Subjective Well-Being Approach to Environmental Valuation: Evidence for Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Beja Jr., Edsel L. (2011): Subjective Well-Being Approach to Environmental Valuation: Evidence for Greenhouse Gas Emissions.

Abstract

The subjective well-being approach to environmental valuation is applied to analyze the valuation of greenhouse gas emissions. Dimensions like population and income are then incorporated into the valuation to get the fairness-adjusted marginal value of emissions. The results indicate that the industrialized countries have high willingness-to-pay to reduce emissions with the United States and Japan reporting the largest figures. Developing countries differ in their valuations, albeit they are not subject to the mandatory reductions of emissions, but still the results indicate that poor countries like China and India indicate willingness to pay whereas Brazil and Mexico indicate willingness to accept payments to reduce emissions. The high willingness-to-pay indicated by the industrialized countries does not imply that they can pay off the developing countries to continue emitting as usual. However, the different modes of willingness-to-pay and willingness-to-accept of countries indicate possibilities toward the formation of an inter-group payments and transfers system to allow societies to contribute toward global reduction emissions reduction. Part of the payments from the industrial countries could be used to support global programs to change the patterns of production and consumption and accelerate the development of cleaner technologies.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Subjective well-being; happiness research; greenhouse gas emissions; environmental valuation
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I30 - General; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q51 - Valuation of Environmental Effects; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D60 - General

References

Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R., 2004. Inequality and Happiness: Are Europeans and Americans Different?, Journal of Public Economics, 88(9-10), 2009-2042

Andrews, F.M., Robinson, J. P., 1991. Measures of Subjective Well-Being, in Robinson, J. P. , Shaver, P. R., Wrightsman, L. S. (Eds.), Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 61-114

Baranzini, A., Goldemberg, J. Speck, S. 2000. A Future of Carbon Taxes, Ecological Economics, 32(3): 395-412

Boyce, J. K., Riddle, M., 2007. Cap and Divide: How to Curb Global Warming While Protecting the Incomes of American Families, Working Paper No. 150, Amherst, MA: Political Economy Research Institute

Brenner, M., Riddle, M, Boyce, J. K., 2007. A Chinese Sky Trust?: Distributional Impacts of Carbon Charges and Revenue Recycling in China, Energy Policy, 35(2): 1771-1784

Cantril, H., 1965. The Pattern of Human Concerns, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press Cardenas, M., Mejia, C., Di Maro, V., 2009. Education and Life Satisfaction: Perception or Reality, in Graham, C., Lora, E., (Eds.), Paradox and Perception: Measuring Quality of Life in Latin America, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, pp. 192-226

Carroll N., Frijters, P., Shields, M. A., 2009. Quantifying the Costs of Drought: New Evidence from Life Satisfaction Data, Journal of Population Economics 22(2): 445-61.

Costa, P., McCrae, R., 1988. Personality in Adulthood: A Six-year Longitudinal Study of Self-Reports and Spouse Ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4): 853-863

Deaton, A., Fortson, J., Tortora, R., 2010. Life (Evaluation), HIV/AIDS, and Death in Africa,” in Diener, E., Helliwell, J. F., Kahneman, D. (Eds.), International Differences in Well-Being, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 105-136

Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R., 2006. Some Uses of Happiness Data in Economics, Journal of Economic Perspectives 20(1): 25-46

Diener, E., 1984. Subjective Well-Being, Psychological Bulletin, 95(3): 542-575

Diener, E., Biswas-Diener, R., 2008. Happiness: Unlocking the Mysteries of Psychological Wealth, Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing

Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., 1985. The Independence of Positive and Negative Affect, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(5): 71-75

Diener, E., Seligman, M. E. P., 2004. Beyond Money: Toward an Economy of Well-Being, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1): 1-31

Diener, E., Suh, E. M., 1999. National Differences in Subjective Well-Being” in Kahneman, D., Diener, E., Schwartz, N. (Eds.), Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, New York, NY: Sage Publications, pp. 434-450

Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., Griffin, S., 1985. The Satisfaction with Life Scale, Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1): 71-75

Diener, E., Kahneman, D., Tov, W., Arora, R., 2010. Income’s Association with Judgments of Life Versus Feelings, in Diener, E., Helliwell, J. F., Kahneman, D. (Eds.), International Differences in Well-Being, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 3-15

Ekman, P., Davidson, R., Friesen, W., 1990. The Duchenne Smile: Emotional Expression and Brain Physiology II, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(2): 342-353

Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., Gowdy, J. M., 2007. Environmental Degradation and Happiness, Ecological Economics, 60(3), 509-516

Ferreira, S., Moro, M., 2010. On the Use of Subjective Well-Being Data for Environmental Valuation, Environmental and Resource Economics, 46(3): 249-273

Frey, B. S., Stutzer, A., Luechinger, S., 2010. Life Satisfaction Approach to Environmental Valuation, Annual Review of Resource Economics, 2(October): 139-160

Frijters P., van Praag, B. M. S., 1998. The Effects of Climate on Welfare and Well-Being in Russia, Climatic Change 39(1): 61-81

Graham, C., 2010. Adaptation Amidst Prosperity and Adversity: Insights from Happiness Studies around the World, World Bank Research Observer, forthcoming

Helliwell, J. F., 2006. Well-being, Social Capital, and Public Policy: What’s New?, Economic Journal, 116(510): C34-C45

Helliwell, J. F., Barrington-Leigh, C., Harris, A., Huang, H., 2010. International Evidence on the Social Context of Well-Being, in Diener, E., Helliwell, J. F., Kahneman, D. (Eds.), International Differences in Well-Being, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 291-327

Inglehart, R., Klingemann, H. D., 2000. Genes, Culture, Democracy, and Happiness, in Diener, E., Suh, E. M. (Eds.), Culture and Subjective Well-Being, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 165-183

Kahneman, D., Deaton, A., 2010. High Income Improves Evaluation of Life but Not Emotional Well-Being, Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, forthcoming

Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., 2006. Developments in the Measurement of Subjective Well-being, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1): 3-24.

Kahneman, D., Sugden, R., 2005. Experienced Utility as a Standard of Policy Evaluation, Environmental and Resource Economics 32(1): 161-181

Larsen, R. J., Fredrickson, B. L., 1999. Measurement Issues in Emotion Research, in Kahneman, D., Diener, E., Schwarz, N. (Eds.), Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 40-60.

Larsen, R. J., Prizmic, Z., 2008. Regulation of Emotional Well-Being: Overcoming the Hedonic Treadmill, in Eid, M., Larsen, R. J. (Eds.), The Science of Subjective Well-Being, New York, NY: Guilford Press, pp. 258-289

Levinson, A., 2009. Valuing Public Goods Using Happiness Data: The Case of Air Quality, Working Paper No. 15156, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research

Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., Suh, E., 1996. Discriminant Validity of Well-Being Measures, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3): 616-628

Luechinger, S., 2009. Valuing Air Quality Using the Life Satisfaction Approach, Economic Journal 119(536): 482-515

Luechinger, S., Raschky, P. A., 2009. Valuing Flood Disasters Using the Life Satisfaction Approach, Journal of Public Economics, 93(3-4): 620-633

Lykken, D., 1999. Happiness: What Studies on Twins Show Us About Nature, Nurture, and the Happiness Set-Point, New York, NY: Golden Books

Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., Diener, E., 2005. The Benefits of Frequent Positive Affect: Does Happiness Lead to Success, Psychological Bulletin, 131(6): 803-855

Pavot, W., Diener, E., Colvin, C. R., Sandvik, E., 1991. Further Validation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale: Evidence for the Cross-Method Convergence of Well-Being Measures, Journal of Personality Assessment, 57(1): 149-161

Sandvik, E., Diener, E., Seidlitz, L. 1993. Subjective Well-Being: The Convergence and Stability of Self-Report and Non-Self-Report Measures, Journal of Personality, 61(3): 317-342

Schkade, D., Kahneman, D., 1998. Does Living in California Make People Happy? A Focusing Illusion in Judgments of Life Satisfaction, Psychological Science, 9(5): 340-346

Spash, C., 2002. Greenhouse Economics: Value and Ethics, London, UK: Earthscan

Stutzer, A., Frey, B. S., 2006. Does Marriage Make People Happy, or Do Happy People Get Married?, Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(2): 326-347

Stutzer, A., Frey, B. S., 2010. Recent Advances in the Economics of Individual Subjective Well-Being, Working Paper No. 1520, Basel, Switzerland: Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Basel

van Praag, B. M. S., Baarsma, B. E., 2005. Using Happiness Surveys to Value Intangibles: The Case of Airport Noise, Economic Journal, 115(500): 224-246

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., Tellegen, A., 1988. Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scale, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6): 1063-1070

Welsch, H., 2007. Environmental Welfare Analysis: A Life Satisfaction Approach, Ecological Economics 62(3-4): 544-551

Welsch, H., Kühling, J., 2009. Using Happiness Data for Environmental Valuation: Issues and Applications, Journal of Economic Surveys, 23(2): 385-406