Veldhoven, Joris and Cloodt, Myriam and Vanhaverbeke, Wim (2008): Modeling the set-up and management of a spin-out: Evidence from a case study.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_26489.pdf Download (276kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this paper we explore a special case of venturing, namely the spinout approach. More in particular, this paper has sought to model the spin-out process by combining scholarly literature with an empirical analysis of the spinout process of Royal Dutch Shell. Through literature review we have identified multiple factors relevant for spinout success, which are captured in a practical assessment model. In doing so, we have provided managers with a phased approach showing the critical steps that have to be taken in the decision, set-up and management phases of a spinout. The added value of the introduced assessment model is that it treats a spinout as an ongoing process of enacting set-ups, rather than a static event.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Modeling the set-up and management of a spin-out: Evidence from a case study |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | spin-out; phased exit; external corporate venturing |
Subjects: | M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration > M13 - New Firms ; Startups D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D85 - Network Formation and Analysis: Theory O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives |
Item ID: | 26489 |
Depositing User: | Wim Vanhaverbeke |
Date Deposited: | 08 Nov 2010 10:48 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 09:23 |
References: | Agarwal, R., Echambadi, R., Franco, A.M. & Sarkar, M.B. (2004), Knowledge transfer through inheritance: spin-out generation, growth, and survival, Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 501-522. Block, Z. & MacMillan, I.C. (1993). Corporate venturing: creating new businesses within the firm. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Burgelman, R., Christensen, C., & Wheelright, S. (2004). Strategic management of technology and innovation. Boston: McGraw Hill Irwin. Chesbrough, H. (2003a). Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Chesbrough, H. (2003b). The governance and performance of Xerox's technology spin-off companies. Research Policy, 32, 403-422. Chesbrough, H. & Tucci, C. (2004). Corporate venture capital in the context of corporate innovation. Copenhagen: paper presented at DRUID Summer Conference 2004. Chiesa, V. & Piccaluga, A. (2000). Exploitation and diffusion of public research: the case of academic spin-off companies in Italy. R&D Management, 30, 329-340. Dahlstrand, A. L. (1997). Growth and inventiveness in technology-based spin-off firms. Research Policy, 26, 331-344. Davenport, S., Carr, A., & Bibby, D. (2002). Leveraging talent: spin-off strategy at Industrial Research. R&D Management, 32, 241-254. De Man, A.P. (2006). Alliantiebesturing: samenwerking als precisie-instrumenten. Assen: Van Gorcum. Drucker, P. F. (1974). Management, tasks, responsibilities, practices. New York: Harper & Row. Dushnitsky, G. & Lenox, M.J. (2005). When do firms undertake R&D by investing in new ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 26(10), 947-965. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management review, 14, 25-32. Ernst, H., Witt, P., & Brachtendorf, G. (2005). Corporate venture capital as a strategy for external innovation: an exploratory empirical study. R & D Management, 35, 233-242. Gawer, A. & Cusumano, M.A. (2002). Platform leadership; how Intel, Microsoft and Cisco drive industry innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Gompers, P. (2002). Corporations and the financing of innovation: the corporate venturing experience. Economic Review, 87, 1-18. Gompers, P. & Lerner, J. (2001). The venture capital revolution. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 145–168. Govindarajan, V. & Trimble, C. (2005). 10 rules for strategic innovators from idea to execution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Hellman, T. (2007). When do employees become entrepreneurs?, Management Science, 53 (6), 919-933. Iansiti, M. & Levien, R. (2004). The keystone advantage: what the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Ito, K. (1995). Japanese spinoffs: unexplored survival strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 431-446. Jagersma, P.K. & van Gorp, D.M. (2003). Spin-out management: theory and practice. Business Horizons, March-April, 15-24. Jick, T.D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 747-767. Katila, R., Rosenberger, J., & Eisenhardt, K. (2008). Swimming with Sharks: Technology Ventures, Defense Mechanisms, and Corporate Relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(2), 295-332. Klepper, S. (2009). Spinoffs: a review and synthesis, European Management Review, 6, 159-171. Ledbetter, A. & Zipkin, I. (2002). Achieving venture returns through corporate spinouts. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 8, 339-347. Lee, T. W. (1999). Using qualitative methods in organizational research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., & Sablynski, C.J. (1999). Qualitative research in organizational and vocational psychology: 1979-1999. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55, 161-187. Lord, M. C., Mandel, S. W., & Wager, J.D. (2002). Spinning out a star. Harvard Business Review, 80, 115-121. Mason, H. & Rohner, T. (2002). The venture imperative; a new model for corporate innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Maula, M., Keil, T., & Zahra, S.A. (2003). Corporate venture capital and recognition of technological discontinuities. Seattle: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management. McElroy, D. (2003). Strategic planning - giving your spinout the right spin. Nature Biotechnology, 21, 39-43. McKendrick, M.G., Wade, J.B., & Jaffee, J. (2009). A good riddance? spin-offs and the technological performance of parent firms. Organization Science, 20, 979-992. Rothaermel, F. T. (2001). Incumbent's advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 687-699. Sahaym, A., Steensma, H.K., & Barden, J.Q. (2009). The influence of R&D investment on the use of corporate venture capital: An industry-level analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, forthcoming. Siegel, D.S., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2007). The rise of entrepreneurial activity at universities: organizational and societal implications. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16, 489-504. Teece, D.J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319-1350. Timmons, J. & Spinelli, S. (2008). New venture creation: entrepreneurship for the 21st century. Europe: McGraw-Hill Education. Tubke, A., Saavedra, P., & Gonzalez, J. (2004). Towards a first spin-off typology and a new concept for corporate spin-off research. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 3, 263-290. Van de Vrande, V., Lemmens, C., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2006). Choosing governance modes for external technology sourcing. R&D Management, 36, 347-363. Vanhaverbeke, W. & Peeters, N. (2005). Embracing innovation as strategy: the role of new business development in corporate renewal. Journal of Creativity and Innovation Management, 14, 246-257. Yin, R.K. (1994). Case study research, design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/26489 |