Azmat, Hayat (2010): Schlock economics.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_31238.pdf Download (113kB) | Preview |
Abstract
After the collapse of USSR, Communism came to an end in 1990 and Capitalism emerged alone as the only feasible way to organize a modern economy. But the recent financial crisis which erupted in the US and spread almost in the entire globe proved Capitalism as well a failed economic system. Laissez Faire/Non intervention in the market which is the essence of capitalism was the reason for the current financial crisis. The hegemonic west propagates the rules of capitalism through the subject of economics. The professional job of economist is either to create new models or extend the existing one which always gives misleading results for understanding the ground realities of the Universe. For more than 100 years this tradition was unable to give a single solid discovery. Since there is no concept of intervention in the economic affairs of individuals as well as states therefore immoral and unfair practices are used without any hesitation for running the affairs of business. Ground reality exhibits that the science of economics can claim neither scientific laws nor universal truths. In short there is utmost need for reassessing the entire academy of mainstream Economics.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Schlock economics |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Errors in capitalism, Unreal, irrelevant and schlock Economics |
Subjects: | A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A13 - Relation of Economics to Social Values C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0 - General > C00 - General |
Item ID: | 31238 |
Depositing User: | Azmat Hayat |
Date Deposited: | 02 Jun 2011 13:27 |
Last Modified: | 09 Oct 2019 16:36 |
References: | Gilpin, R (2001), Understanding the International Economic Order: Global Political Economy, Princeton and Oxford, Princeton University Press. Hernando, D.S (2003), The mystery of Capital: Why capitalism triumph in the west and failed everywhere else. Zaman, A. (2009). Causal Relations via Econometrics”, Social Science Research Network. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1374208 Joseph stiglitz, Globalization and its Discontents, Allen Lane, London, 2002, pp. 6-8. Lawson, T. (1997). Economics and Reality. London: Routledge. Todaro P M and Stephan S.C (2010), Economic Development”, Eight Edition P 13. The Addison-Wesley Publishers. Lawson T (2009), Contemporary economics and the crisis: real-world economics review, issue no. 50. Cambridge University, UK GERRING, J (2007). Review of Julian Reiss’s Error in economics: Towards a more evidence-based methodology. London: Routledge, pp 272. (Boston University). Frey, B.S.(2001) 'Why economists disregard economic methodology', Journal of Economic Methodology, 8: 1, 41 — 47. Joseph P. D and VanHoose D.D (2006), Global Economic issues and Policies. Thomson Sout Western publisher PP 206. Bukhari S, Divine will (Al-Qadar), Volume 8, Book 77 Hadith 611. Keith S, Global thought leader, Real Insights and authority. Available at www.Global-Directions.com S. Akbar Zaidi, Issues in Pakistan’s Economy, Oxford University Press (PP 181) Abdul H.D & Mian M .A, Islamic Economics. Publisher Ilmi Kitab Khana. Mufti Mohammad Taqi Usmani, “Islam and Modern Business and Economics, published by Quranic studies publishers (www.quranicstudiespublishers.com). THOMAS MALTHUS AND THE MAKING OF THE MODERN WORLD Alan Macfarlane Various issues of different newspapers and blogs of scholars |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/31238 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Schlock economics. (deposited 02 Jun 2011 13:27) [Currently Displayed]