Buddin, Richard (2010): How effective are Los Angeles elementary teachers and schools?
Download (217kB) | Preview
This study uses value-added methods to examine the effectiveness of Los Angeles elementary teachers and schools. The results show that teacher effectiveness varies substantially across the school district. Most of the variance in teacher effectiveness is within schools and not across schools. Traditional measures of teacher quality like experience and advanced degrees are weakly related to teacher effectiveness. Teacher effectiveness is more variable in mathematics than in language arts.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||How effective are Los Angeles elementary teachers and schools?|
|Keywords:||teacher quality; teacher effectiveness; student achievement; value-added analysis|
|Subjects:||J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J4 - Particular Labor Markets > J45 - Public Sector Labor Markets
H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H75 - State and Local Government: Health ; Education ; Welfare ; Public Pensions
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J4 - Particular Labor Markets > J44 - Professional Labor Markets ; Occupational Licensing
I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I21 - Analysis of Education
|Depositing User:||Richard Buddin|
|Date Deposited:||10. Dec 2010 22:36|
|Last Modified:||24. Mar 2015 06:08|
Aaronson, D., Barrow, L., Sander, W., 2007. Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago public high schools, Journal of Labor Economics, 25(1), 95-135.
Angrist, J., Guryan, J., 2003. Does Teacher Testing Raise Teacher Quality? Evidence from State Certification Requirements, NBER working paper 9545.
Borjas, G., 1987. Self-selection and the earnings of immigrants, American Economic Review, 77(4), 531-553.
Buddin, R., McCaffrey, D., Kirby, S., Xia, N., 2007. Merit Pay for Florida Teachers: Design and Implementation Issues, Working paper, RAND WR-508-FEA.
Buddin, R., Zamarro, G., 2009. Teacher Qualifications and Student Achievement in Urban Elementary Schools, Journal of Urban Economics, 66, 103-115.
Clotfelter, C., Ladd, H., Vigdor, J., 2007. Teacher Credentials and Student Achievement: Longitudinal Analysis with Student Fixed Effects, Economics of Education Review, 26, 673-682.
Gordon, R., Kane, T., Staiger, D. (2006). Identifying Effective Teachers Using Performance on the Job, Brookings Institution Discussion Paper 2006-1.
Harris, D., Sass, T., 2006. The effects of teacher training on teacher value-added, Working paper, Florida State University.
Hill, C., Bloom, H., Black, A., Lipsey, M. (2008). Empirical Benchmarks for Interpreting Effect Sizes in Research, Child Development Perspectives, Volume 2, Number 3, Pages 172–177.
Jacob, B., Lefgren, L., 2008. Can principals identify effective teachers? Evidence on subjective performance evaluation in education, Journal of Labor Economics, 26(1), 101-136.
Kane, T., Staiger, D. (2008). Estimating Teacher Impacts on Student Achievement: An Experimental Evaluation. NBER Working Paper 14607.
Koedel, C., Betts, J., 2007. Re-examining the role of teacher quality in the educational production function, Working paper, University of California, San Diego.
Le, V., Buddin, R., 2005., Examining the Validity Evidence for California Teacher Licensure Exams, Working paper, RAND WR-334-EDU.
McCaffrey, D., Sass, T., Lockwood, J., and Mihaly, K. (2009). The Inter-Temporal Variability of Teacher Effects Estimates, Education Finance and Policy, Fall 2009, Vol. 4, No. 4: 572–606.
Rivkin, S., Hanushek, E., Kain, J., 2005. Teachers, schools, and academic achievement, Econometrica, 73(2), 417-458.
Todd, P., Wolpin, K., 2003. On the Specification and Estimation of the Production Function for Cognitive Achievement, Economic Journal, 113, F3-F33.