Huhtala, Anni (2004): What price recreation in Finland? – A contingent valuation study of non-market benefits of public outdoor recreation areas. Published in: Journal of Leisure Research , Vol. 36, No. 1 (2004): pp. 23-44.
Download (324kB) | Preview
Basic services in Finnish national parks and state-owned recreation areas have traditionally been publicly financed and thus free of charge for users. Since the benefits of public recreation are not captured by market demand, government spending on recreation services must be motivated in some other way. Here, we elicit people’s willingness to pay (WTP) for services in the country’s state-owned parks to obtain an estimate of the value of outdoor recreation in monetary terms. A variant of the Tobit model is used in the econometric analysis to examine the WTP responses elicited by a payment card format. We also study who the current users of recreation services are in order to enable policymakers to anticipate the redistribution effects of a potential implementation of user fees. Finally, we discuss the motives for WTP, which reveal concerns such as equity and ability to pay that are relevant for planning public recreation in general and for the introduction of fees in particular.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||What price recreation in Finland? – A contingent valuation study of non-market benefits of public outdoor recreation areas|
|Keywords:||non-market valuation; payment card; recreation; recreation fees; taxes; user fees; wllingnes-to-pay; WTP|
|Subjects:||Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q26 - Recreational Aspects of Natural Resources
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q51 - Valuation of Environmental Effects
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C25 - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models ; Discrete Regressors ; Proportions ; Probabilities
|Depositing User:||Huhtala Anni|
|Date Deposited:||24. Aug 2010 13:29|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 00:47|
Adams, R.M., Bergland, O., Musser, W.N., Johnson, S.L., & Musser, L.M. (1989). User fees and equity issues in public hunting expenditures: The case of ring-necked pheasant in Oregon. Land Economics, 65, 376-385.
Bockstael, N.E., McConnell, K.E., & Strand, I.E. (1991). Recreation. In J.B. Braden & C.D. Kolstad (Eds.), Measuring the demand for environmental quality (pp. 227-270). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
Cameron, T.A., & Huppert, D. D. (1987a). Non-market resource valuation: assessment of value elicitation by “payment card” versus “referendum” methods. Paper presented at the Western Economic Association Meetings, July 1987, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Cameron, T.A., & James, M. D. (1987b). Efficient estimation methods for use with “close-ended” contingent valuation survey data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69, 269-276.
Cameron, T.A., & Huppert, D. D. (1989). OLS versus ML estimation of non-market resource values with payment card interval data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 17, 230-246.
Carson, R.T. (1991). Constructed markets. In J.B. Braden & C. D. Kolstad (Eds.) Measuring the demand for environmental quality (pp. 121-162). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
Chistensen, N.A., Stewart, W.P. & King, D.A. (1993). National forest campgrounds: Users willing to pay more. Journal of Forestry, 91, 43-47.
Dudewicz, E.J. & Mishra, S.N. (1988). Modern mathematical statistics. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons.
Gartner, W.C. & Lime, D.W. (2000). Trends in outdoor recreation, leisure and tourism. Wallingford: CABI Publishing.
Gray, P.A., Duwors, E., Villeneuve, M., Boyd, S. & Legg, D. (2000). The socioeconomic significance of nature-based recreation in Canada. Paper presented at the Tenth Annual Conference of Canadian Resource and Environmental Economics Study Group (CREE), October 2000, University of Guelph, Ontario
Greene, W.H. (1998). User’s manual, LIMDEP version 7.0. Econometric Software Inc.
Gujarati, D.N. (1995). Basic econometrics. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
Hanemann, W.M. (1978). Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Hanemann, W.M. (1992). Preface. In Navrud S. (Ed.) Pricing the European environment (pp. 9-35). Oxford: Scandinavian University Press/Oxford University Press.
Herriges, J. & Kling, C. (1999). Valuing recreation and the environment: Revealed preference methods in theory and practice. Aldershot: New Horizons/Edward Elgar Press.
Huhtala, A. (2001). What price recreation in Finland? An econometric analysis of completely censored and skewed willingness-to-pay data. Paper presented at the Eleventh Annual Conference of European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, July 2001, University of Southampton, United Kingdom.
Johansson, P.-O. (1987). The economic theory and measurement of environmental benefits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L., & Thaler, R.H. (1991). The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 193-206.
Kolstad, C.D., & Braden, J.B. (1991). Environmental demand theory. In J.B. Braden & C.D. Kolstad (Eds.) Measuring the demand for environmental quality (pp.17-39). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
Marion, J.L. and T.A. Farrell (2002). Management practices that concentrate visitor activities: Camping impact management at Isle Royal National Park, USA. Journal of Environmental Management, 66, 201-212.
Matulich, S.C., Workman, W.G., & Jubenville, A. (1987). Recreation economics: Taking stock. Land Economics, 63, 310-316.
McConnell, K.E. (1985). The economics of outdoor recreation. In A.V. Kneese & J.I. Sweeney (Eds.) Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics, vol. II. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
Menz, F.C., & Mullen, J.K. (1981). Expected encounters and willingness to pay for outdoor recreation, Land Economics, 57, 33-40.
Mitchell, R.C. & Carson, R.T. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method. Washington D.C.: Resources for the Future.
More, T.A. (1999). A functionalist approach to user fees. Journal of Leisure Research, 31, 227-244.
Mäntymaa, E. (1997). Essays on environmental benefits and hypothetical markets. Department of Economics, G2, Acta Universitatis Ouluensis Oeconomica, Oulu, Finland.
Ovaskainen, V., Horne, P., & Sievänen, T. (1999a). Funding alternatives and valuation of public land recreation services, Finnish Forest Sector Economic Outlook 1999-2000, Finnish Forest Research Institute.
Ovaskainen, V., Horne, P., & Sievänen, T. (1999b). Evon ja Teijon retkeilyalueiden kävijät ja kävijätyytyväisyys kesäkaudella 1996. (Visitors and visitor satisfaction in the Evo and Teijo Hiking Areas in 1996, in Finnish) Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research Papers 726.
Richer, J.R., & Christensen, N.A. (1999). Appropriate fees for wilderness day use: Pricing decisions for recreation on public land. Journal of Leisure Research, 31, 269-280.
Rosenberger, R.S., & Loomis, J.B. (2001). Benefit transfer of outdoor recreation use values: A technical document supporting the Forest Service Strategic Plan. Gen.Tech.Rep. RMRS-GTR-72. Fort Collins, CO: Department of Agriculture, Forest service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
Sievänen, T. (Ed.) Outdoor recreation 2000 (2001). Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research Reports 802 (in Finnish, Executive summary in English).
Sievänen, T., Pouta, E., & Ovaskainen, V. (1992). Problems of measuring recreation value given everyman's rights. In B. Solberg (Ed.) Scandinavian Forest Economics, 33, 231-243.
Tyrväinen, L. (1999). Monetary valuation of urban forest amenities in Finland. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Joensuu, Finland.
Virtanen, V. (2000). Fishing Finnish fishermen – Data collection for the Finnish Outdoor Recreation Survey 1998-2000. Paper presented at the International Symposium on National Recreation Surveys and Assessments in Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Walsh, R.G. (1986). Recreation economic decisions: comparing benefits and costs. Venture, State College, PA.
Walsh, R.G., Loomis, J.B., & Gillman, R.A. (1984). Valuing option, existence, and bequest demands for wilderness, Land Economics, 60, 14-29.
Wilman, E.A. (1988). Pricing policies for outdoor recreation. Land Economics, 64, 234-241.