Stazka, Agnieszka (2008): International parity relations between Poland and Germany: a cointegrated VAR approach. Published in: Bank i Kredyt No. 03/2008
Download (469kB) | Preview
This paper analyses empirically the purchasing power parity, the uncovered interest parity and the real interest parity (Fisher parity) between Poland and Germany. The international parity relations are investigated jointly within the cointegrated VAR framework. Our analysis fails to find evidence that the parities, or any linear combinations of them, hold for our data set. We identify two long-run equilibrium relations: one imposing a long-run homogeneity restriction on the domestic (i.e. Polish) and foreign (i.e. German) inflation and the domestic interest rate and one that brings together the domestic real interest rate and the foreign inflation. Another interesting result is the weak exogeneity of the deviation of the real exchange rate from the PPP and the strong exogeneity of the German interest rate.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||International parity relations between Poland and Germany: a cointegrated VAR approach|
|Keywords:||cointegrated VAR, PPP, UIP, Fisher parity, Poland|
|Subjects:||E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E43 - Interest Rates: Determination, Term Structure, and Effects
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E32 - Business Fluctuations ; Cycles
F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F31 - Foreign Exchange
|Depositing User:||Agnieszka Stazka-Gawrysiak|
|Date Deposited:||22. Jul 2010 14:16|
|Last Modified:||24. Mar 2015 12:07|
Bayoumi T., Eichengreen B. (1992a), Shocking Aspects of European Monetary Unification, “Working Paper”, No. 3949, NBER, Cambridge.
Bayoumi T., Eichengreen B. (1992b), Is There a Conflict Between EC Enlargement and European Monetary Unification?, “Working Paper”, No. 3950, NBER, Cambridge.
Bekő J., Boršič D. (2007), Purchasing Power Parity in Transition Economies: Does It Hold in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovenia?, “Post-Communist Economies”, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 417-432.
Davidson J. (1998), Structural Relations, Cointegration and Identification: Some Simple Results and their Application, “Journal of Econometrics”, Vol. 87, No. 1, pp. 87-113.
De Grauwe P. (2003), Economics of Monetary Union, 5th Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Dennis J. G., Hansen H., Johansen S., Juselius K. (2005), CATS in RATS, Version 2, Estima.
Giannellis N., Papadopoulos A. (2006), Purchasing Power Parity among Developing Countries and their Trade Partners. Evidence from Selected CEECs and Implications for their Membership of EU, “Working Paper”, No. 0716, University of Crete, Department of Economics, Rethymnon.
IMF (1945), Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund, December, Washington, D.C.
Johansen S. (1995), Identifying Restrictions of Linear Equations. With Applications to Simultaneous Equations and Cointegration, “Journal of Econometrics”, Vol. 69, No. 1, pp. 111-132.
Johansen S. (1996), Likelihood-Based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models, 2nd Ed., Advanced Texts in Econometrics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Johansen S., Juselius K. (1992), Testing Structural Hypotheses in a Multivariate Cointegration Analysis of the PPP and the UIP for the UK, “Journal of Econometrics”, Vol. 53, No. 1-3, pp. 211-244.
Juselius K. (1990), Long-Run Relations in a Well Defined Statistical Model for the Data Generating Process. Cointegration Analysis of the PPP and the UIP Relations, “Discussion Paper”, No. 90-1, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics, Copenhagen.
Juselius K. (1992), On the Empirical Verification of the Purchasing Power Parity and the Uncovered Interest Rate Parity, “Nationalokonomisk Tidsskrift”, Vol. 130, No. 1, pp. 57-66.
Juselius K. (1995), Do the Purchasing Power Parity and the Uncovered Interest Rate Parity Hold in the Long Run? An Application of Likelihood Inference in a Multivariate Time Series Model, “Journal of Econometrics”, Vol. 69, No. 1, pp. 211-240.
Juselius K. (2006), The Cointegrated VAR Model: Methodology and Applications, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Juselius K., MacDonald R. (2004a), International Parity Relationships Between Germany and the United States: A Joint Modelling Approach, “Working Paper”, No. 2004/08, University of Copenhagen, Department of Economics, Finance Research Unit, Copenhagen.
Juselius K., MacDonald R. (2004b), International Parity Relationships between the USA and Japan, “Japan and the World Economy”, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 17-34.
Kenen P. B. (1969), The Theory of Optimum Currency Areas: An Eclectic View, in: R. A. Mundell, A.K. Swoboda (ed.): Monetary Problems of the International Economy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Lambelet J.-C., Mihailov A. (2005), The Triple-Parity Law, “Discussion Paper”, No. 604, University of Essex Economics, Essex.
MacDonald R. (1998), What Do We Really Know About Real Exchange Rates?, “Working Paper”, No. 28, Oesterreichische Nationalbank, Vienna.
McKinnon R. I. (1963), Optimum Currency Areas, “The American Economic Review”, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 717-725.
Mongelli F. P. (2005), What is European Economic and Monetary Union Telling us About the Properties of Optimum Currency Areas?, “Journal of Common Market Studies”, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 607-635.
Mundell R. A. (1961), A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas, “The American Economic Review”, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 657-665.
Sarno L., Taylor M. P. (2002), The Economics of Exchange Rates, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Sideris D. (2006), Purchasing Power Parity in Economies in Transition: Evidence from Central and East European Countries, “Applied Financial Economics”, Vol. 16, No. 1-2, pp. 135-143.
Singh M., Banerjee A. (2006), Testing Real Interest Parity in Emerging Markets, “Working Paper”, No. 06/249, IMF, Washington D.C.