For shame! The effect of community cooperative context on the probability of voting

Knack, Stephen and Kropf, Martha (1998): For shame! The effect of community cooperative context on the probability of voting. Published in: Political Psychology , Vol. 19, No. 3 (September 1998): pp. 585-600.

Abstract

The question of why some people vote in American national elections and others do not has been the focus of a vast literature in social science. Numerous empirical regularities have been established, such that we now know "who votes" and who doesn't, in the sense that various demographic characteristics -- most notably education -- are strongly correlated with turnout (Wolfinger and Rosenstone 1980; Teixeira 1987, 1992). A consensus on "why", in the form of theories and evidence on the motives of individuals, has been slower to emerge. This study builds on previous work emphasizing the political relevance of civic norms prescribing social cooperation. In this analysis, we use a county-level variable -- mail-in census response rates -- to measure the strength of civic norms in counties represented in the 1992 American National Election Study (NES), finding that the likelihood of one’s voting increases with the county’s census response rate, controlling for the usual set of factors associated with turnout. We explore one information source by which people may learn about community expectations, the newspaper.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: voting, elections, turnout, social norms
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior; Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification

References

Abramson, P. R., J. H. Aldrich and D. W. Rohde (1990). Change and Continuity in the 1988 Elections. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press.

“An Exercise in Democracy.” The Indianapolis News. November 4, 1996: A6.

Beck, P. A., R. J. Dalton, R. Huckfeldt and S. Nichols (1996). Political Intermediation in Neighborhood Contexts. Paper presented at the 1996 Midwest Political Science Meetings, April 18-20, 1996, Chicago, IL.

Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Coleman, J. S. (1987). Norms as Social Capital. In G. Radnitzky and P. Bernholz, eds. Economic Imperialism: The Economic Method Applied Outside the Field of Economics. New York: Paragon House Publishers.

Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

Giles, M. and M. K. Dantico (1982). Political Participation and Neighborhood Social Context Revisited. American Journal of Political Science 26: 144-150.

“High Turnout for Elections Carries Benefits.” Asheville Citizen-Times. November 4, 1996: A6.

Huckfeldt, R. (1979). Political Participation in the Neighborhood Social Context. American Journal of Political Science.” 23: 579-592.

Huckfeldt, R. and J. R. Sprague (1995). Citizens, Politics and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kenney, C. (1993). The Microenvironment of Political Participation. American Politics Quarterly 21: 223-238.

Knack, S. (1992a). Civic Norms, Social Sanction and Voter Turnout. Rationality and Society 4: 133-156.

Knack, S. (1992b). Social Altruism and Voter Turnout: Evidence From the 1991 NES Pilot Study. National Election Studies Working Paper.

Knack, S. And P. Keefer (1997). Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-National Investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112: 1251-88.

Leighley, J. E. (1990). Social Interaction and Contextual Influences on Political Participation. American Politics Quarterly 18: 459-475.

MacKuen, M. and C. Brown (1987). Political Context and Attitude Change. American Political Science Review 81: 471-490.

Mondak, J. J. (1995). Nothing to Read: Newspapers and Elections in a Social Experiment. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Mueller, D. C. (1989). Public Choice II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Putnam, R. D. (1995a). Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America. PS: Political Science and Politics 28: 664-683.

Putnam, R. D. (1995b). Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy 6: 65-78.

Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Putnam, R. D. (1966). Political Attitudes and the Local Community. American Political Science Review 60: 640-654.

Rosenstone, S. J. and J. M. Hansen (1993). Mobilization, Participation and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.

Teixeira, R. A. (1992). The Disappearing American Voter. Washington: Brookings.

Teixeira, R. A. (1987). Why Americans Don’t Vote: Turnout Decline in the United States, 1960-1984. Westport CT: Greenwood Press.

Thompson, J. H. (1991). Definition and Clarification of Mail Return Rates for the 1990 Decennial Census." Census Bureau memorandum, July 2 1991.

Uhlaner, C. J. (1986). Political Participation, Rational Actors and Rationality: A New Approach. Political Psychology 7: 551-573.

USA Counties (1994). CD-ROM. Washington, DC: Census Bureau.

Verba, S., K. L. Schlozman, and H. E. Brady (1995). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

“Why People Don’t Vote and Why Their Reasons Don’t Stand Scrutiny.” Asbury Park Press (Neptune, NJ). November 4, 1996: A18.

Wolfinger, R. E. and S. J. Rosenstone (1980). Who Votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.