Berg, Nathan (2002): Behavioral cost-benefit economics: Toward a new normative approach to policy. Published in: In Kantarelis, D. (ed.), Global Business & Economics Review-Anthology (2002): pp. 132-141.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_26370.pdf Download (138kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper addresses the question of whether the findings of behavioral economics imply that techniques used in cost-benefit analysis should be modified. The findings of behavioral economics considered include the status-quo effect, loss-aversion, overconfidence and hyperbolic discounting. These behavioral phenomena do indeed imply that concepts from cost-benefit analysis such as consumer surplus, the Kaldor-Hicks criterion, shadow-price valuation, and time discounting, need to be modified. The most important modifications follow from the status-quo effect, which provides a new reason to reject policy proposals that yield only small percentage benefits relative to costs.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Behavioral cost-benefit economics: Toward a new normative approach to policy |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Cost-Benefit Analysis, Behavioral Economics, Status-Quo Effect, Loss Aversion, Overconfidence, Hyperbolic Discounting |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles |
Item ID: | 26370 |
Depositing User: | Nathan Berg |
Date Deposited: | 04 Nov 2010 09:14 |
Last Modified: | 15 Oct 2019 04:58 |
References: | Abel, Andrew B., and Ben S. Bernanke, Macroeconomics, 4th ed. (Boston: Addison Wesley, 2001). Daniel, K., D. Hirshleifer, and A. Subrahmanyam, “Investor Psychology and Security Market Under- and Overreactions,” Journal of Finance. Vol. 53, No. 6, 1998, pp.1839–1885. Kahneman, Daniel, Jack L. Knetsch, and Richard H. Thaler, “The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias: Anomalies,” Journal of Economic Perspectives,Vol. 5, No. 1, 1991, pp.193-206. Kahneman, Daniel, Jack L. Knetsch, and Richard H. Thaler, “Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, No. 6, 1990, pp.1325-48. Knetsch, Jack L., “Assumptions, Behavioral Findings, and Policy Analysis,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 14, No.1, 1995, pp.68-78. Kunreuther, Howard, “Mitigating Disaster Losses Through Insurance,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 12, No. 2, 1996, pp.171-87. Laibson, David, and Richard Zeckhauser, “Amos Tversky and the Ascent of Behavioral Economics,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1998, pp.7-47. Mas-Colell, Andreu, Michael D. Whinston, and Jerry R. Green, Microeconomic Theory, (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995). Rabin, M., “Psychology and Economics,” Working Paper, University of California at Berkeley, 1996. Schwartz, Hugh H., Rationality Gone Awry? Decision Making Inconsistent with Economic and Financial Theory, (Westport: Praeger, 1998). Simon, Herbert, Models of Man, (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1957). |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/26370 |