Government Size and Macroeconomic Stability: Sub-National Evidence from China

Li, Cheng (2010): Government Size and Macroeconomic Stability: Sub-National Evidence from China.

Abstract

Both theoretical predictions of Keynesian view and a large body of empirical studies on developed countries suggest that business cycle fluctuations can be partially smoothed by counter-cyclical fiscal policies. Our paper extends this strand of literature by considering the nexus between output fluctuations and government size in the context of Chinese fiscal federalism. Using a sample of 29 Chinese provinces for the period of 1994-2007, we fail to provide consistent evidence for the stabilizing effect of fiscal policies. In particular, we find that under the tax assignment system (fen shui zhi), neither the central government’s fiscal transfers nor the provincial budgetary and extra-budgetary revenues help reduce economic volatility. Such results are shown to be robust across different model specifications, volatility measures and estimation techniques.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: business cycles; government size; fiscal federalism; China
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E32 - Business Fluctuations ; Cycles; H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies

References

Andrés, Javier, Rafael Doménech, and Antonio Fatás. 2008. The stabilizing role of government size. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 32(2): 571-593.

Brandt, Loren, and Xiaodong Zhu. 2000. Redistribution in a decentralized economy: Growth and inflation in China under reform. Journal of Political Economy 108 (2): 422-439.

Breusch, Trevor, and Adrian Pagan. 1980. The LM test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Review of Economic Studies 47(1): 239-254.

Debrun, Xavier, Jean Pisani-Ferry, and André Sapir. 2008. Government size and output volatility: Should we forsake automatic stabilization? Economic Papers 316 (April):1-70.

Fatás, Antonio and Ilian Mihov. 2001. Government size and automatic stabilizers: International and intranational evidence. Journal of International Economics 55(1): 3-28.

Galí, Jordi. 1994. Government size and macroeconomic stability. European Economic Review 38(1): 117-132.

Gong, G.ang and Justin Yifu Lin. 2008. Deflationary expansion: An overshooting perspective to the recent business cycle in China. China Economic Review 19(1): 1-17.

Imai, Hiroyuki. 1996. Explaining China’s business cycles. The Developing Economics 34(2):154-185.

Krugman, Paul. 1991. Geography and trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Laurenceson, James, and Corrine Dobson. 2008. China’s business cycles since 1979: A chronology and comparative analysis. East-Asia Economic Research Group Discussion Paper, No.17. School of Economics, University of Queensland, Brisbane.

Lin, Justin Yifu, Fang Cai, and Zhou Li. 2003. The Chinese miracle, development strategy and economic reform. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.

Ma, Jun and John Norregaard. 1998. China’s fiscal decentralization. Unpublished manuscript.

Malik, Adeel, and Jonathan R.W. Temple. 2009. The geography of output volatility. Journal of Development Economics 90(2): 163-178.

Naughton, Barry. 2009a. Understanding the Chinese stimulus package. China Leadership Monitor 28: 1-12.

Naughton, Barry. 2009b. China’s emergence from economic crisis. China Leadership Monitor 29: 1-10.

Oppers, S. Erik. 1997. Macroeconomic cycles in China. IMF Working Paper, WP/97/135.

Qian, Yingyi. 2000. The process of China’s market transition (1978-98): The evolutionary, historical, and comparative perspectives. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 156(1): 151-180.

Qian, Yingyi, and Barry R. Weingast. 1996. China’s transition to markets: Market -preserving federalism, Chinese style. Journal of Policy Reform 1: 149-185.

Rodrik, Dani. 1998. Why do more open economies have bigger governments? Journal of Political Economy 106(5): 997-1032.

van den Noord, Paul. 2000. The size and role of automatic fiscal stabilizers in the 1990s and beyond. OECD Economic Department Working Papers, No.230, OECD Publishing.

Wang, Shaoguang, and Angang, Hu. 2001. The Chinese economy in crisis: State capacity and tax reform. M. E. Sharpe.

Wei, Yehua Dennis. 2000. Regional development in China: States, globalization, and inequality. Routledge.

Yang, Dali. 2004. Economic transformation and state rebuilding in China. In Holding China together: Diversity and national integration in the post-Deng era, edited by Barry Naughton and Dali Yang, 120-145. Cambridge University Press.

Zhang, Leyin. 1999. Chinese central-provincial fiscal relationships, budgetary decline and the impact of the 1994 fiscal reform: An evaluation. China Quarterly 157(March):115-141.

Zhang, Yan, and Liutang, Gong. 2005.The Fenshuizhi reform, fiscal decentralization, and economic growth in China. Jingjixue Jikan (China Economic Quarterly) 5(1): 75-108.

Zhang, Yin, and Guanghua, Wan. 2005. China’s business cycles: Perspectives from an AD-AS model. Asian Economic Journal 19(4): 445-469.

Zhang, Tao, and Hengfu Zou. 1998. Fiscal decentralization, public spending, and economic growth in China. Journal of Public Economics 67(2): 221-240.