Böhme, Enrico and Müller, Christopher (2010): Price-Increasing Competition on Two-Sided Markets with Homogeneous Platforms.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_26938.pdf Download (349kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We make a case for price-increasing competition on “competitive bottleneck” two-sided markets. Unlike previous literature on price-increasing competition and two-sided markets, we abstract from product/platform differentiation, structural differences, scale effects, search costs, and capacity constraints, which would per se favor the one or the other market structure. We argue that demand interrelation as given on many competitive bottleneck two- sided markets might be sufficient to cause either no observable price effect of competition or price-increasing competition under certain conditions. We derive these conditions and illustrate the economic intuition. Under price equality, virtually everything except for the number of platform operators is identical in monopoly and duopoly. Nevertheless, total demand on both market sides in the duopoly market exceeds total demand in the monopoly market. Furthermore, even though there is no observable price effect, there is still a competitive effect that becomes manifest in total duopoly equilibrium profits being strictly smaller than monopoly profits. The relationship of total welfare is ambiguous in subsidization cases, while it is strictly greater in duopoly, if no subsidization takes place.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Price-Increasing Competition on Two-Sided Markets with Homogeneous Platforms |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | two-sided markets, platform competition, price-concentration relationship, welfare analysis |
Subjects: | K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law > K20 - General L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy > L51 - Economics of Regulation L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D42 - Monopoly D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L12 - Monopoly ; Monopolization Strategies |
Item ID: | 26938 |
Depositing User: | Christopher Mueller |
Date Deposited: | 23 Nov 2010 20:59 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 16:47 |
References: | Anderson, S. P., & Gabszewicz, J. J. (2006). The media and advertising: a tale of two-sided markets. In V. A. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of art and culture. North-Holland: Elsevier. Armstrong, M. (2006). Competition in two-sided markets. RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 668-691. Caillaud, B., & Jullien, B. (2003). Chicken & egg: competition among intermediation service providers. RAND Journal of Economics, 34(2), 309-328. Chaudhri, V. (1998). Pricing and efficiency of a circulation industry: The case of newspapers. Information Economics and Policy, 10(1), 59-76. Danaher, P. J. (1995). What happens to television ratings during commercial breaks? Journal of Advertising Research, 37(1), 37-47. Dewenter, R. (2006). Das Konzept der zweiseitigen Märkte am Beispiel von Zeitungsmonopolen. Hamburg: Department of Economics, Helmut-Schmidt-University of the Federal Armed Forces. Gabszewicz, J. J., Laussel, D., & Sonnac, N. (1999). TV-broadcasting competition and advertising: Centre de Recherche en Economie et Statistique, Université Catholique de Louvain. Häckner, J., & Nyberg, S. (2008). Advertising and media market concentration. Journal of Media Economics, 21(2), 79-96. Kaiser, U., & Song, M. (2009). Do media consumers really dislike advertising? An empirical assessment of the role of advertising in print media markets. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 27(2), 292-301. Nilssen, T., & Sørgard, L. (2001). The TV industry: advertising and programming. Oslo: Department of Economics, University of Oslo. Picard, R. G. (1989). Media economics. Concepts and issues. Newbury Park, London, New Delhi: Sage. Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990-1029. Rysman, M. (2004). Competition between networks: a study of the market for yellow pages. Review of Economic Studies, 71(2), 483-512. Weyl, E. G. (2006). The price theory of two-sided markets. Princeton: Bendheim Center for Finance, Department of Economics, Princeton University. Wilbur, K. C. (2007). A two-sided, empirical model of television advertising and viewing markets. Los Angeles: University of Southern California. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/26938 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Comparing Monopoly and Duopoly on a Two-Sided Market without Product Differentiation. (deposited 30 Jun 2010 01:40)
- Price-Increasing Competition on Two-Sided Markets with Homogeneous Platforms. (deposited 23 Nov 2010 20:59) [Currently Displayed]