Marshall, Liz and Kelly, Alexia (2010): The Time Value of Carbon and Carbon Storage: Clarifying the terms and the policy implications of the debate.
Download (159kB) | Preview
The question of whether there is any value to the temporary storage of carbon is fundamental to climate policy design across a number of arenas, including physical carbon discounting in greenhouse gas accounting, the relative value of temporary carbon offsets, and the value of other carbon mitigation efforts that are known to be impermanent, including deferred deforestation. Quantifying the value of temporary carbon storage depends on a number of assumptions about how the incremental impact (or social cost) of a given ton of carbon emissions is expected to change over time. In 2009, a U.S. government interagency working group was established and assigned the responsibility of calculating social cost of carbon estimates to be used in benefit/cost analysis of regulations impacting carbon dioxide emissions. Those estimates were released in March 2010. This working paper explores what those estimates imply about the value of temporary carbon storage, as well as the implications of those temporary storage values for several critical policy design questions relating to greenhouse gas accounting and biological offsets. This analysis suggests, for instance, that appropriate physical carbon discount rates for carbon accounting may be even lower than the social discount rates often used in intergenerational analyses. In the context of agricultural offsets, the social cost of carbon estimates are used to establish a definition of equivalence between permanent and temporary offsets; equivalence ratios are derived that vary between ~2 and 30, depending on the discount rate used and the length of the temporary offset contract period.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||The Time Value of Carbon and Carbon Storage: Clarifying the terms and the policy implications of the debate|
|Keywords:||temporary carbon storage, time value of carbon, temporary offsets, physical carbon discount rate|
|Subjects:||H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H43 - Project Evaluation ; Social Discount Rate
D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D60 - General
|Depositing User:||Elizabeth Marshall|
|Date Deposited:||15. Dec 2010 09:21|
|Last Modified:||15. Feb 2013 21:05|
Ackerman, F., and E.A. Stanton. 2010. “The social cost of carbon.” Stockholm Environment Institute, 17 pp. Available online at http://www.e3network.org/papers/SocialCostOfCarbon_SEI_20100401.pdf.
Anda, J., A. Golub, and E. Strukova. 2009. “Economics of climate change under uncertainty: Benefits of flexibility.” Energy Policy 37: 1345–1355.
Bigsby, H. 2009. “Carbon banking: Creating flexibility for forest owners.” Forest Ecology and Management 257: 378–383.
Blanco, J.T., and C. Forner. 2000. “Expiring CERs: a proposal to addressing the permanence issue for LUCF projects in the CDM.” Economic and Financial Analysis Group, Ministry of the Environment, Bogotá, Colombia. FCCC/SB/2000/MISC.4/Add.2/Rev.1, 14 September. Available online at http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2000/sbsta/misc08.pdf.
Boscolo, M., J.R. Vincent, and T. Panayotou. 1998. “Discounting costs and benefits in carbon sequestration projects.” Harvard Institute for International Development, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 17 pp.
Chomitz, K. 2000. “Evaluating carbon offsets from forestry and energy projects: how do they compare?” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2357, World Bank Development Research Group, Washington, DC, 25 pp.
Dornburg, V., and G. Marland. 2008. “Temporary storage of carbon in the biosphere does have value for climate change mitigation: a response to the paper by Miko Kirschbaum.” Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 13: 211–217.
Dutschke, M. 2001. “Permanence of CDM forests or non-permanence of land use related carbon credits?” Hamburg Institute of International Economics Discussion Paper. Available online at http://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/hiiedp/26399.html.
Ebeling, J., and M. Yasue. 2008. “Generating carbon finance through avoided deforestation and its potential to create climatic, conservation and human development benefits.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 363: 1917–1924.
Fearnside, P.M. 2002a. “Why a 100-year time horizon should be used for global warming mitigation calculations.” Mitigation and Adaptation Strategy for Global Change 7(1): 19–30.
Fearnside, P.M. 2002b. “Time preference in global warming calculations: a proposal for a unified index.” Ecological Economics 41(1): 21–31.
Fearnside, P.M. 2008. “On the value of temporary carbon: a comment on Kirschbaum.” Mitigation and Adaptation Strategy for Global Change 13: 207–210. Fearnside, P.M., D.A. Lashof, and P. Moura-Costa. 2000. “Accounting for time in mitigating global warming through land-use change and forestry.” Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 5: 239–270.
Federal Interagency Working Group. 2010. “Appendix 15A: Social cost of carbon for regulatory impact analysis under Executive Order 12866.” Available online at http://www2.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial/pdfs/sem_finalrule_appendix15a.pdf.
Guo, J., C.J. Hepburn, R.S.J. Tol, and D. Anthoff. 2006. “Discounting and the social cost of carbon: A closer look at uncertainty.” Environmental Science and Policy 9: 205–216.
Hepburn, C.J., and P. Koundouri. 2006. “Recent advances in discounting: implications for forest economics.” Journal of Forest Economics 13: 169–189.
Herzog, H., K. Caldeira, and J. Reilly. 2003. “An issue of permanence: Assessing the effectiveness of temporary carbon storage.” Climatic Change 59: 293–310.
Hope, C. 2008. “Discount rates, equity weights and the social cost of carbon.” Energy Economics 30: 1011–1019.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2007. “IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007 Synthesis Report.” Available online at http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_and_data_reports.htm#1.
Kirschbaum, M.U.F. 2006. “Temporary carbon sequestration cannot prevent climate change.” Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 11: 1151–1164.
Marechal, K., and W. Hecq. 2006. “Temporary credits: A solution to the potential non-permanence of carbon sequestration in forests?” Ecological Economics 58: 699–716.
Marland, G., and E. Marland. 2009. “Trading permanent and temporary carbon emissions credits: An editorial comment.” Climatic Change 95: 465–468.
Marland, E.S., K. Stellar, and G.H. Marland. 2010. “A distributed approach to accounting for carbon in wood products.” Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 15: 71–91.
Marland, G., K. Fruit, and R. Sedjo. 2001. “Accounting for sequestered carbon: the question of permanence.” Environmental Science & Policy 4: 259–268.
Marshall, L. 2009. “Biofuels and the time value of carbon: Recommendations for GHG accounting protocols.” WRI Working Paper. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC, 13 pp. Available online at http://pdf.wri.org/working_papers/time_value_of_carbon.pdf.
Mignone, B.K., R.H. Socolow, J.L. Sarmiento, and M. Oppenheimer. 2008. “Atmospheric stabilization and the timing of carbon mitigation.” Climatic Change 88: 251–265.
NERA. 2009. “Accounting for differences in the timing of emissions in calculating carbon emissions in calculating carbon intensity for the California Low Carbon Fuels Standard.” Report Prepared for the Renewable Fuels Association. Available online at http://www.ethanolrfa.org/objects/documents/2410/nera_report_time_accounting.pdf.
O’Hare, M., R.J. Plevin, J.I. Martin, A.D. Jones, A. Kendall, and E. Hopson. 2009. “Proper accounting for time increases crop-based biofuels’ greenhouse gas deficit versus petroleum.” Environmental Research Letters 4: 7 pp.
Richards, K.R. 1997. “The time value of carbon in bottom-up studies.” Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 27: S279–S292.
Richards, K.R. 2004. “A brief overview of carbon sequestration economics and policy.” Environmental Management 33(4): 545–558.
Searchinger, T., R. Heimlich, R.A. Houghton, F. Dong, A. Elobeid, J. Fabiosa, S. Tokgoz, D. Hayes, and T.-H. Yu. 2008. “Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land use change.” Science 319(5867): 1238–1240.
Sedjo, R.A., and G. Marland. 2003. “Inter-trading permanent emissions credits and rented temporary carbon emissions offsets: some issues and alternatives.” Climate Policy 3(4): 435–444.
Stavins, R.N., and K.R. Richards. 2005. “The cost of U.S. forest-based carbon sequestration.” Report prepared for the Pew Center on Global Climate Change. Available online at http://www.pewclimate.org/docUploads/Sequest_Final.pdf.
Stern, N. 2007. The economics of climate change. H.M. Treasury, UK. Available online at http://www.occ.gov.uk/activities/stern.htm.
Tol, R. 2003. “Is the uncertainty about climate change too large for expected cost-benefit analysis?” Climatic Change 56: 265–289.
Tol, R. 2008. “The social cost of carbon: Trends, outliers, and catastrophes.” Economics 2 (e-journal). Available online at http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/journalarticles/2008-25.
Van der Werf, G.R., D.C. Morton, R.S. DeFries, J.G.J. Olivier, P.S. Kasibhatla, R.B. Jackson, G.J. Collatz, and J.T Randerson. 2009. “CO2 emissions from forest loss.” Nature Geoscience 2: 737–738.
Van Kooten, G.C., E.J. Engle, J. Manley, and T.M. Smolak. 2004. “How costly are carbon offsts? A meta-analysis of forest carbon sinks.” Department of Economics, University of Victoria, Working Paper 2004-01. Available online at http://ideas.repec.org/p/rep/wpaper/2004-01.html.
Van Kooten, G.C. 2008. “Biological carbon sequestration and carbon trading re-visited.” 12th Congress of the European Association of Agricultural Economists. Available online at http://www.springerlink.com/content/8372834132127434/fulltext.pdf.
Van Kooten, G.C. 2009. “Biological carbon sequestration and carbon trading re-visited.” Climatic Change 95: 449–463.
Weitzman, M.L. 2007. “Role of uncertainty in the economics of catastrophic climate change.” AEI-Brookings Joint Center Working Paper No. 07-11.