Enea, Gabriele and Figurelli, Lucrezio and Giuntella, Giovanni Osea (2010): The Economic Benefit of Data-Communication Technology on the New York Metroplex Area.
Download (764kB) | Preview
The aim of this paper is to estimate the economic benefit for the New York Metroplex area of the controller-to-pilot communication standard known as Data-Communication. RAMS simulation software was first used to evaluate the potential impact of the new technology on airport operations in the three airports of LaGuardia, Newark and John F. Kennedy. The new technology would allow for a greater number of operations and reduce the average hourly workload for air traffic controllers. We employ a two steps procedure. First, we estimate a benefit function per number of hourly operations. Second, using the empirical distribution of hourly operations and the benefit function found in step one, we compute the average daily benefit from the technology as the reduced cost from delays plus the net effect on controllers workload due to its implementation. The procedure is applied at each airport individually and to the metroplex area as a whole. Our estimates show that the introduction of Data-Comm would yield significant savings in the New York Metroplex area.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||The Economic Benefit of Data-Communication Technology on the New York Metroplex Area|
|English Title:||The Economic Benefit of Data-Communication Technology on the New York Metroplex Area|
|Keywords:||air transportation, congestion|
|Subjects:||L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L93 - Air Transportation
R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R4 - Transportation Economics > R41 - Transportation: Demand, Supply, and Congestion ; Travel Time ; Safety and Accidents ; Transportation Noise
|Depositing User:||Giovanni Giuntella|
|Date Deposited:||26. Jul 2010 02:08|
|Last Modified:||31. Dec 2015 23:17|
1. Joint Planning and Development Office, “Next Generation Air Transportation System Integrated Plan,” Version 2.0, 2007.
2. SESAR Consortium, “The ATM Target of Operations,” Technical Report No. DLT0612-001-02-00, Toulouse, France, 2007.
3. Enea, G., Trani, A. A., La Franca, L., “Simulation-Based Study to Quantify Data-Communication Benefits in Congested Airport Terminal Area,” AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, Chicago, IL, 2009.
4. FAA, “User benefits of two-way data link ATC communications: aicraft delay and flight efficiency in congested en route airspace,” DOT/FAA/CT-95/4 Washington DC, February 1995.
5. FAA, “Benefits of controller-pilot data link ATC communications in terminal airspace,” DOT/FAA/CT-96/3 Washington DC, September 1996.
6. C/AFT, “Data Link Investment Analysis” (US), ATS Data Link Focus Group, CNS/ATM Focused Team, 1999.
7. C/AFT, “European Data Link Investment Analysis”, European Data Link Focus Group, CNS/ATM Focused Team, 2000.
8. EUROCONTROL, “LINK 2000+ Business Case Development Simulation”, EURCONTROL Experimental Center, Bretigny, FR, 1999.
9. Morrison, S. A., Winston, C., "The effect of FAA expenditures on air travel delays," Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 63(2), pages 669-678, 2008.
10. US Department of Transportation, “The American travel survey”, 1995.
11. US Department of Transportation, “The value of saving travel time: departmental guidance for conducting economic evaluations”, April 1997.
12. IATA website, http://www.iata.org/pressroom/facts_figures/traffic_results/2007-08-31-01.htm, February 8, 2010.
13. Morrison, S. A., Winston, C., "Another Look at Airport Congestion Pricing," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(5), pages 1970-1977, 2007.
14. Shingledecker, C. Giles, S. Darby, E.R., Jr. Pino, J. Hancock, T.R., “Projecting the effect of CPDLC on NAS capacity”, Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Washington, DC, 2005.