The puzzle of dual class stock in Russia: Explaining the price differential between common and preferred shares

Muravyev, Alexander (2004): The puzzle of dual class stock in Russia: Explaining the price differential between common and preferred shares.

Abstract

This paper attempts to explain a large premium paid on common (voting) shares relative to preferred (non-voting) shares in the Russian stock market. Empirical analysis focuses on two main explanations relating the premium either to the voting right attached to common shares or to differences in liquidity between the two classes of stock. Two avenues through which the right to vote may give rise to the premium are distinguished. First, the presence of private benefits of control and the possibility of control contests may make the votes held by small investors pivotal, and therefore valuable. Second, non-voting shareholders may be expropriated as a class by voting shareholders. Case studies and regression analysis of RTS stock exchange data from 1997-2003 provide support for the control contest model of the premium as well as for the liquidity argument. The study finds no evidence that the premium is related to expropriation of preferred shareholders as a class.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Russia, dual-class stock, voting premium, ownership structure, corporate governance
• Subjects: G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G34 - Mergers ; Acquisitions ; Restructuring ; Corporate Governance; G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G32 - Financing Policy ; Financial Risk and Risk Management ; Capital and Ownership Structure ; Value of Firms ; Goodwill

References

Amihud, Y., and Mendelson, H. (1986) Asset Pricing and the Bid-Ask Spread, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 223-249.

Amihud, Y. and Mendelson, H. (1991), Liquidity, Asset Prices and Financial Policy, Financial Analysts Journal, Vol.47, pp. 56-66.

Barclay, M., and Holderness, C. (1989) Private Benefits from Control of Public Corporations, Journal of FinancialEconomics, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 371-395.

Becht, M., Bolton, P., Roell, A. (2002) Corporate Governance and Control, NBER Working Paper No. 9371.

Bergström, C., and Rydqvist, K. (1990) Ownership of Equity in Dual-Class Firms, Journal of Banking and Finance,Vol. 14, No. 2-3, pp. 255-269.

Black, B., Kraakman, R. and Tarassova, A. (2000) Russian Privatization and Corporate Governance: What Went Wrong? Stanford Law Review, Vol. 52, pp. 1731-1808.

Chung, K., and Kim, J.-K. (1999) Corporate Ownership and the Value of a Vote in an Emerging Market, Journal ofCorporate Finance, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 35-54.

Denis, D., and McConnel, J. (2003) International Corporate Governance, Journal of Financial and QuantitativeAnalysis, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 1-36.

Doidge, C. (2003) U.S. Cross-listings and the Private Benefits of Control: Evidence From Dual Class Firms, Working Paper, Joseph L. Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto.

Dyck, A. and Zingales, L. (2002) Private Benefits of Control: An International Comparison, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 3177.

EBRD (various), Transition Report, various years, EBRD, London.

Franks, J., and Mayer, C. (2001) Ownership and Control of German Corporations, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 14,No. 4, pp. 943-977.

Goetzman, W., Spiegel, M., Ukhov, A. (2003) Modelling and Measuring Russian Corporate Governance: The Case ofRussian Preferred Common Shares, NBER Working Paper No. 9469.

Grossman, S., and Hart, O. (1988) One Share/One Vote and the Market for Corporate Control, Journal of FinancialEconomics, Vol. 20, pp. 175-202.

Hare, P., and Muravyev, A. (2003) Privatization in Russia, in: D. Parker, D. Saal, eds. “International Handbook on Privatization”, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK.

Hoffmann-Burchardi, U. (1999) Corporate Governance Rules and the Value of Control: A Study of German Dual Class Shares, Financial Markets Group Discussion Paper No. 315, London School of Economics.

Jensen, M., Meckling, W. (1976) Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost, and Capital Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 305-360.

Johnson, S., Shleifer, A. (2001) Privatization and Corporate Governance, paper prepared for the 12th Annual East Asian Seminar on Economics, June 28-30, 2001.

Johnson, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. (2000) Tunneling, NBER Working Paper No. 7523.

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A. (1999) Corporate Ownership around the World, Journal of Finance, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 471-517.

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. (1999) Investor Protection and Corporate Valuation, Journalof Finance, Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 1147-1170.

Lease, R., McConnell, J., Mikkelson, W. (1984) The Market Value of Differential Voting Right in Closely HeldCorporations, Journal of Business, Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 443-467.

Leech, D. (1988) The Relationship between Shareholding Concentration and Shareholder Voting Power in British Companies: a Study of the Application of Power Indices for Simple Games, Management Science, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp.509-527.

McCahery, J., Renneboog, L., Ritter, P., Haller, S. (2003) The Economics of the Proposed European TakeoverDirective, CEPS research report.

Milnor, J., and L. Shapley (1978) Values of Large Games II: Oceanic Games. Mathematics of Operations Research,Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 290-307.

Muus, C. (1998) Non-Voting Shares in France: An Empirical Analysis of The Voting Premium, Working Paper Series:Finance & Accounting, Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität, Frankfurt am Main.

Nenova, T. (2003) The Value of Corporate Voting Rights and Control: A Cross-Country Analysis, Journal of FinancialEconomics, Vol. 68, No. 3, pp. 325-351.

Nicodano, G. (1998) Corporate Groups, Dual-Class Shares and the Value of Voting

Rights, Journal of Banking andFinance, Vol. 22, No. 9, pp. 1117-37.

Robinson, C., Rumsey, J., White, A. (1995) The Value of a Vote in the Market for Corporate Control, Working Paper,York University, York.

Rydqvist, K. (1987) Empirical Investigation of the Voting Premium, Working Paper No. 35, North-Western University.

Rydqvist, K. (1992) Dual-Class Shares: A Review, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 8, pp. 45-57.

Rydqvist, K. (1996) Takeover Bids and the Relative Prices of Shares That Differ in Their Voting Rights, Journal ofBanking and Finance, Vol. 20, No. 8, pp. 1407-25.

Securities Market (1998) Puzzles of the Russian Preferred Shares. Securities Market, Vol. 4.

Securities Market (2001a) Preferred Shares – the Third Wave of Rally. Securities Market, Vol. 6.

Securities Market (2001b) In the Expectation of Record Dividends, Securities Market, Vol. 8.

Seligman, J. (1986) Equal Protection in Shareholder Voting Rights: The One-Share-One-Vote Controversy, GeorgeWashington Law Review, Vol. 54, pp. 687-724.

Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. (1997) A Survey of Corporate Governance, Journal of Finance, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 737-783.

Smith, B., and Amoako-Adu, B. (1995) Relative Prices of Dual Class Shares. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 223-239.

Stoll, H., and Whaley, R. (1983) Transaction Costs and the Small Firm Effect, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.12, No. 1, pp. 57-79.

Willer, D. (1997) Corporate Governance and Shareholder Rights in Russia, Center for Economic Performance Working Paper No. 343.

Wooldridge, J. (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Zingales, L. (1994) The Value of the Voting Right: A Study of the Milan Stock Exchange Experience, The Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 125-148.

Zingales, L. (1995) What Determines the Value of Corporate Votes? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 110, No. 4, pp. 1047-1073.