Co-operative and competitive enforced self regulation: the role of governments, private actors and banks in corporate responsibility

Ojo, Marianne (2010): Co-operative and competitive enforced self regulation: the role of governments, private actors and banks in corporate responsibility. Forthcoming in: Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance

Abstract

In considering why practices which stimulate incentives for private agents to exert corporate control should be encouraged, this paper highlights criticisms attributed to government control of banks. However the theory relating to the “helping hand” view of government is advanced as having a fundamental role in the regulation and supervision of banks. Furthermore, governments have a vital role to play in corporate responsibility and regulation given the fact that banks are costly and difficult to monitor – this being principally attributed to the possibility that private agents will lack required incentives or the ability to supervise banks. Through its supervision of banks, governments also assume an important role where matters related to the fostering of accountability are concerned – not only because banks may have the power to affect firm performance, but also because some private agents are not able to afford internal monitoring mechanisms.

Through the Enforced Self Regulation model, the paper attempts to highlight the role played by government in the direct monitoring of firms. In proposing the Co-operative and Competitive Enforced Self Regulation model, it attempts to draw attention to the fact that although such a model is based on a combination of already existing models and theories, the absence of effective enforcement mechanisms will restrict the maximisation potential of such a model.

The primary theme of the paper relates to how corporate responsibility and accountability could be fostered through monitoring and the involvement of governments in the regulation of firms. It illustrates how structures which operate in various systems, namely, stock market economies and universal banking systems, function (and attempt) to address gaps which may arise as a result of lack of adequate mechanisms of accountability. Furthermore it draws attention to the impact of asymmetric information (generally and in these systems), on levels of monitoring procedures and how conflicts of interests which could arise between banks and their shareholders, or between governments and those firms being regulated by the regulator, could be addressed.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: accountability; asymmetric information; universal banking; regulation; regulatory capture; government
• Subjects: K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law; G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G18 - Government Policy and Regulation; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information ; Mechanism Design; G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance; A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A10 - General; G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G21 - Banks ; Depository Institutions ; Micro Finance Institutions ; Mortgages; L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance

References

Ayres I and Braithwaite J, Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate Oxford University Press

Barth JR, Caprio G Jr, and Levine R, “Bank Regulation and Supervision: What Works Best?”

Braithwaite J, Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation (2002) Oxford University Press

Coglianese C, Healey TJ , Keating EK and Michael ML, „The Role of Government in Corporate Governance“ Regulatory Policy Program Center for Business and Government

Dowd K, “Does Asymmetric Information Justify Bank Capital Adequacy Regulation?” Cato Journal Volume 19 No 1 1999

Edwards J and Nibler M, „Corporate Governance in Germany: The Role of Banks and Ownership Concentration“ 2000 Journal of Economic Policy Volume 31

Esty DC and Geradin D, „Regulatory Competition and Economic Integration: Comparative Perspectives” 2001 Oxford University Press

Financial Services Authority, “ The Financial Services Practitioner Panel : Statutory Role” http://www.fs-pp.org.uk/stat_role.htm

Financial Services Authority, “The Financial Services Consumer Panel: An Independent Voice for Consumers of Financial Services” (Annual Report 2004/2005)

Genschel P and Plümper T, „Regulatory Competition and International Co operation“ December 1997 Journal of European Public Policy Volume 4 No 4

Genschel P and Plümper T, “Wenn Reden Silber und Handeln Gold ist: Kooperation und Kommunikation in der internationalen Bankenregulierung” Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 3:225-253

Gorton G and Schmid F, „Universal Banking and the Performance of German Firms“ NBER Working Paper 5453, 1996

Grabosky P and Braithwaite J Of Manners Gentle: Enforcement Strategies of Australian Business Regulatory Agencies, (1986) Oxford University Press, Melbourne

Gunningham N and Grabosky P Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy (1998) Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Hadjiemmanuil C, Banking Regulation and the Bank of England 1995 (Lloyds of London Press)

Keohane RO, „Multi lateralism: An Agenda For Research“ International Journal Volume 45 No 4 at pages 731 - 764

La Porta R, Lopez de Silanes F and Shleifer A, “Government Ownership of Banks” 2000 Working Paper 7620

Llewellyn D, “The Economic Rationale for Financial Regulation” (FSA London Occasional Paper 1 April 1999)

Martin L “The Rational State Choice of Multi lateralism” in John Gerard Ruggie (ed) Multi lateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form (1993) New York: Columbia University Press

Miles D, ‘‘Optimal Regulation of Deposit Taking Financial Intermediaries’’ (1995) European Economic Review 39: 1365–84

Ojo M, “The Impact of Capital and Disclosure Requirements on Risks and Risk Taking Incentives” February 2010

Ojo M, “The Financial Services Authority: A Model of Improved Accountability” Global Journal of Business Research (2007) Volume 1No 1 at pages 83 - 96

Pan EJ, „Harmonization of U.S – E.U Securities Regulation: The Case for a Single European Securities Regulator”. Law and Policy in International Business

Pigou AC, The Economics of Welfare (1938) 4th Edition London: MacMillan and Co

Pigou A, The Economics of Welfare Volume 1 2005

Posner R“Theories of Economic Regulation” (1974) 5 Bell Journal of Economics and Management at pages 335-358

Romano R, “Is Regulatory Competition a Problem or Irrelevant for Corporate Governance ?” March 2005 ECGI Law Working Paper Series Working Paper No 26/2005

Shelton JR, The OECD Report on Regulatory Reform 1997 Volume 1: Sectoral Studies

Shleifer A and Vishny R The Grabbing Hand: Government Pathologies and their Cures, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Xie L, “Universal Banking, Conflicts of Interest and Firm Growth” 2007