Political competition in hard times

Zudenkova, Galina (2011): Political competition in hard times.

Abstract

This paper analyzes a spatial model of political competition between two policy-motivated parties in hard times of crisis. Hard times are modeled in terms of policy-making costs carried by a newly elected party. The results predict policy divergence in equilibrium. If the ideological preferences of parties are quite diverse and extreme, there is a unique equilibrium in which the parties announce symmetric platforms and each party wins with probability one half. If one party is extreme while the other is more moderate, there is a unique equilibrium in which the parties announce asymmetric platforms. If the preferred policies of the parties are not very distinct, there are two equilibria with asymmetric platforms. An important property of equilibrium with asymmetric platforms is that a winning party necessarily announces its most preferred policy as a platform.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Spatial model; Political competition; Two-party system; Policy-motivated parties; Hard times; Crisis.
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior

References

Alesina, A., 1988. Credibility and Policy Convergence in a Two-Party System with Rational Voters. American Economic Review, 78, 796-805.

Banks, J.S., 1990. A Model of Electoral Competition with Incomplete Information. Journal of Economic Theory, 50, 309-325.

Besley, T., S. Coate, 1997. An Economic Model of Representative Democracy. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 85-114.

Calvert, R. L., 1985. Robustness of the Multidimensional Voting Model: Candidate Motivations, Uncertainty, and Convergence. American Journal of Political Science, 29, 69-95.

Downs, A., 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

Feddersen, T.J., I. Sened, S.G. Wright, 1990. Rational Voting and Candidate Entry under Plurality Rule. American Journal of Political Science, 34, 1005-1016.

Osborne, M.J., A. Slivinski, 1996. A Model of Political Competition with Citizen-Candidates. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 65-96.

Palfrey, T.R., 1984. Spatial Equilibrium with Entry. Review of Economic Studies, 51, 139-156.

Roemer, J.E., 1994. A Theory of Policy Differentiation in Single Issue Electoral Politics. Social Choice and Welfare, 11, 355-380.

Wittman, D., 1977. Candidates with Policy Preferences: A Dynamic Model. Journal of Economic Theory, 14, 180-189.

Wittman, D., 1983. Candidate Motivation: A Synthesis of Alternative Theories. American Political Science Review, 77, 142--157.

Wittman, D., 1990. Spatial Strategies when Candidates have Policy Preferences. In: Enelow, J., Hinich, M. (Eds.), Advances in the Spatial Theory of Voting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.