Mis-allocation of student teacher ratio, class size and per student expenditure leads to the wastage of school resource inputs and lower academic achievement: an issue of resource management

Dahar, Muhammad Arshad and Dahar, Rashida Ahmad and Dahar, Riffat Tahira (2009): Mis-allocation of student teacher ratio, class size and per student expenditure leads to the wastage of school resource inputs and lower academic achievement: an issue of resource management.

Abstract

This study was conducted to find out the impact of student teacher ratio, class size and per student expenditure on the academic achievement of students at secondary stage in Punjab (Pakistan). Student teacher ratio, class size and per student expenditure are very important school resource inputs. The lesser student teacher ratio and class size, and the higher per student expenditure are very effective for producing higher level of academic achievement; however, it depends upon their proper allocation among schools. Population of the study comprised all secondary and higher secondary schools, secondary teachers and secondary students in Punjab. Overall, a total of 288 schools, then 20 students and 10 teachers from each school were randomly selected as the sample of the study. The study identified the student teacher ratio and class size through school profile proforma. The longitudinal data of academic achievement in the form of aggregate marks of the annual examinations of the Classes VI, VII, & VIII as prior achievement and that of the Class X as academic achievement of the same students through “Result Sheet”. The data were summarized at school level and then analyzed collectively. Stepwise Regression analysis with linear function was used to find out the differential impact of student teacher ratio and class size on the academic achievement. The study found that there is much variation and misallocation in student teacher ratio, class size and per student expenditure among schools. The study found that misallocation of student teacher ratio, class size and per student expenditure leads to the wastage of resources and lower level of academic achievement. Reduction in student teacher ratio and class size, and addition in per student expenditure are very expensive; therefore, policy can be decided considering the funds constraints. However, allocation of student teacher ratio, class size and per student expenditure can be equalized within the scarce funds. This equal allocation of these resource inputs may lead to the effective use of school resource inputs and produce higher level of academic achievement.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: prior achievement; student teacher ratio,; class size,; per student expenditure; academic achievement
• Subjects: M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M0 - General

References

Achilles, C.M., Nye, B.A., & Zaharias, J.B. (1995). Policy use of research results: Tennessee’s Project Challenge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

Ahmad, M. (1993). Identification and Analysis of Educational and Socio-economic Factors affecting the Standards of Education: A Research Study of Secondary Schools in Karachi West and Central Districts. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Institute of Education and Research (IER), University of Karachi, Pakistan.

Akram, N., Padda, I. H., & Khan, M. (2009). The Long Term Impact of Health onEconomic Growth in Pakistan. Pakistan Development Review, 48(4).

Alderman, H., Orazem, P., & Paterno, E. (2001). School Quality, School Cost, and the Public/Private School Choices of Low-Income Households in Pakistan. Journal of Human Resources. 36: pp. 304-326.

Angrist J., & Lavy, V. (1999). Using Maimonides’ rule to estimate the effect of class size on scholastic achievement. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), pp. 533–575. Available at http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0033-5533%28199905% 29114%3A2%3C533%3 AUMRTET%3E2.0.CO%3B2-3

Benbow, J. (Ed.D.), Mizrachi, A., Oliver, D., & Said-Moshiro, L. (2007). Large Class Sizes in the Developing Countries: What Do We Know And What Can We Do? Educational Quality Improvement Program, Classroom, Communities, Schools & USAID. American Institutes for Research under the EQUIP LWA.

Biggs, J.B. (1999). Teaching for Quality Learning in University. Buckingham: Society for Research in Higher Education and Open University Press.

Blatchford, P., & Mortimore, P. (1994). The issue of class size in schools what can we learn from research? Oxford Review of Education. 204, pp. 411-428.

Bonesrønning, H. (2003): Class Size Effects on Student Achievement in Norway: Patterns and Explanations. Southern Economic Journal 69 (4), pp. 952-965.

Coleman, J., Campbell, E., Hobson, C., McPartland, J., Mood, A., Weinfield, F., & York, R. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: US Gov¬ernment Printing Office.

Dahar, M.A., Dahar, R.A., Iqbal, M.Z. & Faize, F.A. (2010). Impact of Per Pupil Expenditures on the Academic Achievement of Students at the Secondary Stage in Pakistan. International Journal of Finance and Economics, Issue 52 (2010). pp. 124-135, ISSN: 1450-2887.

Dahar, M.A., Iqbal, M.Z. & Dahar, R.A. (2009). Impact of Per Pupil Expenditures on the Academic Achievement of Students at the Secondary Stage in Punjab (Pakistan). MPRA Paper No. 19844 (working paper), posted 08, January 2010. Retrieved February 7, 2010 from: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/19844/

Dahar, M.A., Faize, F.A. & Niwaz, A. (2010). A Study of the University College of Education Chiniot with Reference to Total Quality Management. European Journal of Social Sciences. Vol. 16(4), pp. 511-525, ISSN: 1450-2267.

Dahar, M.A., Faize, F.A., Niwaz, A., Hussain, M.A. & Zaman, A. (2010). Relationship between the Leadership Styles and Academic Achievement at the Secondary Stage in Punjab. International Journal of Academic Research, Vol. 2(6), pp. 459-462, ISSN-Print: 2075-4124, E-ISSN: 2075-7107.

Dahar, M.A., Faize, F.A., Niwaz, A. & Tahira, R, (2010). Deficient Level of the Availability and the Use of School Resource Inputs leads to their wastage and the lower level of Student Achievement: An Issue of Resource Management. Proceedings (published papers) of the 3rd International Conference on Assessing Quality in Higher Education ICAQHE, 2010, Modeling in Higher Education, 6th to 8th December, 2010. pp. 362-378. Lahore: University of the Punjab.

Eide, E., & Showalter, M. (1998). The Effect of School Quality on Student Performance: A Quantile Regression, Approach. Economics Letters, 58, pp. 345–350.

Finn, J.D., & Achilles. C.M. (1999). Tennessee’s class size study: Findings, implications, misconceptions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(2), pp. 97-109.

Fuller, B., & Clarke, P. (1994). Raising School Effects While Ignoring Culture? Local Conditions and the Influence of Classroom Tools, Rules and Pedagogy. Review o f Educational Research, 64, pp. 19 - 57.

Government of Pakistan (2002a). Education Sectors Reforms. Islamabad: Ministry of Education. Graddy, K., & Stevens, M. (2003). The Impact of School Inputs on student Performance: An Empirical Study of Private Schools in the United Kingdom. Discussion Paper Series. Oxford: Department of Economics, University of Oxford.

Greenwald, R., Larry, V., & Laine, R.D. (1996). The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), pp. 361-396. Retrieved February 12, 2007, from JSTOR database.

Guryan, J. (2000). Does Money Matter? Regression Discontinuity Estimates from Education Finance Reform in Massachusetts. NBER Working Paper 8269. Chicago: University of Chicago.

Hanushek, E.A. (1989a). The impact of differential expenditures on school Performance. Educational Researcher, 18(4), pp. 45-65.

Hanushek, E.A. (1989b). Expenditures, Efficiency, and Equity in Education: The Federal Government's Role. American Economic Review, 79(2), pp. 46-51.

Hanushek, E.A. (1994). Money might matter somewhere: A response to Hedges, Laine, and Greenwald. Educational Researcher, 23, pp. 5-8.

Hanushek, E.A. (1995). Interpreting recent research on schooling in developing countries. The World Bank Research Observer, 10(2), pp. 27-246.

Hanushek, E.A. (1996a). A More Complete Picture of School Resource Policies. Review of Educational Research, Vol.66, No. 3, pp. 397-409. Retrieved January 23, 2007, from JSTOR database.

Hanushek, E.A. (1996b). School Resources and Student Performance. In Gary Burtless, (ed.), Does Money Matter? The Efect of School Resources on Student Achievement and Adult Success. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution, pp. 43-73.

Hanushek, E.A. (1998). The evidence on class size. Occasional Paper 98 (1), Institute of Political Economy, University of Rochester. Retrieved February 12, 2008 from www.jstor.org/stable/3590138

Hanushek, E.A. (2003). The failure of input-based schooling policies. The Economic Journal 113(485), F64-F98.

Hanushek, E.A. (2006). School Resources. In Handbook of the Economics of Education. Vol. 2, Chap.14, p.3, 39. Stanford University: National Bureau of Economics.

Hedges, L.V., Laine, R.D., & Greenwald, R. (1994a). Does money matter? A meta-analysis of studies of the effects of differential school inputs on student outcomes. Educational Researcher, 23(3), pp. 5-14.

Hedges, L.V., Laine, R.D. and Greenwald, R. (1994b). Money does matter somewhere: a reply to Hanushek. Educational Researcher, 23, pp. 9-10.

Jin, L. & Cortazzi, M. (1999). The culture the learner brings: a bridge or barrier. In M. Byram & M. Fleming (Eds.), Language learning in intercultural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kang, Ch. (2007). Does Money Matter? The Effect of Private Educational Expenditures on Academic Performance. Working Paper No. 0704. Singapore: National University of Singapore, Department of Economics. Retrieved February 15, 2008 from http://prof.cau.ac.kr/~ckang/papers/Private%20 Tutoring%20-%20Bounds.pdf

Klein, F. (1985). The master teacher as curriculum leader. Elementary School Journal, 86(1), pp. 35-43.

Krueger, A. (1999). Experimental estimates of education production func¬tions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), pp. 497–532.

Krueger A. & Whitmore, D. (2001). The effect of attending a small class in the early grades on college-test taking and middle school test results: evi¬dence from project STAR. Economic Journal, 111(468), pp. 1–28.

Lee, J.W. & Barro, R.J. (1998). Schooling Quality in a Cross Section of Countries. Development Discussion Paper No. 659. Harvard, MA: Harvard Institute for International Development, Harvard University.

Levacic, R. et al (2005). Estimating the Relationship between School Resources and Pupil Attainment at Key Stage 3: Report to Dfes January 2005. London: University of London, Institute of Education.

Lindahl, M (2005). Home versus school learning: a new approach to esti¬mating the effect of class size on achievement. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 107(2), pp. 375–394.

Lips, D., Watkins, Sh.J., & Fleming, J. (2008). Does Spending More on Education Improve Academic Achievement? Backgrounder, No. 2179. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation.

Maier, P., Molnar, A., Percy, S., Smith, P., & Zahorik, J. (1997). First-year results of the Student Achievement Guarantee in Education program. Milwaukee, WI: Centre for Urban Initiatives and Research, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.

Michaelowa, K. (2001). Primary education quality in francophone sub-Saharan Africa: Determinants of learning achievement and efficiency considerations, World Development 10, pp. 1699-1716.

Mitchell, D., Carson, Ch., & Badarak, G. (1989). How Changing Class Size Affects Classrooms and Students. Riverside, CA: California Educational Research Cooperative, University of California.

Molnar, A., Smith, P., & Zahorik, J., et al (1998). 1997-98 Evaluation Results of the SAGE Program, Milwaukee, WI: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.

Molnar, A., Smith, P., Zahorik, J., Palmer, P., Halbach, A., & Ehrle, K. (2000). Wisconsin’s Student Achievement Guarantee in Education (SAGE) Class size Reduction Program: Achievement Effects, Teaching and Classroom Implications. National Research Center on Education in the Inner Cities Review, 9(2), pp. 12-13.

Mosteller, F. (1995). The Tennessee study of class size in early grades. The Future of Children, 5(2), pp. 113-127 Nye, B., Hedges, L.V., & Konstantopoulos, S. (1999). The long-term effects of class size: A five year follow-up of the Tennessee class size experiment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 21(2), pp. 12 7-42.

Pritchett, L. (2004). Towards a New Consensus for Addressing the Global Challenge of the Lack of Education. Working Papers 43, Center for Global Development.

Rivkin, S.G., Hanushek, E.A. & Kain, J.F. (2000). Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement. Working Paper No. 6691 (revised). Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Researh.

Tan, J., Lane, J., & Coustere, P. (1997). Putting Inputs to Work in Elementary Schools: What Can Be Done in the Philippines? Economic Development and Culture Change, Vol. 45, No.4, pp. 857-879. Retrieved January 24, 2007, from JSTOR database.

Tow, Ch., (2006). The Effects of School Funding on Student Academic Achievement: A study of California School Districts 2000-2004. Berkeley: University of California.

Wößmann, L. (2003). How does East Asia achieve its high educational Performance? Kiel, Germany: Kiel Institute for World Economics.

Word, E., Johnston, J., Bain, H. P., Fulton, D. B., Boyd-Zaharias, J., Lintz, M. N., Achilles, C. M., Folger, J., & Breda, C. (1990). Final Report: Student/teacher achievement ratio (STAR): Tennessee’s K-3 class size study. Nashville, TN: Tennessee State Department of Education. Retrieved February 12, 2007 from http://www.heros¬inc.org.