Osberghaus, Daniel and Finkel, Elyssa and Pohl, Max (2010): Individual Adaptation to Climate Change: The Role of Information and Perceived Risk.
Download (427kB) | Preview
Given that many of the predicted effects of climate change are considered imminent and unavoidable, the need to mainstream adaptation as a viable coping measure among private households is becoming a topic of increasing importance. However, little research to date has assessed the factors influencing the motivation to autonomously adapt, nor any successful measures for instigating this behavioural change. This study investigates whether providing locally-focused vs. globally-focused information about the effects of climate change influences the personal perceived risk (PPR) of individual people. Based on a socio-psychological model, Protection Motivation Theory (PMT), it is hypothesized that a higher PPR will lead to a higher motivation to adapt. While this hypothesis has been empirically confirmed by the study, it has been found that providing information on climate change effects that is more personally relevant to the individual and is concerned with his local surroundings does not significantly increase PPR. This may be due to a trade-off between spatial-temporal distance and the comparably low severity of predicted effects in the study region. Interestingly, providing any kind of information, irrespective of having a global or local focus, also did not increase PPR as compared to receiving no information. These results suggest that the sole provision of information about expected climate change impacts, even if tailored to one‟s individual context, does not significantly increase PPR and consequently the motivation to adapt. Another necessary factor might be increasing the knowledge about concrete coping options to allow people to weigh up their personal options.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Individual Adaptation to Climate Change: The Role of Information and Perceived Risk|
|Keywords:||individual adaptation; perceived risk; adaptation motivation; spatial-temporal distance; information; protection motivation theory|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search ; Learning ; Information and Knowledge ; Communication ; Belief ; Unawareness
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy
|Depositing User:||Daniel Osberghaus|
|Date Deposited:||10. Nov 2010 13:02|
|Last Modified:||15. Mar 2015 15:08|
Adger, N. (2001) Scales of Governance and Environmental Justice For Adaptation and Mitigation of Climate Change. Journal of International Development 13, 921-931.
Adger, W. N., Dessai, S., Goulden, M., Hulme, M., Lorenzoni, I., Nelson D. R., Naess, L. O. Wolf, J. and Wreford, A. (2009) Are There Social Limits to Adaptation to Climate Change? Climatic Change 93, 335-354.
Andreoni, J. (1988) Privately provided Public Goods in a Large Economy: The Limits of Altruism. Journal of Public Economics 35, 57-73.
Andreoni, J. (1990) Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm- Glow Giving. The Economic Journal 100, 464-477.
Bosello, F., Carraro, C. and de Cian, E. (2009) An Analysis of Adaptation as a Response to Climate Change. Working Paper No. 25/2009, Department of Economics, University of Venice.
Chan, J. C. (1996) Estimating the Latent Trait from Likert-type Data: A Comparison of Factor- Analysis, Item Response Theory, and Multidimensional Scaling. The Journal of National Chengchi University 72, 299-320.
Ciscar, J. C. (editor) (2009). Climate Change Impacts in Europe, Final Report of the PESETA Research Project.
Dannenberg, A., Mennel, T., Osberghaus, D. and Sturm, B. (in press) The Role of the Government in Adaptation to Climate Change, Environment and Planning C.
de Bruin, K. C., Dellink, R. B. and Tol, R. S. J. (2009) AD-DICE: an implementation of adaptation in the DICE model. Climatic Change 95, 63-81.
Elster, J. (1989) Social Norms and Economic Theory. Journal of Economic Perspectives 3, No. 4, 99-117. 27
Etkin, D. and Ho, E. (2007) Climate Change: Perceptions and Discourses of Risk. Journal of Risk Research 10, No. 5, 623-641.
Fehr, E. and Schmidt, K. M. (1999) A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, August 1999, 817-868
Floyd, D. L, Prentice-Dunn, S. and Rogers, R. W. (2000) A Meta-Analysis of Research on Protection Motivation Theory, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, No. 2, 407-429.
Fankhauser, S. and Tol, R. S. J. (1997) The Social Costs of Climate Change: The IPCC Second Assessment Report and Beyond. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 1, 385-403.
Lorenzoni, I. and Hulme, M. (2009) Believing is seeing: laypeople‟s views of future socioeconomic and climate change in England and Italy. Public Understanding of Science 18, 383- 400.
Grothmann, T. and Patt, A. (2005) Adaptive capacity and human cognition: The process of individual adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change 15, 199-213.
Grothmann, T. and Reusswig F. (2006), People at Risk of Flooding: Why Some Residents Take Precautionary Action While Others do not. Natural Hazards 38, 101-120.
Hardin, G. (1968) The Tragedy of the Commons. Science 162, 1243-1248.
Henry, G. T. and Gordon, C. S. (2003) Driving Less for Better Air: Impacts of a Public Information Campaign. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 22, No. 1, 45-63.
Holländer, H. (1990) A Social Exchange Approach to Voluntary Cooperation. The American Economic Review 80, No. 5, 1157-1167.
IPCC, 2007a: Climate Change (2007): The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 28 [Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K. B., Tignor, M. and Miller, H. L. (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 996 pp.
IPCC, 2007b, Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., van der Linden, P. J., Hanson, C. E. (eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 976 pp.
IPCC, 2007c: Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., van der Linden, P. J., Hanson, C. E. (eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 7-22. Jaccard, J. and Wan, C. K. (1996) LISREL Approaches to Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression, Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, SAGE University Paper.
Kellstedt, P. M., Zahran, S. and Vedlitz, A. (2008) Personal Efficacy, the Information Environment, and Attitudes Toward Global Warming and Climate Change in the United States. Risk Analysis 28, No. 1, 113-126.
Klein, R. J. T., Nicholls, R. T. and Mimura, N. (1999) Coastal Adaptation to Climate Change: Can the IPCC Technical Guidelines be Applied? Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 4, 239-252.
Kunreuther, H. (1996) Mitigating Disaster Losses through Insurance. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 12, 171-187.
Kroemker, D. and Mosler, H. J. (2002) Human Vulnerability – Factors Influencing the Implementation of Prevention and Protection Measures: An Agent based Approach, Global Environmental Change in Alpine Regions: Recognition, Impact, Adaptation and Mitigation, Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc., 93-112. 29
Leiserowitz, A. (2006) Climate Change Risk Perception and Policy Preferences: The Role of Affect, Imagery and Values. Climatic Change 77, 45-72.
Leiserowitz, A. (2007) Public Perception, Opinion and Understanding of Climate Change: Current Patterns, Trends and Limitations. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
Levin, S. A. (2009) Games, Groups, Norms, and Societies. In Games, Groups, and the Global Good, ed. S. A. Levin. Berlin; London: Springer. 143-153.
Mendelsohn, R. (2000) Efficient Adaptation to Climate Change. Climatic Change 45, No. 3-4, 583-600.
Miller, S. (2001) Public Understanding of Science at the Crossroads, Public Understanding of Science 10, 115-120.
Moser, S. C. and Dilling, L. (2007) Toward the social tipping point: creating a climate for change, in: Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change, Cambridge University Press, 491-516.
Nisbet, M. C. and Myers, T. (2007) The Polls-Trends: Twenty Years of Public Opinion About Global Warming. Public Opinion Quarterly 71, No. 3, 444-470.
Norgaard, K. M. (2006) “People Want to Protect Themselves a Little Bit”: Emotions, Denial and Social Movement Nonparticipation. Sociological Inquiry 76, No. 3, 372–396.
Norman, P., Boer, H., and Seydel, E. R. (2005) Protection motivation theory. In: Predicting Health Behaviour: Research and Practice with Social Cognition Models. Open University Press, Maidenhead, pp. 81-126.
Ostrom, E. (2000) Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14, No. 3, 137-158. 30
Ostrom, E. (2009) A Polycentric Approach for Coping with Climate Change. Policy Research Working Paper 5095, The World Bank.
Papke, L. E. and Wooldridge, J. M. (1996) Econometric Methods for Fractional Response Variables with an Application to 401(k) Plan Participation Rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics 11, 619-632.
Rogers, R. W. (1975) A Protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change, Journal of Pschology 91, 93-114.
Rogers, R. W. and Maddux, J. E. (1983) Protection Motivation and Self-Efficacy: A Revised Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology 19, 469-479.
Rogers, R. W. and Prentice-Dunn, S. (1997). Protection motivation theory, In: Gochman, D. S. (Eds.), Handbook of Health Behavior Research. I: Personal and Social Determinants (pp. 113–132). New York, NY: Plenum.
Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J. and Griskevicius, V. (2007) The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms. Psychological Science 18, No. 5, 429-434.
Smit, B. and O. Pilifosova. 2003. From adaptation to adaptive capacity and vulnerability reduction. In J. Smith, R. T. J. Klein and S. Huq (eds.), Climate Change, Adaptive Capacity and Development. London: Imperial College Press, 9-28.
Smit, B. and Wandel, J. (2006) Adaptation, Adaptive Capacity and Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16, 282-292.
Stern, N. (2007), The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge University Press.
Sturgis, P. and Allum, N. (2004) Science in Society: Re-Evaluating the Deficit Model of Public Attitudes. Public Understanding of Science 13, 55-74. 31
Sugden, R. (1984) The Supply of Public Goods through Voluntary Contributions. The Economic Journal 94, No. 376, 772-787. Tol, R. S. J. (2005) Adaptation and mitigation: trade-offs in substance and methods. Environmental Science and Policy 8, No. 6, 572-578.
Weisskopf, M. G., Anderson, H. A., Foldy, S., Hanrahan, L. P., Blair, K., Török, T. J. and Rumm, P. D. (2002) Heat Wave Morbidity and Mortality, Milwaukee, Wis, 1999 vs. 1995: An Improved Response? American Journal of Public Health 92, No.5, 830-833.
Wilbanks, T. J. (2003) Integrating Climate Change and Sustainable Development in a Place- Based Context. Climate Policy 3, Sup. 1, 147-154.
Wolf, J., Adger, W. N., Lorenzoni, I., Abrahamson, V., and Raine, R. (2010) Social Capital, Individual Responses to Heat Waves and Climate Change Adaptation: An empirical study of two UK cities. Global Environmental Change 20, 44-52.
World Development Report (2010) Overcoming Behavioral and Institutional Inertia. World Development Report 2010, Washington DC: The World Bank.
Wright, N. and Nerlich, B. (2006) Use of the Deficit Model in a Shared culture of Argumentation: the Case of Foot and Mouth Science. Public Understanding of Science 15, 331-342.