Social rewards in science and economic growth

Carillo, Maria Rosaria and Papagni, Erasmo (2007): Social rewards in science and economic growth.

Abstract

In this paper we put forward a model of basic research and long-run economic growth in which the incentives of social reward to scientific work may produce increasing returns and multiple equilibria. The state organizes production of new knowledge - a public good that improves firms' technology - with taxes on the private sector. Scientists compete with one another to attain priority over a discovery and be awarded both a real prize and prestige in the scientific community. Also, scientists\ derive job motivation from dedication to science which provides social status. Analysis of the model shows, on the one hand, a low equilibrium where the economy is endowed with a small science sector, researchers have high relative income but low prestige, and competition for discoveries is weak. On the other hand, there is a high equilibrium where the economy has a large science sector, scientists obtain for new findings high prestige but lower relative salaries and, as the effect of creative destruction is strong, there is fierce competition among researchers. Comparative statics shows that if the scientific infrastructure is poor, policies that increase the marginal benefits from a discovery have perverse effects, while policies aimed at improving the selection mechanism of researchers work well. \ The same policies have opposite effects at the high steady state.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Institution: University of Naples II
• Language: English
• Keywords: Social reward; basic research; economic growth
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General

References

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >Adams J. D. (1990) Fundamental Stocks of Knowledge and Productivity Growth, Journal of Political Economy, 98, 673-702.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Aghion P., M. Dewatripont, and J. C. Stein (2005) Academic Freedom, Private-sector Focus, and the Process of Innovation, W. P. no. 11542, NBER.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Aghion P. and P. Howitt (1992), A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction, Econometrica, 60, 323-51.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Aizenman J., and I. Noy, (2006), Prizes for Basic Research- Human Capital,Economic Might and the Shadow of History, NBER working paper No. 12226.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Arrow K. J. (1962), Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention, in The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 609-25.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Bekar, C. and R. G. Lipsey (2001), Science, Institutions, and the Industrial Revolution, mimeo.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Ben-David J. (1980), U. S. science in international perspective, Scientometrics, 2, 411-421.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Box S. and S. Cotgrove (1966), Scientific Identity, Occupational Selection, and Role Strain, The British Journal of Sociology, 17.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Carraro C. and D. Siniscalco, (2003) Science versus profit in research, in Journal of the European Economic Association, 1, 576-590.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Carillo M.R., E. Papagni and F. Capitanio (2006), Effects of social interactions on scientists' productivity, mimeo, University of Naples.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Cole H., G. J. Mailath, and A. Postlewaite (1992), Social Norms, Savings Behavior, and Growth, \QTR{it}{Journal of Political Economy}, 100, 1092-1125.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Cole S. and J. Cole (1967), Scientific Output and Recognition: a Study in the Operation of the Reward System in Science, American Sociological Review, 32, 377-390.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Cole S. and J. Cole (1973), Social Stratification in Science, University of Chicago press, Chicago.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Cole S. and T. J. Phelan (1999), The Scientific Productivity of Nations, Minerva, 37, 1-23.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Coleman J. (1990), Foundations of Social Theory, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Cooper B., C. Garcia-Pignalosa, and P. Funk (2001), Status Effects and Negative Utility Growth, \QTR{it}{The Economic Journal, 111, 642-665.}

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Corneo G., and O. Jeanne (2001), Status, the Distribution of Wealth, and Growth, \QTR{it}{Scandinavian Journal of Economics},103, 283-293.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Cotgrove, S. (1970), The Sociology of Science and Technology, The British Journal of Sociology, 21, 1-15.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Crane D. (1965), Scientists at Major and Minor Universities: a Study of Productivity and Recognition, American Sociological Review, 30, 699-715.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Dasgupta P. and P. A. David (1987), Information Disclosure and the Economics of Science and Technology, in G. Feiwell (ed.) Arrow and the Ascent of Modern Economic Theory, London, Macmillan Press, 519-42.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Dasgupta P. and P. A. David (1994), Toward a New Economics of Science, Research Policy, 23, 487-521.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}David P. A. (1998) Communication Norms and the Collective Cognitive Performance of ''Invisible Colleges'', in G. Barba Navaretti, P. Dasgupta, K.-G. Maler and D. Siniscalco (eds.) Creation and Transfer of Knowledge, Berlin, Springer-Verlag.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Diamond A., (1998), What is a Citation Worth?, Journal of Human Resources, 21, 200-215.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Drori, G. (1993) The Relationship between Science, Technology, and the Economy of Lesser Developed Countries, Social Studies of Science, 23, 201-215.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Fershtman C., K. M. Murphy, and Y. Weiss, (1996), Social Status, Education, and Growth, \QTR{it}{Journal of Political Economy}, 104, 108-132.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Fox M. F. (1983), Publication productivity among scientists: a critical review, Social Studies of Science, 13, 285-305.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Fulton O. and M. Trow (1974), Research activity in American Higher Education, Sociology of Education, 47, 29-73.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Gaston J. (1978), The Reward System in British and American Science, New York, John Wiley.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Grandmont J. M., (1985), On endogenous competitive business cycles, \QTR{it}{Econometrica}, 53, 995-1045.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Grossman G. M. and E. Helpman (1991), Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, Cambridge, MIT Press.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Helpman E. (ed.) (1998), General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth, Cambridge, MIT Press.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Horsley, M., G. Martin and G. Woodburne, (2005) Salary relativities and the academic labour market, OVAL Research Centre, University of Technology, Sydney.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Howitt, P. (2000), The Economics of Science and the Future of Universities, 16$^{th}$ Timlin Lecture, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Lazear E. P. (1997) Incentives in Basic Research, Journal of Labor Economics, 15, S167-S197.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Mansfield E. (1991) Academic Research and Industrial Innovation, Research Policy, 20, 1-12.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Mansfield E. (1995) Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations: Sources, Characteristics and Financing, Review of Economics and Statistics, LXXVII, 55-65.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Medio A. and Raines B., (2007), Backward dynamics in economics. The inverse limit approach, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control\QTR{it}{, }31, 1633-1671.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Merton R. K. (1957), Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science, American Sociological Review, 22, 635-59.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Merton R. K. (1973), The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, Chicago University Press.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Mokyr J. (2005), Long term economic growth and the history of technology, in the Handbook of Economic Growth, P. Aghion and S. Durlauf (eds.), Forthcoming.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Nelson R. R. (1959) The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research, Journal of Political Economy, 67, 549-83.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Ong L.L and J. D. Mitchell (2000) Professors and hamburgers: an international comparison of real academic salaries, Applied Economics, 32, 869-876.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Raup D. (1986), The Nemesis Affair: A Story of the Death of Dinosaurs and the Ways of Science, New York Free Press.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Romer P. M. (1990) Endogenous Technological Change, Journal of Political Economy, 98, 71-102.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Rosenberg N. and L. E. Birdzell, Jr. (1986), How the West Grew Rich: The Economic Transformation of the Industrial World, Basic Books.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Rosenberg N. and L. E. Birdzell, Jr. (1990), Science, Technology and the Western Miracle, Scientific American, 263, 42-54.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Schofer E., (2004), Cross-national Differences in the Expansion of Science, 1970-1990, Social Forces, 83, 215-248.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Shell K. (1967), A Model of Inventive Activity and Capital Accumulation, in K. Shell (ed.), Essays on the Theory of Optimal Economic Growth, Cambridge, The MIT Press.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Shell K. (1969), Toward a Theory of Inventive Activity and Capital Accumulation, American Economic Review, , 62-68.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Stephan P. E. (1996), The Economics of Science, Journal of Economic Literature, XXXIV, 1199-1235.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Stephan P. E. and S. G. Levin (1992), How Science is Done; Why Science is Done, in Striking the Mother Lode in Science: The importance of era, Place and Time, New York, Oxford University Press, 11-24.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Stern S., (2004) Do scientists pay to be scientists?, \QTR{it}{Management Science},

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Tuckman H. P. (1976), Publication, Teaching and the Academic Reward Structure, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Stevens, P. (2004) Academic salaries in the UK and the US, National Institute of Economic Research, N$o.$190,104-113.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Weiss, Y. and C. Fershtman (1998), Social Status and Economic Performance: a Survey, European Economic Review, 42, 801-820.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Ziman J. (1994) \QTR{it}{Prometheus Bound: Science in a Dynamic Steady State}, New York, Cambridge University Press.

059<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" et="thebibliography" >\QIT{\QBI{}{}}Zuckerman H. (1992), The Proliferation of Prizes: Nobel Complements and Nobel Surrogates in the Reward System of Science, Theoretical Medicine, 13, 217-231.

038<p type="texpara" tag="Body Text" >\newpage