Chu, Angus C. and Lai, Ching-Chong and Liao, Chih-Hsing (2010): A tale of two growth engines: The interactive effects of monetary policy and intellectual property rights.
Download (6MB) | Preview
How do intellectual property rights that determine the market power of firms influence the effects of monetary policy on economic growth and social welfare? To analyze this question, we develop a monetary R&D-based growth model with elastic labor supply. We find that monetary expansion reduces growth and welfare through a decrease in labor supply that reduces R&D. Furthermore, a larger market power of firms strengthens these effects of monetary policy in the R&D model. In contrast, increasing the market power of firms dampens the growth and welfare effects of monetary policy in the AK model. Therefore, the market power of firms has drastically different implications on the welfare cost of inflation under the two growth engines (i.e., innovation versus capital accumulation). We also calibrate the two models using data in the US and the Euro Area to quantitatively evaluate and compare the welfare cost of inflation in the two economies. Finally, we simulate transition dynamics of the R&D model in order to compute the complete welfare changes from reducing inflation.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||A tale of two growth engines: The interactive effects of monetary policy and intellectual property rights|
|Keywords:||economic growth; inflation; monetary policy; patent policy; R&D|
|Subjects:||O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E41 - Demand for Money
|Depositing User:||Angus C. Chu|
|Date Deposited:||07. Apr 2011 18:48|
|Last Modified:||30. Dec 2015 20:57|
Chu, A., 2010. Effects of patent length on R&D: A quantitative DGE analysis. Journal of Economics 99, 117-140.
Chu, A., 2011. The welfare cost of one-size-fits-all patent protection. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, forthcoming.
Chu, A., and Lai, C., 2009. Money and the welfare cost of inflation in an R&D growth model. IEAS Working Paper No. 10-A003.
Dotsey, M., and Ireland, P., 1996. The welfare cost of inflation in general equilibrium. Journal of Monetary Economics 37, 29-47.
Economic Development Indicators, 2005. Growth through innovation: Sustainable economic growth for all New Zealanders. Ministry of Economic Development and the Treasury.
Evans, L., Quigley, N., and Zhang, J., 2003. Optimal price regulation in a growth model with monopolistic suppliers of intermediate goods. Canadian Journal of Economics 36, 463-474.
Funk, P., and Kromen, B., 2006. Short-term price rigidity in an endogenous growth model: Non-superneutrality and a non-vertical long-term Phillips-curve. University of Cologne Working Paper No. 29.
Funk, P., and Kromen, B., 2010. Inflation and innovation-driven growth. The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics (Topics), vol. 10, article 23.
Futagami, K., and Iwaisako, T., 2007. Dynamic analysis of patent policy in an endogenous growth model. Journal of Economic Theory 132, 306-334.
Gilbert, R., and Shapiro, C., 1990. Optimal patent length and breadth. RAND Journal of Economics 21, 106-112.
Gillman, M., and Kejak, M., 2005. Contrasting models of the effect of inflation on growth. Journal of Economic Surveys 19, 113-136.
Goel, R., and Ram, R., 2001. Irreversibility of R&D investment and the adverse effect of uncertainty: Evidence from the OECD countries. Economics Letters 71, 287-291.
Goh, A.-T., and Olivier, J., 2002. Optimal patent protection in a two-sector economy. International Economic Review 43, 1191–1214.
Gomme, P., 1993. Money and growth revisited: Measuring the costs of inflation in an endogenous growth model. Journal of Monetary Economics 32, 51-77.
Grossman, G., and Helpman, E., 1991. Quality ladders in the theory of growth. Review of Economic Studies 58, 43-61.
Ho, W., Zeng, J., and Zhang, J., 2007. Inflation taxation and welfare with externalities and leisure. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 39, 105-131.
Itaya, J., and Mino, K., 2003. Inflation, transaction costs and indeterminacy in monetary economies with endogenous growth. Economica 70, 451-470.
Itaya, J., and Mino, K., 2007. Technology, preference structure, and the growth effect of money supply. Macroeconomic Dynamics 11, 589-612.
Iwaisako, T., and Futagami, K., 2003. Patent policy in an endogenous growth model. Journal of Economics 78, 239-258.
Jha, S., Wang, P., and Yip, C., 2002. Dynamics in a transaction-based monetary growth model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 26, 611-635.
Jones, C., 1995. R&D-based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy 103, 759-784.
Jones, C., 1999. Growth: With or without scale effects. American Economic Review 89, 139-144.
Jones, C., and Williams, J., 2000. Too much of a good thing? The economics of investment in R&D. Journal of Economic Growth 5, 65-85.
Li, C.-W., 1998. Stochastic variety innovation in a growth model. University of Glasgow Working Paper No. 9818.
Li, C.-W., 2001. On the policy implications of endogenous technological progress. Economic Journal 111, C164-C179.
Lucas, R., 1988. On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics 22, 3-42.
Mansfield, E., 1980. Research and development, productivity, and inflation.” Science, Sept., 1091-1093.
Marquis, M., and Reffett, K., 1994. New technology spillovers into the payment system. Economic Journal 104, 1123-1138.
Mino, K., 1997. Long-run effects of monetary expansion in a two-sector model of endogenous growth. Journal of Macroeconomics 19, 635-655.
Mulligan, C., and Sala-I-Martin, X., 1997. The optimum quantity of money: Theory and evidence. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 29, 687-715.
Palokangas, T., 2011. Optimal patent length and breadth in an economy with creative destruction and non-diversifiable risk. Journal of Economics 102, 1-27.
Park, W., 2008. International patent protection: 1960-2005. Research Policy 37, 761-766.
Romer, P., 1986. Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 94, 1002-1037.
Romer, P., 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98, S71-S102.
Stockman, A., 1981. Anticipated inflation and the capital stock in a cash-in-advance economy. Journal of Monetary Economics 8, 387-93.
Tobin, J., 1965. Money and economic growth. Econometrica 33, 671-684.
Vaona, A., 2011. Inflation and growth in the long run: A new Keynesian theory and further semiparametric evidence. Macroeconomic Dynamics, forthcoming.
Wang, P., and Yip, C., 1992. Alternative approaches to money and growth. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 24, 553-62.
Wen, Y., 2010. Liquidity demand and welfare in a heterogeneous-agent economy. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper 2010-009.
Wu, Y., and Zhang, J., 1998. Endogenous growth and the welfare costs of inflation: A reconsideration. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 22, 465-482.
Zhang, J., 1996. A simple pecuniary model of money and growth with transactions cost. Journal of Macroeconomics 18, 127-137.
Available Versions of this Item
- A tale of two growth engines: The interactive effects of monetary policy and intellectual property rights. (deposited 07. Apr 2011 18:48) [Currently Displayed]