Critical import supply elasticities and the ‘imports-as-market-discipline’ hypothesis

Zimmerman, Paul R. and Carlson, Julie A. (2010): Critical import supply elasticities and the ‘imports-as-market-discipline’ hypothesis.

Abstract

This paper formally examines the factors underlying how responsive imports must be to domestic prices (the ‘import supply elasticity’) in order to thwart an anticompetitive domestic price increase stemming from a merger––an issue that frequently arises in many antitrust reviews. Domestic firms face a fringe comprised of foreign firms who import their products into the domestic market. In the eyes of domestic consumers, these imports are viewed as imperfect substitutes in demand to the output produced by the domestic firms. The model is solved in terms of the ‘critical’ import supply elasticity that can then be used evaluate the ability of imports to constrain an anticompetitive price increase post-merger. Both general and linear demand specifications are considered. Numerical simulations are conducted to consider the magnitude of perturbations in the model’s exogenous parameters. Potential empirical extensions of the model are also considered.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Competitive effects; Critical loss; Market definition; Import supply elasticity
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F10 - General; L - Industrial Organization > L4 - Antitrust Issues and Policies > L40 - General

References

Bauman, Michael G. and Paul E. Godek (2006), A new look at critical elasticity, Antitrust Bulletin 51: 325-337.

Baker, Jonathan B. (2007), Market definition: An analytical overview, Antitrust Law Journal 74: 129-174.

Baker, Jonathan B. and Carl Shapiro (2008), Reinvigorating horizontal merger enforcement, in R. Pitofsky (ed.), How the Chicago school overshot the mark: The effect of conservative economic analysis on US antitrust: Oxford University Press.

Danger, Kenneth L. and H.E. Frech III (2001), Critical thinking about ‘critical loss’ in antitrust, Antitrust Bulletin 46: 339-355.

De Ghellinck, Elisabeth; Paul A. Geroski; and Alexis Jacquemin (1988), Inter-industry variations in the effect of trade on industry performance, Journal of Industrial Economics XXXVII: 1-19.

de Melo, Jamie and Shujiro Urata (1986), The influence of increased foreign competition on industrial concentration and profitability, International Journal of Industrial Organization 4: 287-304.

Carey, Catherine (1997), US import supply behavior: Evidence from the 1980s, Eastern Economic Journal 23: 139-149.

Clark, Don P.; David L. Kaserman; and John D. Mayo (1990), Barriers to trade and the import vulnerability of US manufacturing industries, Journal of Industrial Economics XXXVIII: 433-447.

Feinberg, Robert M. (1994), The relative price discipline of domestic versus foreign entry, Review of Industrial Organization, 9: 211-220.

Field, Martha K. and Emilio Pagoulatos (1998), Foreign trade elasticities and import discipline, Applied Economics 30: 105-111.

Ghosal, Vivek (2002), Potential foreign competition in US manufacturing, International Journal of Industrial Organization 20: 1461-1489.

Goldstein, Morris and Mohsin S. Kahn (1978), The supply and demand for exports: a simultaneous approach, Review of Economics and Statistics 60: 275-286.

Hanson, Pär (1992), The discipline of imports: The case of Sweden, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94: 589-597.

Harris, Barry and Joseph Simons (1989), Focusing market definition: How much substitution is necessary?, Review of Law and Economics 12: 207-226.

Huveneers, Christian (1981), Price formation and the scope for oligopolistic conduct in a small open economy, Recherches Economiques de Louvain 47: 209-242.

Jacquemin, Alexis; Elisabeth De Ghellinck; and Christian Huveneers (1980), Concentration and profitability in a small open economy, Journal of Industrial Economics XXIX: 131-144.

Katics, Michelle M. and Bruce C. Petersen (1994), The effect of rising import competition on market power: A panel data study of US manufacturing, Journal of Industrial Economics XLII: 277-286.

Katz, Michael and Carl Shapiro (2003), Critical loss: Let’s tell the whole story, Antitrust (Spring): 49-56.

Kwoka, John E. Jr. (1998), Herfindahl concentration with an import fringe and with supply constraints, Review of Industrial Organization 13: 401-407.

Langenfeld, James and Wenqing Li (2001), Critical loss analysis in evaluating mergers, Antitrust Bulletin 46: 299-337.

Levinsohn, James (1993), Testing the imports-as-market-discipline hypothesis, Journal of International Economics 35: 1-22.

Lyons, B. (1981), Price-cost margins, market structure, and international trade, in D. Currie, D. Peel, and W. Peters (eds.), Microeconomic analysis: Essays in microeconomics and economic development: Croom Helm, London.

Min, Byung (1999), Competition effects of import discipline in Korea, Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy 4: 298-316.

O’Brien, Daniel and Abraham Wickelgren (2003), A critical analysis of critical loss analysis, Antitrust Law Journal 71: 161-184.

Pugel, Thomas A. (1980), Foreign trade and US market performance, Journal of Industrial Economics XXIX: 119-129.

Scheffman, David; Malcolm Coate; and Louis Silvia (2003), Twenty years of merger guidelines enforcement at the FTC: An economic perspective, Antitrust Law Journal 73: 277-318.

Stigler, George (1940), Notes on the theory of duopoly, Journal of Political Economy 48: 521-541.

Strand, Niklas (2006), A simple critical loss test for the geographic market, Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 2: 697-707.

Thompson, Aileen J. (2002), Import competition and market power: Canadian evidence, North American Journal of Economics and Finance 13: 40-55.

Turner, Philip P. (1980), Import competition and the profitability of United Kingdom manufacturing industry, Journal of Industrial Economics XXIX: 155-166.

Weisman, Dennis L. (2006), When can regulation defer to competition for constraining market power? Complements and critical elasticities, Journal of Competition Law and Economics 2: 101-112.