« Going with Coase against Coase : The Dynamic Approach to the Internalization of External Effects »

Keppler, Jan Horst (2010): « Going with Coase against Coase : The Dynamic Approach to the Internalization of External Effects ». Published in: The Economics and Finance of Sustainable Development, Economica, Paris, 2010, (2010): pp. 118-138.

Abstract

The article develops R. H. Coase’s insight that the level of transaction costs in the market determines the amount of externalities, thus providing arguments against government intervention. Contrary to Coase, however, we argue that the level of transaction costs cannot be considered as given, and that there is therefore a case for selective and innovative government intervention to reduce such transaction costs. Externalities are approached as intrinsically new and dynamic impacts, whose transaction costs diminish over time, a process that can be accelerated by appropriate government action. In contrast, internalization by means of public intervention through Pigouvian taxation is shown to be epistemologically untenable: if externalities had sufficient information content to allow governments to determine optimal tax levels, these same externalities would already have been fully internalized by the market. The final part of the article proposes two internalization strategies based on a dynamic re-interpretation of the Coasean approach. The first aims at developing feedback mechanisms between generators of externalities and those affected by them through media other than the market. The second seeks to reduce transaction costs in order to extend the domain in which markets can operate effectively by proposing codification strategies for the informational complexities characterizing externalities.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: External effects, incomplete information, environmental economics, transaction costs, codification, dynamic internalization
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D23 - Organizational Behavior ; Transaction Costs ; Property Rights; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B3 - History of Economic Thought: Individuals > B31 - Individuals; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q51 - Valuation of Environmental Effects; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy

References

Arrow, Kenneth J. (1979), “The Division of Labor in the Economy, the Polity and the Society” in Driscoll Jr., Gerald P. [1979], Adam Smith and Modern Political Economy, Ames, IO, Iowa State University Press, p. 153-164.

Arrow, Kenneth J. (1977), “The Organization of Economic Activity: Issues Pertinent to the Choice of Market versus Nonmarket Allocation” in Robert Haveman and Julius Margolis (eds.), Public Expenditure and Policy Analysis. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, p. 67-81.

Baumol, William and William Oates (1988), The Theory of Environmental Policy, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bertrand, Élodie (2006), “La thèse d’efficience du ‘théorème de Coase’: Quelle critique de la microéconomie?”, Revue économique 57(5), p. 983-1008. Coase, Ronald H., “The Nature of the Firm”, Economica, n.s. 4: 386-405, reprinted in Ronald H. Coase (1988), The Firm, the Market and the Law, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Coase, Ronald H. (1960). “The Problem of Social Cost”, Journal of Law and Economics 1(1): 1-21, reprinted in Ronald H. Coase (1988), The Firm, the Market and the Law. Chicago: Chicago University Press, p. 95-156.

Coase, Ronald H. (1988), “Notes on the Problem of Social Cost”, Coase (1988), The Firm, the Market and the Law. Chicago: Chicago University Press, p. 157-185.

Diamond, Peter A. and Jerry A. Hausman (1994), “Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8: 45-64.

Freeman, M. 1979. The Benefits of Environmental Improvements: Theory and Practice. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Keppler, Jan Horst (1991), “Wieviel Geld für wieviel Umwelt? Entschädigungskonzepte und ihre normativen Grundlagen”, Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik (Journal of Environmental Law and Policy) 91 (4), 1991, p. 397-410.

Keppler, Jan Horst (1998), “Externalities, Fixed Costs and Information”, Kyklos 52 (4): 547-563.

Keppler, Jan Horst (2008), L’économie des passions selon Adam Smith: les noms du père d’Adam, Paris: Kimé.

Ostrom, Elinor (1995), “Designing Complexity to Govern Complexity” in Susan Hanna and Mohan Munasinghe (eds.), Property Rights and the Environment: Social and Ecological Issues. Washington, DC: The Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics and The World Bank, p. 33-46. Pigou, Arthur C. (1932 (1920)), The Economics of Welfare, 4th ed. London: Macmillan.

Pommerehne, Werner W. (1978). Institutional Approaches to Public Expenditure, Journal of Public Economics. 9: 255-280. Stigler, George J. (1966), The Theory of Price, 3rd edition, New York: Macmillan.

Stigler, George J. (1988), Memoirs of an Unregulated Economist, New York: Basic Books.

Voltaire (1994), Micromégas, Zadig, Candide, Paris: Flammarion.