Gao, Song (2010): Privatization, Soft Budget Constraint, and Social Burdens: A Random-Effects Stochastic Frontier Analysis on Chinese Manufacturing Technical Efficiency.
Download (902kB) | Preview
Traditional panel stochastic frontier studies on privatization of Chinese State-owned firms face a major challenge, namely, the endogeneity problem. The endogeneity problem is present because decision-making process of privatization in China is very likely influenced by some unobserved characteristics of a firm. In particular, better-performing SOEs are more likely to be chosen for privatization because the local governments may have incentives to attract private investors or to retain momentum for future reform. To deal with this challenge, this paper proposes a two-step stochastic frontier model. The first step addresses the endogeneity issue by estimating the probability of privatization with a random effects probit model. The second step estimation investigates the causes of Chinese manufacturing’s inefficiency with a random-effects stochastic frontier model. The estimation results suggest that privatization, hardening budget constraint and reducing firms’ social obligations have significantly contributed to the improvements of firms’ efficiency. However, no evidence is found that more autonomy for managers and lower debt asset ratio may help improve firms’ efficiency.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Privatization, Soft Budget Constraint, and Social Burdens: A Random-Effects Stochastic Frontier Analysis on Chinese Manufacturing Technical Efficiency|
|Keywords:||Panel data, random effects, technical efficiency, stochastic frontier, privatization, soft-budget constraint, managerial incentives, social burdens|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O53 - Asia including Middle East
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables
P - Economic Systems > P3 - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions > P31 - Socialist Enterprises and Their Transitions
|Depositing User:||Song Gao|
|Date Deposited:||06. Sep 2010 00:19|
|Last Modified:||01. Jan 2016 00:53|
Aigner, D., Lovell, C., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier Production function models. Journal of Econometrics , 6, 21-37.
Balfour, F. (2009, July 29). Rioting Chinese Steel Workers Kill Boss Over Layoffs. Business Week .
Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1995). A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data. Empirical Economics , 20, 325-332.
Brown, D. J. (2006). the productivity effects of privatization: longitudinal estimates from Hungary, Romania, Russia, and Ukraine. Journal of Political Economy , 114 (11), 61-99.
Chun, L. (2008). Against Privatization in China: A Historical and Empirical Argument. Journal of Chinese Political Science , 13 (1), 1-27.
Cornwell, C., Schmidt, P., & Sickles, R. C. (1990). Production frontiers with cross-sectional and time-series variation in efficiency levels. Journal of Econometrics , 46 (1-2), 185-200.
Dong, X., Putterman, L., & Unel, B. (2006). Privatization and firm performance: A comparison between rural and urban enterprises in China. Journal of Comparative Economics , 34 (3), 608-633.
Greene, W. (2008). The Econometric Approach to Efficiency Analysis. In K. L. H. Fried, The Measurement of Efficiency (pp. 92-250). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Guo, K., & Yao, Y. (2005). Causes of Privatization in China: Testing Several Hypotheses. Economics of Transition , 13 (2), 211-238.
Ito, J. (2005). Economic and Institutional Reform Packages and Their Impact on Productivity: A Case Study of Chinese Township and Village Enterprises. Journal of Comparative Economics , 1-24.
Jefferson, G. H., & Su, J. (2003). The Impact of Shareholding Reform on Chinese Enterprise, 1995-2001 . William Davidson Institute Working Paper No. 542 .
Lau, C.-m. (1998). Strategic Orientations of Chief Executives in State-Owned Enterprises in Transition. In J. R. Micahel Hitt, Managing Strategically in an Interconnected World (pp. 101-117). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
Lee, Y., & Schmidt, P. (1993). A Production Frontier Model with Flexible Temporal Variation in Technical Efficiency. In H. Fried, K. Lovell, & S. Schmidt, The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Liu, G. S., & Sun, P. (2003). Identifying Ultimate COntrolling Shareholders in Chinese Public Corporations: An Empirical Survey. Asia Programme Working Paper 2, The Royal Institute of International Affairs .
Otchere, I. a. (2001). Privatization, Efficiency and Intra-industry Effects: Analysis of China's Privatization. International Review of Finance , 2, 49-70.
Pitt, M. M., & Lee, L. F. (1981). The measurement and sources of technical inefficiency in the Indonesian weaving industry. Journal of Development Economics , 9, 43-64.
Schmidt, P., & Sickles, R. (1984). Production Frontiers and Panel Data. Journal of Business and Statistics , 2, 367-374.
W, M., & Broeck, J. v. (1977). Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review , 18, 435-444.
Yusuf, S., Nabeshima, K., & Perkins, D. H. (2006). Under New Ownership: Privatizing China's State-Owned Enterprises. Washington, DC: Stanford University Press.