Breitmoser, Yves (2011): Binomial menu auctions in government formation.
Download (203kB) | Preview
In a menu auction, players submit bids for all choices the auctioneer A can make, and A then makes the choice that maximizes the sum of bids. In a binomial menu auction (BMA), players submit acceptance sets (indicating which choices they would support), and A chooses the option that maximizes his utility subject to acceptance of the respective players. Monetary transfers may be implicit, but players may also bid by offering "favors" and the like. BMAs provide a unified representation of both monetary and non-monetary bidding, which I apply to model government formation. First, I analyze general BMAs, characterize the solution under complete information and establish outcome uniqueness (for both, sealed bid and Dutch formats). Second, in case monetary transfers are possible, BMAs are shown to implement VCG mechanisms. Finally, in case transfers are impossible, BMAs extend the model of proto-coalition bargaining and are specifically applied to government formation.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Binomial menu auctions in government formation|
|Keywords:||menu auction; demand commitment; proto-coalition bargaining; VCG mechanism|
|Subjects:||C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C78 - Bargaining Theory ; Matching Theory
D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D44 - Auctions
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games
|Depositing User:||Yves Breitmoser|
|Date Deposited:||04. Feb 2011 08:01|
|Last Modified:||17. Mar 2015 22:33|
Bag, P. and Winter, E. (1999). Simple Subscription Mechanisms for Excludable Public Goods. Journal of Economic Theory, 87(1):72–94.
Baron, D. and Diermeier, D. (2001). Elections, governments, and parliaments in proportional representation systems. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(3):933–967.
Bernheim, B. and Whinston, M. (1986). Menu auctions, resource allocation, and economic influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101(1):1–31.
Bolle, F. and Breitmoser, Y. (2008). Coalition formation, agenda selection, and power. In Braham, M. and Steffen, F., editors, Power, Freedom, and Voting, chapter 10, pages 185–208. Springer.
Breitmoser, Y. (2009). Demand commitments in majority bargaining or how formateurs get their way. International Journal of Game Theory, 38(2):183–191.
Breitmoser, Y. (2010). Proto-coalition bargaining and the core. MPRA working paper.
Caruana, G., Einav, L., and Quint, D. (2007). Multilateral bargaining with concession costs. Journal of Economic Theory, 132(1):147–166.
Clarke, E. (1971). Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice, 11(1):17–33.
Diermeier, D., Eraslan, H., and Merlo, A. (2002). Coalition governments and comparative constitutional design. European Economic Review, 46(4-5):893–907.
Diermeier, D., Eraslan, H., and Merlo, A. (2003). A structural model of government formation. Econometrica, 71(1):27–70.
Diermeier, D., Eraslan, H., and Merlo, A. (2007). Bicameralism and government formation. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 2:227–252.
Diermeier, D. and Merlo, A. (2000). Government turnover in parliamentary democracies. Journal of Economic Theory, 94(1):46–79.
Gamson, W. (1961). A theory of coalition formation. American Sociological Review, pages 373–382.
Groves, T. (1973). Incentives in teams. Econometrica, 41(4):617–631.
Jehiel, P. and Moldovanu, B. (2000). Auctions with downstream interaction among buyers. RAND Journal of Economics, pages 768–791.
Jehiel, P. and Moldovanu, B. (2001). Efficient design with interdependent valuations. Econometrica, 69(5):1237–1259.
Jehiel, P., Moldovanu, B., and Stacchetti, E. (1996). How (not) to sell nuclear weapons. American Economic Review, 86(4):814–829.
Jehiel, P., Moldovanu, B., and Stacchetti, E. (1999). Multidimensional mechanism design for auctions with externalities. Journal of Economic Theory, 85(2):258–293.
Krishna, V. (2002). Auction theory. Academic press.
McKelvey, R. and Palfrey, T. (1998). Quantal response equilibria for extensive form games. Experimental Economics, 1(1):9–41.
Merlo, A. and Wilson, C. (1995). A stochastic model of sequential bargaining with complete information. Econometrica, 63(2):371–399.
Merlo, A. and Wilson, C. (1998). Efficient delays in a stochastic model of bargaining. Economic Theory, 11(1):39–55.
Montero, M. and Vidal-Puga, J. (2010). Demand bargaining and proportional payoffs in majority games. Games and Economic Behavior.
Montero, M. and Vidal-Puga, J. J. (2007). Demand commitment in legislative bargaining. American Political Science Review, 101(4):847–50.
Morelli, M. (1999). Demand competition and policy compromise in legislative bargaining. The American Political Science Review, 93(4):809–820.
Mutuswami, S. and Winter, E. (2002). Subscription Mechanisms for Network Formation. Journal of Economic Theory, 106(2):242–264.
Nash, J. (1950). The bargaining problem. Econometrica, 18(2):155–162.
Nisan, N. (2007). Introduction to mechanism design (for computer scientists). In Nisan, N., Roughgarden, T., Tardos, E., and Vazirani, V. V., editors, Algorithmic game theory, pages 209–242. Cambridge University Press.
Turocy, T. (2005). A dynamic homotopy interpretation of the logistic quantal response equilibrium correspondence. Games and Economic Behavior, 51(2):243–263.
Turocy, T. (2010). Computing sequential equilibria using agent quantal response equilibria. Economic Theory, 42(1):255–269.
Vickrey, W. (1961). Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance, 16(1):8–37.
Vidal-Puga, J. (2004). Bargaining with commitments. International Journal of Game Theory, 33(1):129–144.
Winter, E. (1994a). The demand commitment bargaining and snowballing cooperation. Economic Theory, 4(2):255–273.
Winter, E. (1994b). Non-cooperative bargaining in natural monopolies. Journal of Economic Theory, 64:202–220.