Sdiri, Hanen and Ayadi, Mohamed (2011): Innovation decision of Tunisian service firms: an empirical analysis.
Download (212kB) | Preview
Innovation is widely recognised as a key driver of economic growth and competitiveness. But, some works focus especially on analyzing the determinants and the effects of innovation while distinguishing between its various types (product innovation, process innovation, radical innovation and incremental innovation). The analysis of the determinants is certainly important, but few research efforts testing the way in which firms make the decision to innovate. Based on a sample of 108 Tunisian service firms, the purpose of the paper is to explain the way in which firms make the decision to innovate: simultaneous (one-stage model) or sequential (two-stage model). We find that the two-stage model has a statistically-significant advantage in predicting the innovation. In practice, the sequential model illustrates well the innovation making-decision procedures.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Innovation decision of Tunisian service firms: an empirical analysis|
|Keywords:||Innovation, Decision making, Service sector.|
|Subjects:||O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
L - Industrial Organization > L8 - Industry Studies: Services > L80 - General
|Depositing User:||Hanen SDIRI|
|Date Deposited:||13. May 2011 02:42|
|Last Modified:||15. Feb 2013 21:26|
Baldwin, J.R. and P. Hanel. (2003). Innovation and Knowledge Creation in an Open Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Becker. W and Dietz. J. (2004). “R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms-evidence for the German manufacturing industry”, Research Policy, 33: 209-223.
Brouwer, E. and A.H. Kleinknecht.(1996). “Determinants of Innovation. A Microeconometric Analysis of Three Alternative Innovation Output Indicators” dans Kleinknecht, A. (ed.), Determinants of Innovation: the Message from New Indicators. London: Macmillan and New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Cainelli. G., Evangelista. R and Savona. M. (2006). “Innovation and economic performance in services: a firm-level analysis”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30: 435-458.
Cohen, W.M. and Klepper, S. (1996). “Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: the case of process and product R&D”. Review of Economics and Statistics, 78: 232–243.
Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A. (1990). “Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation”, Administrative Science.
Crépon B., E. Duget and J. Mairesse. (1998). “Research, Innovation, and Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 7: 115-58.
Du. J, Love. J. H and Roper. S. (2007). “The innovation decision: An economic analysis”, Technovation, 27: 766-773.
Duguet. E. (2006). “Innovation height, spillovers and TFP growth at the firm level: Evidence from French manufacturing”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15: 415-442.
Gallouj. F and Weinstein. O. (1997). “Innovation in services”. Research policy, 26: 537–556.
Greene, WH. 2003. Econometric Analysis, Fifth Edition, Prentice Hall.
Hanel. P. (2004). “Innovation in the Canadian Service Sector”, Working Paper, Available online: http://pages.usherbrooke.ca/gredi/wpapers/0403ph.pdf
Kafouros. M.I., Buckley. P.J., Sharp. J.A., and Wang. C. (2008). The role of internationalization in explaining innovation performance. Technovation, 28: 63–74.
Kotabe, M., Srinivasan, S.S., Aulakh, P.S. (2002). “Multinationality and firm performance: the moderating role of R&D and marketing capabilities”. Journal of International Business Studies, 33: 79–97.
Lööf, H. and A. Heshmati. (2006). “On the Relationship between Innovation and Performance: A Sensitivity Analysis,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15: 317–344.
Mairesse, J. and Mohnen, P. (2003). “R&D and productivity: a re-examination in light of the innovation surveys”. Papier présenté à la conférence DRUID, Copenhagen, Denmark, mimeo.
Mansury. M. Ariana, Love. James H. (2008). “Innovation, productivity and growth in US business services: A firm-level analysis”. Technovation, 28: 52-62.
Mohnen. P and Therrien. P. (2005). “Comparing the Innovation Performance in Canadian, French and German Manufacturing Enterprises”, working paper 2005-028.
OCDE. (2005). « Principes directeurs pour le recueil et l’interprétation des données sur l’innovation » Troisième édition.
Paul, M., Planes, B., Huiban, J.P., Sevestre, P. (2000). “Externalisation or Spillovers ? R&D Activity Components and the Firm Performances”, Communication à la journée de travail UMR/ERUDITE, Changement technique, innovation et espace, 20 mars, Dijon.
Raymond. L and St-Pierre. J. (2010). “R&D as a determinant of innovation in manufacturing SMEs: An attempt at empirical clarification”, Technovation, 30: 48–56.
Roper. S and Dundas. H.N. (2004). “Innovation, Networks and the Diffision of Manufacturing Best Practice: A Comparison of Nothern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland”, working paper, Available online: http://www.innlab.org/document/roper%20and%20hd%201998.pdf
Schumpeter J.A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Sirilli. G and Evangelista. R. (1998). “Technological innovation in services and manufacturing: results from Italian surveys”, Research Policy, 27: 881–899.
Sdiri. H, Ayadi. M and Moez. E. (2010). “Innovation and Performance: an Empirical Study of Tunisian Service Firms”, Journal of Innovation and Business Best Practices, 9 pages, Volume 2010 (2010), Article ID 492128.
Sundbo and Gallouj. (1998). “Innovation as a loosely coupled system in services”. SI4S Topical Paper N 4. Oslo: STEP Group.