Fumagalli, Andrea and Lucarelli, Stefano (2006): Basic income sustainability and productivity growth in cognitive capitalism: a first theoretical framework. Published in: Quaderni di Dipartimento di Economia e Metodi Quantitativi No. 183
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_27987.pdf Download (223kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper aims at proposing a first theoretical framework for studying the basic income sustainability. We consider the basic income not only as a tool of a policy to improve living standards and social well-being but, mostly, as the essential requisite to introduce a new stable compromise between capital and labour. Following the French Regulation School approach, we assert that the social compromise between capital and labour is founded on the redistribution of the productivity gains. Therefore we try to trace living standards and social well being problems back to their origins, i.e. the productivity growth. We think that describing the dynamics of productivity means understanding the main features of the contemporary capitalistic production. We first present a survey about BI in economic literature. We then focus on the socio-economic transformation of western countries and propose the term cognitive capitalism (CC) to describe the economic system after the Fordism paradigm crisis, highlighting the strong links between the exploitation of knowledge and the accumulation of surplus. Therefore we investigate the presence of a new type of Kaldor-Verdoorn law in cognitive capitalism (a virtuous circle among BI, increasing productivity - via knowledge and network externalities - output and employment). As a result, we first point out the ambiguous growth circle of the contemporary capitalism. Secondly we highlight that BI is compatible with the new way of accumulation, based on the exploitation of dynamic scale economies. BI increases productivity, through network (externalities) and learning processes and, at the same time, demand, via consumption level. This double result is not always guaranteed. It depends, on one side, on how much BI positively affects productivity, and the greater this probability, the lower the role played by intellectual property rights and the higher the diffusion of network economies (general intellect and social cooperation); on the other side, it depends on the way BI is financed. These results also depend on the assumption of closed economy, in which financial markets play no role at all.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Basic income sustainability and productivity growth in cognitive capitalism: a first theoretical framework |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | basic income, productivity, cognitive capitalism, crisis, Regulation School; Fordism; Post-fordism; knowledge; learning; externalities;, Kaldor-Verdoorn law; general intellect |
Subjects: | I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J24 - Human Capital ; Skills ; Occupational Choice ; Labor Productivity |
Item ID: | 27987 |
Depositing User: | Stefano Lucarelli |
Date Deposited: | 08 Jan 2011 20:12 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 16:33 |
References: | Aa.Vv. La Democrazia del Reddito Universale, Roma, Manifestolibri, 1997 Aglietta M. A Theory of Capitalist Regulation: the US Experience, London: NLB, 1979 (first published in French 1976). Postface à la réédition de Régulation et crise du capitalisme, Edition Ocile Jacob, Paris, 1997. 19 Atkinson A.B. Incomes and the Welfare State, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995 a Public Economics in Action. The Basic Income/flat Tax Proposal, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1995 b Atkinson, A.B. Morgensen, G.V. (ed.) Welfare and Work Incentives. A North European Perspective, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1993 Boyer R. “Technical change and the theory of regulation” in Dosi et al. 1988. Théorie de la regulation. 1.Les fondamentaux, La Decouverte, Paris 2004 a. The future of economic growth, Edwar Elgar, Northampton (MA), 2004 b. Bowles S. Is Income Security Possible in a Capitalistic Society? An Agency-Theoretic Analysis of an Unconditional Income Grant, in European Journal of Political Economy, vol. 8, pp. 557-578, 1992 Donzelli F. Il concetto di equilibrio nella teoria neoclassica, La Nuova Italia Scientifica, Roma, 1986. Dosi G. “Sources , Procedures, and Microeconomics Effects of Innovation” in Journal of Economic Literature, vol. XXVI, n.3, 1988. Dosi G., Freeman C., Nelson R., Silveberg G., Soete L. (ed.) Technical change and economic theory, Pinter, London, 1988. Fumagalli A. e Lazzarato M. (ed.) Tute Bianche. Disoccupazione di Massa e Reddito di Cittadinanza, DeriveApprodi, Roma, 1999. Fumagalli A. Moneta e tecnologia: le istituzioni instabili dell’economia capitalistica, Franco Angeli, Milano 1995. Ten Proposition on Basic Income, Basic Income in a Flexible Accumulation System, BIEN Congress, 2000 - http://www.etes.ucl.ac.be/BIEN/Archive/Congress/Berlin2000.htm Bioeconomics, labor flexibility and cognitive work: the unequal exchange, USBIG Congress, 2002, http://www.usbig.net/papers/047-Fumagalli-bioeconomics.doc Lo spazio come esternalità in via di estinzione: terziarizzazione e lavoro cognitivo, S.I.E. - XLVI riunione annuale, Napoli 2005, http://www.sie.unian.it/incontri/rsa46/papers/L1-02.pdf. Gorz A. Misères du présent, richesse du possible, Galilée, Paris, 1997. Groot L. Basic Income and Unemployment, Thela Thesis, 1999 Unemployment and Basic Income, Kloower, 2001 Groot L., Peeters H. A Model of Conditional and Unconditional Social Security in an Efficiency Wage Economy: The Economic Sustainability of a Basic Income, in Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, n. 19, pp. 573-597, 1997 20 Kaldor N. Causes of the Slow Rate of Economic Growth of the United Kingdom: an Inaugural Lecture, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1966. “Growth and Verdoorn Law: a comment on Mr Rowthorn’s article”, Economic Journal, vol. 85, 1975. Kesenne S. The Unemployment Impact of a Basic Income, Report 93/286, 1993 Kuhn A. The structure of scientific revolution, 2°Ed, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1962. Layard, L. Nickel, S. Jackman, R. Unemployment: Macroeconomic Performance and the Labor Market, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1991 Lipietz A. Behind the Crisis, the Exaustion of a Regime of Accumulation. A «Regulation School» Perspective on some French Empirical Works, in «Review of Radical Political Economy», vol. XVIII, n.1-2, 1986. Maddison A. The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective, Development Centre Studies, Paperback, 2002. Malerba F. et al. History-Friendly Models of Industry Evolution: The Computer Industry, Industrial and Corporate Change, 8(1): 3-40, 1999. Marx K. Grundrisse, Vintage, New York, 1973; or. ed. Grundrisse der Kritik der Politischen Ökonomie, Dietz, Berlin 1953. McCombie J., Pugno M., Soro B. (ed.) Productivity Growth and Economic Performance. Essays on Verdoorn’s Law, Palgrave Macmillan, 2002. Moulier Boutang Y. Capitalism cognitf et nouvelles formes de codification du rapport salarial, in Vercellone C. (sous la direction de), Sommes-nous sortis du capitalisme industriel?, La Dispute, Paris 2003. Negri A. Marx oltre Marx. Quaderno di lavoro sui Grundrisse, Feltrinelli, Milano 1979 - Eng. Trans. Marx Beyond Marx: Lessons on the Grundrisse, New York: Autonomedia, 1991. Nelson R.R. e Romer P.M. Sciences, economic growth and public policy, in Dale Neef, G. Anthony Siesfeld e Jacqueline Cefola (a cura di), The economic impact of knowledge, Butterworth/Heinemann, Boston, 1998, p. 43-59. Panzieri R. Plusvalore e pianificazione, “Quaderni Rossi”, 1964, 4 - Eng. Trans. Surplus value and planning. The Labour Process & Class Strategies, London 1976 Pasinetti L.L. Critique of the Neoclassical Theory of Growth and Distribution, «bnl Quarterly Review», I iii, 215, 2000. Serati M. Reddito di Cittadinanza: Un’opportunità o una Trappola Insidiosa per l’Occupazione? Una Verifica Empirica per il Caso Italiano, in Lunghini, G. Silva, F. Targetti-Lenti, R. (edited by), Op. Cit., 2001 Tronti M. Operai e capitale, Einaudi, Torino 1971 - partially translated in English on http://www.geocities.com/cordobakaf/index.html Van der Linden B. Basic Income and Unemployment in a Unionised Economy, Ires, working paper n. 9714, Université de Louvain, 1987 Van Parijs P. Arguing for Basic Income, Verso, London, 1992 Real Freedom For All . What (If Anything) Can Justify Capitalism, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996 Basic Income for All, Boston Review, 2000 - www.artsci.wustl.edu/~anderson/ introethics/ vanparijs.htm Basic Income: A Simple and Powerful Idea for the 21st Century, paper presented at the ‘Real Utopias’ conference, 2002 - www.etes.ucl.ac.be/BIEN/Files/Papers/ 2000VanParijs.pdf Verdoorn P.J. Fattori che regolano lo sviluppo della produttività del lavoro, in «L’Industria», vol. 1, 3-10, 1949; reprinted in English as chapter 2 of Mc Combie J., Pugno M. and Soro B. (edited by) 2002. Winter S. “Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological Regimes” in Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, vol. 5, pp. 287-320, 1984. Zanini A. e Fadini U. Lessico postfordista, Feltrinelli, Milano, 2001; Introduction, translated in English by Arianna Bove, http://www.generation-online.org/t/postfordismo.htm |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/27987 |