Sukati, Mphumuzi A (2010): The Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) and the Southern African Customs Union (SACU) Region- The Case for South Africa.
Download (856kB) | Preview
EPAs between the EU and ACP countries can be viewed as being anti mercantilist and there has been a lot of speculations about their outcome. The aim of the study is to determine the effects of the Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) between the European Union (EU) and the Southern African Customs Union (SACU) members using Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) version 7. Two scenarios are analysed: first when the other SACU member states sign the EPAs with the EU excluding South Africa and secondly when the entire SACU member states including South Africa sign a full EPA with the EU. Results show that South Africa does stand to lose when the other member states sign. However, signing of the EPA of the SACU as a bloc, including South Africa result in welfare gain in the region. Significantly, there is an increased export of livestock and processed foods to the EU from SACU region meaning that the region stands to gain in promoting these industries after an EPA. Besides these two sectors, most of the other sectors tend to lose out. It should be noted that full benefits of trade liberalisation agreements depend on speed of industry reform and therefore can only be realised in the long run.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||The Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) and the Southern African Customs Union (SACU) Region- The Case for South Africa|
|Keywords:||Economic Partnership Agreements; South African Customs Union; Welfare gains; European Union; GTAP|
|Subjects:||A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A13 - Relation of Economics to Social Values
A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics > A23 - Graduate
A - General Economics and Teaching > A3 - Collective Works > A31 - Collected Writings of Individuals
B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B0 - General > B00 - General
A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A11 - Role of Economics ; Role of Economists ; Market for Economists
|Depositing User:||Mphumuzi Sukati|
|Date Deposited:||19. Sep 2010 02:12|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 23:55|
1.Development Network Africa (2007). ‘Evaluation of an Appropriate Model for a SADC Customs Union.’ Report Commissioned by The SADC Secretariat
2.Flatters F, Stern M (2005). ‘Implementing the SACU Revenue-Sharing Formula: Customs Revenues.’ Policy briefing prepared for the South Africa National Treasury, under the Trade Policy Development Project (TPDP) and Support for Economic Growth and Analysis (SEGA II) SACU Secretariat, South Africa National Treasury, any other SACU Member State, USAID, or any of their officials or representatives.
3.Hertel T (1997). Purdue University. ‘Global Trade Analysis: Modelling and Application.’ Cambridge University Press, Cambridge CB2 1RP
4.Kuik O, Gerlagh R (2003). ‘Trade Liberalisation and Carbon Leakage.’ The Energy Journal, Vol. 24, No. 3.
5.Meyn M (2004). ‘The EU – South Africa FTA and its effect on EPA negotiations’ Institute for World Economics and International Management (IWIM),University of Bremen: Conference paper prepared for the European Community Studies Association in Southern Africa: “The relationship between Africa and the European Union”, University of Western Cape, January 22nd-23rd, 2004.
6.Milner C et al (2006). ‘Some Simple Analytics of the Trade and Welfare Effects of Economic Partnership Agreements.’ Journal of African Economics, Volume 14, Number 3 pp. 327-358.
7.Milner C, Morrissey C, Zgovu E (2007). ‘Adjusting to Bilateral Trade Liberalization under an EPA: Evidence for Mauritius.’ Centre for Research in Economic Development and International Trade (CREDIT) Research Paper. University of Nottingham
8.Morrissy O, Zgovu E (2007). ‘The Impact of Economic Partnership Agreements on ACP Agricultural Imports and Welfare.’ Centre for Research in Economic Development and International Trade (CREDIT) Research Paper. University of Nottingham
9.Stevens C, Kennan J (2005). ‘EU-ACP Economic Partnership Agreements: The effects of Reciprocity’: Institute of Development Studies, Sussex
10.United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD, 2001). ‘Improving Market Access for Least Developed Countries.’ UNCTAD/DITC/TNCD/4
11.Vollmer S et al (2008). ‘EU-ACP ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENTS: Empirical Evidence for Sub-Saharan Africa.’ World Development Report 2009 – Development in 3D: Density, Distance, Division