Yang, ChunLei and Yao, Lan (2011): Ellsberg Paradox and Secondorder Preference Theories on Ambiguity: Some New Experimental Evidence.

PDF
MPRA_paper_28531.pdf Download (235kB)  Preview 
Abstract
We study the twocolor problem by Ellsberg (1961) with the modification that the decision maker draws twice with replacement and a different color wins in each draw. The 5050 risky urn turns out to have the highest risk conceivable among all prospects including the ambiguous one, while all feasible color distributions are meanpreserving spreads to one another. We show that the wellknown secondorder sophisticated theories like MEU, CEU, and REU as well as Savage’s firstorder theory of SEU share the same predictions in our design, for any firstorder risk attitude. Yet, we observe that substantial numbers of subjects violate the theory predictions even in this simple design.
Item Type:  MPRA Paper 

Original Title:  Ellsberg Paradox and Secondorder Preference Theories on Ambiguity: Some New Experimental Evidence 
English Title:  Ellsberg Paradox and Secondorder Preference Theories on Ambiguity: Some New Experimental Evidence 
Language:  English 
Keywords:  Ellsberg paradox, Ambiguity, Secondorder risk, Secondorder preference theory, Experiment 
Subjects:  D  Microeconomics > D8  Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81  Criteria for DecisionMaking under Risk and Uncertainty C  Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9  Design of Experiments > C91  Laboratory, Individual Behavior 
Item ID:  28531 
Depositing User:  Lan YAO 
Date Deposited:  01. Feb 2011 19:32 
Last Modified:  30. Dec 2015 09:26 
References:  Becker, G. M., M. H. DeGroot, and J. Marschak (1964): “Measuring Utility by a Single Response Sequential Method,” Behavioral Science, 9, 226–232. Camerer, C., and M. Weber (1992): “Recent Developments in Modeling Preferences: Uncertainty and Ambiguity,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 32537. CasadesusMasanell, R., P. Klibanoff, and E. Ozdenoren (2000): “Maxmin Expected Utility over Savage Acts with a Set of Priors,” Journal of Economic Theory, 92, 35–65. Chen, H., N. Ju, and J. Miao (2009): “Dynamic Asset Allocation with Ambiguous Return Predictability,” http://people.bu.edu/miaoj/portfolio57.pdf Chew, S. H., E. Karni, and Z. Safra (1987): “Risk Aversion in the Theory of Expected Utility with RankDependent Probabilities,” Journal of Economic Theory, 42, 370–381. Chow, C. C., and R. K. Sarin (2002): “Known, Unknown and Unknowable Uncertainties,” Theory and Decision, 52, 127–138. Eichberger, J., and D. Kelsey (2009): “Ambiguity”, in P. Anand, P. Pattanaik and C. Puppes (eds.), Handbook of Rational and Social Choice, OUP. Ellsberg, D. (1961): “Risk, Ambiguity and the Savage Axioms,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 643669. Ergin, H., and F. Gul (2009): “A Subjective Theory of Compound Lotteries,” Journal of Economic Theory, 144, 899929. Fox, C. R., and A. Tversky (1995): “Ambiguity Aversion and Comparative Ignorance,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 585603. Gilboa, I., and Schmeidler, D. (1989): “Maxmin Expected Utility with a NonUnique Prior,” Journal of Mathematical Economics 18, 141153. Halevy, Y. (2007): “Ellsberg Revisited: An Experimental Study,” Econometrica, 75, 503536. Halevy, Y., and V. Feltkamp (2005): “A Bayesian Approach to Uncertainty Aversion,” Review of Economic Studies, 72, 449–466. Hansen, L.P. (2007): “Beliefs, Doubts and Learning: The Valuation of Macroeconomic Risk,” American Economic Review 97, 11441152. Hansen, L.P., and T.J. Sargent (2008): “Fragile Beliefs and the Price of Model Uncertainty,” http://economics.uchicago.edu/pdf/hansen2_052506.pdf . Harrison, G. W., and E. E. Rutstrom (2008): “Risk Aversion in Experiments,” Research in Experimental Economics, 12, 41196. Heath, C., and A. Tversky (1991): “Preference and Belief: Ambiguity and Competence in Choice under Uncertainty,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 4, 528. Holt, C. A., and S. K. Laury (2002): “Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects,” American Economic Review, 92, 1644–1655. Hsu, M., M. Bhatt, R. Adolphs, D. Tranel, and C.F. Camerer (2005): “Neural Systems Responding to Degrees of Uncertainty in Human DecisionMaking,” Science, 310, 16801683. Huettel, S.A., C.J. Stowe, E.M. Gordon, B.T. Warner, and M.L. Platt (2006): “Neural signatures of economic preferences for risk and ambiguity,” Neuron, 49:765–775. Ju, N. and J. Miao, (2009): “Ambiguity, Learning, and Asset Returns,” mimeo, http://idei.fr/doc/conf/tse/papers/miao.pdf. Klibanoff, P., M. Marinacci, and S. Mukerji (2005): “A Smooth Model of Decision Making under Ambiguity,” Econometrica, 73, 1849–1892. Nau, R. F. (2006): “Uncertainty Aversion with SecondOrder Utilities and Probabilities,” Management Science, 52, 136–145. Sapienza, P., L. Zingales and D. Maesripieri (2009): “Gender Difference in Financial Risk Aversion and Career Choices are Affected by Testosterone,” PNAS, 106, 1526815273. Savage, L. J. (1954): The Foundations of Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Schmeidler, D. (1989): “Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity,” Econometrica 57: 571587. Segal, U. (1987): “The Ellsberg Paradox and Risk Aversion: An Anticipated Utility Approach,” International Economic Review, 28, 175–202. Segal, U. (1990): “TwoStage Lotteries without the Reduction Axiom,” Econometrica, 58, 349–377. Seo, K. (2009): “Ambiguity and Second Order Belief,” Econometrica, 77(5), 15751605. Stecher, J., T. Shields and J. Dickhaut (2010): “Generating Ambiguity in the Laboratory,” mimeo. Weber, E. U., and E. J. Johnson (2008): “Decisions under Uncertainty: Psychological, Economic, and Neuroeconomic Explanations of Risk Preference”, In: P. Glimcher, C. Camerer, E. Fehr, and R. Poldrack (Eds.), Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain. New York: Elsevier. 
URI:  https://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/id/eprint/28531 