Unconventional factors of efficiency in public transport. A case study and theory.

Beria, Paolo and Grimaldi, Raffaele (2010): Unconventional factors of efficiency in public transport. A case study and theory. Published in: World Conference on Transport Research 2010 - General Proceedings (2010)

Abstract

In this paper we analyse some possible unconventional factors of efficiency in public transport. The occasion for such analysis rises from a case study in the southern Italian region of Sicily. Most of the regional bus service is here historically franchised to some local private bus companies, without tenders or any other form of competition. The structure of the network has never been planned ex-ante, as it is the result of negotiations among bus companies, local and regional authorities. Though this situation is obviously quite far from indications of the regulation theory, it results in a surprisingly efficient system, with very low unit costs. An analysis of this situation is here carried out in order to understand which factors are forcing those companies to be efficient and which problems this situation may generate. The quality and effectiveness of the offered service is also reckoned. Two factors seem to be most relevant to this results: the relatively low level of subsidies together with the fact of being private operators (rather an exception than a rule in Italy). In order to improve their efficiency, those companies also merged together but eventually split again in the last decades in order to reach a more efficient size and suggesting the presence of possible diseconomies of scale in the sector. Taking for granted that a form of regulation is needed, it is here suggested that regulatory strategies should adapt to this counterintuitive fact and not destroy the incentives already effective in the present situation. Our suggestion is to prefer medium sized tenders rather than large ones, not only for granting more contestability, but also for financial reasons.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: regulation; bus; economies of scale; public transport; tender
• Subjects: R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R4 - Transportation Economics > R40 - General; L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L92 - Railroads and Other Surface Transportation; L - Industrial Organization > L3 - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise > L33 - Comparison of Public and Private Enterprises and Nonprofit Institutions ; Privatization ; Contracting Out

References

Attard, M., Hall, D. (2003). Public transport modernisation and adjustment to EU accession requirements: the case of Malta’s buses. Journal of Transport Geography, No. 11 (2003): 13–24.

Baumol, W. J., & Bradford, O. F. (1970). Optimal departures from marginal cost pricing. American Economic Review, 60: 265–283.

Beesley, M. E., & Glaister, S. (1985). Deregulating the bus industry in Britain; A. The case for. Transport Reviews, 5: 123–142.

Beria, P., Grimaldi, R. (2010). The impact of regulatory aspects on economies and diseconomies of scale in bus industry. In: Trasporti, logistica e reti di imprese: competitività del sistema e ricadute sul territorio (Borruso, G., Danielis, R., Musso, E.). Pp. 210-216. (forthcoming publication)

Boiteaux, M. (1956). Sur la Gestions des Monopoles Publics Astreints a l’Equilibre Bugetaire. Econometrica, 24, 22–40. Buzzo Margari B., Erbetta F. (2005), Misure di efficienza statica e dinamica nel settore dei trasporti pubblici locali, HERMES, Working Paper 4.

Cambini C., Filippini M. (2003), “Competitive Tendering and Optimal Size in the Regional Bus Transportation Industry. An Example from Italy”, Annals of Public And Cooperative Economics, 74:1, pp. 163-182, BlackWeel Publishing Ltd, Oxford (UK).

Costa A. (1996). The organisation of urban public transport systems in Western European metropolitan areas. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol 30, No. 5: 349-359.

De Rus, G. and Nombela, G. (1997). Privatization of urban bus services in Spain. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 31: 115-129.

Fazioli R., Filippini M., Kunzle M. (2003), “Valutazione dell’efficienza delle compagnie di bus italiane e svizzere”, in Banca d’Italia (a cura di), L’efficienza nei servizi pubblici, Roma (Italy)

Fazioli R., Filippini M., Prioni P. (1993), “Cost structure and efficiency of local public transport: the case of Emilia Romagna bus companies”, International Journal of Transport Economics, 20, 305-324.

Giordano R. (2007), La liberalizzazione del trasporto pubblico locale: tra regole e mercato, Giordano Editore, Napoli (Italy)

Gwilliam K. (2008). A review of issues in transit economics. Research in Transportation Economics. Vol. 23: 4–22. Gwilliam, K. M., Nash, C. A., & Mackie, P. J. (1985). Deregulating the bus industry in Britain; the case against. Transport Reviews, 5(No. 2). 105–132.

Hensher, D., A. (2007). Bus Transport - Economics, Policy and Planning. Research in Transportation Economics. Volume 18, 2007, Pages xix-xxviii, 1-507.

Hensher, D. A., & Wallis, I. (2005). Competitive Tendering as a Contracting Mechanism for Subsidising Transport – the bus experience. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 39(Part 3), 295–322.

Iacono M. J. (2009), Modeling Cost Structure of Public Transit Firms: Scale Economies and Alternate Functional Forms, Transportation Research Board, 88th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers

Iseki H. (2008), Economies of scale in bus transit service in the USA: How does cost efficiency vary by agency size and level of contracting?, Transportation Research Part A, Elsevier

ISTAT (2001). 14° Censimento Generale della Popolazione e delle Abitazioni. Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (Italian National Statistics Institute). Website: http://dawinci.istat.it

Karlaftis, McCarthy (1997). Operating subsidies and performance in public transit: an empirical study. Transportation Research A, Vol. 32, No. 5: 359-375.

Kidikoro, Y. (2003). The effects of price regulation in contracting out transport services. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 37(Part 1), 111–132.

Nash, C. A. (1993). British Bus Deregulation. The Economic Journal, 103 (July), I042-I049. At Royal Economic Society I993. Published by Blackwell Publishers, io8 Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 iJF, UK and 238 Main Street, Cambridge, MA 02 I42, USA.

Obeng, K., & Azam, G. (1997). Type of management and subsidy induced distortions in urban transit firms. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, XXXI(No. 2): 193–209. OECD (2009). OECD Reviews of Regulatory Reform: Italy. OECD.

Ottoz E., Fornengo G., Di Giacomo (2005), The Impact of Ownership on the Cost of Bus Service Provision: An Example from Piedmont, HERMES Working Paper 11. Preston J. (1997), An Economic Analysis of Regulation of Urban Transport Transport in Europe. Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Working Paper 506

Preston J. (2001). Regulation policy in land passenger transportation in Europe. Paper submitted to the Seventh International Conference on Competition and Ownership in Land Passenger Transport (Thredbo 7), Molde, Norway, 25-28 June 2001.

Pucher, J., Kurth S. (1995). Verkehrsverbund: the success of regional public transport in Germany, Austria and Switzerland, Transport Policy, Vol. 2, No. 4: 279–291.

Ramsey, F. P. (1927). A Contribution to the Theory of Taxation. Economic Journal, Vol. 37: 47–61.

Regione Lombardia (2002). Nuovo sistema tariffario, Regolamento Regionale 23 Luglio 2002 – N.5

Regione Lombardia (2009). Modifiche al Regolamento Regionale 23 luglio 2002 n.5 “Nuovo sistema tariffario”.

Sohail, M., Maunder, D.A.C., Cavill, S. (2006). Effective regulation for sustainable public transport in developing countries. Transport Policy. No. 13 (2006) 177–190.

Stiglitz, J., E. (2000). Economics of the Public Sector. Third Edition edition. W. W. Norton & Company.

Talley, W. K. (1998). The indirect cost saving hypothesis of privatization. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 32(Part 3): 351–364.

Tyson, W.J. (1990), Effects of Deregulation on Service Co-ordination in the Metropolitan Areas, Journal of Transport, Economics and Policy, Vol. 24, No. 3: 283-293.

Ufficio Federale dei Trasporti (2009), “Preventivo 2008” in Indicatori TRV. Available at: www.bav.admin.ch consulted on March 2009.

van de Velde, D. (2005). Regulation and competition in the European land transport industry: recent developments. In R. Macario, J. Viegas, & D. Hensher (Eds.), Competition and ownership in public transport. Selected papers from the 9th international conference (Thredbo 9) (pp. 81–94). Lisbon: Elsevier.

van de Velde, D. (2008). A new regulation for the European public transport. Research in Transportation Economics, 22 (2008): 78–84.

van de Velde, D., Veeneman, W., Lutje Schipholt, L. (2008). Competitive tendering in The Netherlands: Central planning vs. functional specifications. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice; Vol. 42, No. 9: 1152-1162.

Viton P.A. (1998), “Changes in Multi-Mode Bus Transit Efficiency 1988-1992”, Transportation, 25, 1-21.

Yvrande-Billon, A. (2006). The attribution process of delegation contracts in French urban public transport sector: why is competitive tendering a myth. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 77(No. 4), 453–478.

Zyryanov, V. and Sanamov, R. (2001). Improving urban public operation: experience of Rostov-on-Don (Russia). Paper submitted to the Seventh International Conference on Competition and Ownership in Land Passenger Transport (Thredbo 7), Molde, Norway, 25-28 June 2001.