal of Applied Econometrics 18, 1-22.
Bahmani-Oskooee, M., Kutan, A.M. and Zhou, S., 2007, Testing PPP in the nonlinear STAR framework, Economics Letters 94, 104-110.
Banerjee, A., Marcellino, M. and Osbat, C., 2005, Testing for PPP: Should we use panel methods?, Empirical Economics 30, 77-91.
Becker, R., W. Enders and Hurn, S., 2004, A general test for time dependence in parameters, Journal of Applied Econometrics 19, 899-906.
Becker, R., W. Enders and Lee, J, 2006, A stationarity test in the presence of unknown number of smooth breaks, Journal of Time Series Analysis 27, 381-409.
Bierens, H., 1997, Testing for a unit root with drift hypothesis against nonlinear trend stationarity, with an application to the US price level and interest rate, Journal of Econometrics 81, 29−64.
Chortareas, G. and Kapetanios, G., 2004, The Yen real exchange rate may be stationary after all: evidence from nonlinear unit root tests, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 66, 113-131.
Coakley J. and Fuertes A.M. 1997, New panel unit root tests of PPP, Economics Letters 57, 17-22.
Elliott, G. and Pesavento, E., 2006. On the failure of purchasing power parity for bilateral exchange rates after 1973, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 38, 1405-1430.
Enders, W. and Lee, J., 2004, Testing for a unit root with a nonlinear Fourier function, mimeo, University of Alabama.
Frankel, J. and Rose, A., 1995, Empirical research on nominal exchange rates, in G. Grossman and K. Rogoff (eds.): Handbook of International Economics, Vol. III, Elsevier Science.
Gadea, M-D., Montañés, A. and Reyes, M., 2004, The European Union currencies and the US dollar: from post-Bretton-Woods to the Euro, Journal of International Money and Finance 23, 1109-1133.
Hegwood, N.D. and Papell, D.H., 1998, Quasi purchasing power parity, International Journal of Finance and Economics 3, 279-289.
Imbs, J., Mumtaz, H., Ravn, M.O. and H. Rey, 2003, Non-linearities and real exchange rate dynamics. Journal of the European Economic Association 1, 639-649.
Kapetanios, G, Shin, Y. and Snell, A., 2003, Testing for a unit root in the non-linear STAR framework, Journal of Econometrics 112, 359-379.
Kilic, R. and de Jong , R, 2006, Testing a linear unit root against a stationary ESTAR process, Working Paper, School of Economics, Georgia Institute of Technology
Killian, L. and Taylor, M.P., 2003, Why is it so difficult to beat the random walk forecast of exchange rates? Journal of International Economics 60, 85-107.
Lothian, J.R. and Taylor, M.P., 1996, Real exchange rate behavior: the recent float from the perspective of the past two centuries, Journal of Political Economy 104, 488–509.
Ludlow, J. and Enders, W., 2000, Estimating non-linear ARMA models using Fourier coefficients, International Journal of Forecasting 16, 333-347.
Lundbergh, S., Terasvirta, T. and van Dijk, D., 2003, Time-varying smooth transition autoregressive models, Journal of Business and Economics Statistics 21, 104-121.
Michael, P., Nobay, A.R. and Peel, D.A., 1997, Transactions costs and nonlinear adjustment in real exchange rates: an empirical investigation, Journal of Political Economy 105, 862–79.
Ng, S. and Perron, P., 2001, Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power, Econometrica 69, 1519-54.
O’Connell, P.G.J., 1998, The overvaluation of purchasing power parity, Journal of International Economics 44, 1-19.
Papell, D.H. and Prodan, R., 2006, Aditional evidence of long-run purchasing power parity with restricted structural change, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 38, 1329-1349.
Papell, D.H., 1997, Searching for stationarity: purchasing power parity under the current float, Journal of International Economics 43, 313-332.
Papell, D.H., 2002, The great appreciation, the great depreciation, and the purchasing power parity hypothesis, Journal of International Economics 57, 51-82.
Perron, P., 1989, The great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 57, 1361–1401.
Prodan, R., 2008, Potential pitfalls in determining multiple structural changes with an application to Purchasing Power Parity, Journal of Business and Economics Statistics 26, 50-65.
Rogoff, K., 1996, The purchasing power parity puzzle,” Journal of Economic Literature 34, 647–668.
Sarno, L. and Taylor, M.P., 1998, Real exchange rates under the recent float: unequivocal evidence of mean reversion, Economics Letters 60, 131–37.
Sarno, L. and Taylor, M.P., 2002, Purchasing power parity and the real exchange rate, IMF Staff Papers 49, 65-105.
Sollis, R., 2008, US dollar real exchange rates: nonlinearity revisited. Journal of International Money and Finance 27, 516-528.
Sollis, R., Leybourne, S. and Newbold, P., 2002, Tests for symmetric and asymmetric nonlinear mean reversion in real exchange rates, Journal of Money Credit and Banking 34, 686-700.
Taylor, A.M., 2001, Potential pitfalls for the purchasing power parity puzzle? Sampling and specification biases in mean reversion tests of the Law of One Price, Econometrica 69, 473-498.
Taylor, A.M. and Taylor, M.P., 2004, The purchasing power parity debate, Journal of Economic Perspectives 18, 135-158.
Taylor, M.P. and Sarno, L., 1998, The behaviour of real exchange rates during the post-Bretton Woods period, Journal of International Economics 46, 281-312.
Taylor, M.P., Sarno, L. and Peel, D., 2001, Nonlinear mean-reversion in real exchange rates: towards a solution to the purchasing power parity puzzles, International Economic Review 42, 1015–42.
Zivot, E. and Andrews, D.W.K., 1992, Further evidence on the great crash, the oil price shocks and the unit root hypothesis, Journal of Business of Economic and Statistics 10, 251-270.