Social rights and economic objectives: The importance of competition at supra national level

Ojo, Marianne (2010): Social rights and economic objectives: The importance of competition at supra national level.

Abstract

The need for a supra national model which embraces and provides for social rights of individual Member States is becoming more apparent amidst the ever intensifying integration process within the EU and its involvement in areas which have been undermined by an economic model. This paper considers why, despite such a need for a supra national model, the “ordo liberal European polity” is favoured. It partly does so, by way of reference to two judgements from the European Court of Justice (ECJ) – namely, Laval un Partneri Ltd , and the Viking Cases.

Can competition rules (during and beyond periods of financial crises) be designed and implemented in such a way whereby the facilitation of the aims and objectives of the EU Internal Market are optimally realised? To what extent can such rules be reconciled with the all paramount and more highly prioritised goal of sustaining economic and financial stability? Further, to what extent should competition rules be given due prominence – particularly during chronic periods of financial crises? To what extent should competition be encouraged (where it would result in downward spiral and generate unproductive and detrimental results) : to what extent, therefore, should competition rules (within such a context) be respected? These also constitute further questions which this paper seeks to address.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: European Court of Justice (ECJ); integration; competition; regulation; ordo-liberalism; economic objectives; social rights; internal market; bank rescues
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D5 - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium > D53 - Financial Markets; K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law; G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G38 - Government Policy and Regulation; G - Financial Economics > G0 - General > G01 - Financial Crises; G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G21 - Banks ; Depository Institutions ; Micro Finance Institutions ; Mortgages

References

Article 87(3)(b) (TEC) EC Treaty

Article 87(3)(c) (TEC) EC Treaty

Case C-341/05, Laval un Partneri Ltd, of 18 December 2007 <http://eur lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:62005J0341:EN:HTML>

Case C-438/05 International Transport Workers’ Federation and Finnish Seamen’s Union v Viking Line ABP and OÜ Viking Line Eesti <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:62005J0438:EN:HTML>

Didziokaite Z and Gort M, „Restructuring in the Banking Sector During the Financial Crisis: The Northern Rock Case“ http://ec.europa.eu/competition/publications/cpn/2010_1_18.pdf

European Commission, „State aids n° C 15/2009 (ex N 196/2009), N 333/2009 & N 557/2009 - Germany Hypo Real Estate – Extension of formal investigation procedure, and temporary find capital injections compatible“

European Commission, “State aid N 194/2009 –United Kingdom: Liquidation Aid to Bradford and Bingley Plc”

Gerard D, „Managing the Financial Crisis in Europe: Why Competition Law is Part of the Solution, Not of the Problem“ at page 6 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1330326

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, “Competition and the Financial Crisis” <http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/52/24/42538399.pdf>

Jörges C and Rödl F, ‘ On De-formalisation in European Politics and Formalism in European Jurisprudence in Response to the “Social Deficit” of the European Integration Project, Reflections after the Judgments of the ECJ in Viking and Laval’ <http://www.hanselawreview.org/pdf6/Vol4No1Art01.pdf>

Kroes N, „Competition Policy and the Crisis – the Commission's Approach to Banking and Beyond“ February 2010 http://ec.europa.eu/competition/publications/cpn/2010_1_1.pdf

Somek A, Idealisation, De-politicisation and Economic Due Process: System Transition In The European Union ) in “The Law/Politics Distinction in Contemporary Public Law Adjudication.” Edited by Iancu B, March 2009