A model of technological progress in the microprocessor industry

Pillai, Unni (2011): A model of technological progress in the microprocessor industry.

Abstract

This paper develops a model of technological progress in the microprocessor industry that connects the seemingly disparate engineering and economic measures of technological progress. Technological progress in the microprocessor industry is driven by the repeated adoption of higher quality vintages of capital equipment produced by the upstream semiconductor equipment industry. The model characterizes the optimal adoption decision of a microprocessor firm and the resulting rate of technological progress. In conjunction with parameters estimated using a new dataset of the microprocessor industry, the model suggests explanations for the acceleration in technological progress during 1990-2000 and the subsequent slowdown.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Technology Adoption, Microprocessors
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives; L - Industrial Organization > L6 - Industry Studies: Manufacturing > L63 - Microelectronics ; Computers ; Communications Equipment

References

Aizcorbe, Ana, “Moore’s Law, Competition, and Intel’s Productivity in the Mid-1990s,” American Economic Review, May 2005, 95 (2), 305–308. and Samuel Kortum, “Moore’s Law and the Semiconductor Industry: A Vintage Model,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, December 2005, 107 (4), 603–630.

Aizcorbe, Ana, Stephen D. Oliner, and Daniel E. Sichel, “Shifting trends in semiconductor prices and the pace of technological progress,” Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2006-44, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.) 2006. Balcer, Yves and Steven A. Lippman, “Technological expectations and adoption of improved technology,” Journal of Economic Theory, December 1984, 34 (2), 292–318.

Berglund, C. Neil, “A Unified Yield Model Incorporating Both Defect and Parametric Effects,” IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, August 1996, 9 (3), 447–454. Blackwell, David, “Discounted Dynamic Programming,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1965,36, 226–235.

Borkar, Shekhar, “Design Challenges of Technology Scaling,” IEEE Micro, 1999, 19 (4), 23–29.

Condon, Stephanie, “Intel to Invest $7 Billion in U.S. Manufacturing Facilities,” CNET, February 10 2009. http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578 3-10160368-38.html.

Dixit, Avinash K. and Robert S. Pindyck, Investment under Uncertainty, Princeton University Press, 1994.

Doraszelski, Ulrich, “The net present value method versus the option value of waiting: A note on Farzin, Huisman and Kort (1998),” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, August 2001, 25 (8), 1109–1115.

Farzin, Y. H., K. J. M. Huisman, and P. M. Kort, “Optimal timing of technology adoption,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, May 1998, 22 (5), 779–799.

Flamm, Kenneth, “Moores Law and the Economics of Semiconductor Price Trends,” in Dale W. Jorgenson and Charles W. Wessner, eds., Productivity and Cyclicality in Semiconductors: Trends, Implications, and Questions Report of a Symposium, National Academies Press 2004, pp. 151–170.

Goettler, Ronald and Brett Gordon, “Competition and Innovation in the Microprocessor Industry: Does AMD spur INTEL to innovate more?,” Working Paper 2009. Gordon, Brett R., “A Dynamic Model of Consumer Replacement Cycles in the PC Processor Industry,” Marketing Science, September 2009, 28 (5), 846–867.

Gordon, Robert J., “Technology and Economic Performance in the American Economy,” NBER Working Papers 8771, National Bureau of Economic Research February 2002.

Griliches, Zvi, “Hybrid Corn: An Exploration in the Economics of Technological Change,” Econometrica, 1957, 25 (4), 501–522.

Hoppe, Heidrun C., “The Timing of New Technology Adoption: Theoretical Models and Empirical Evidence,” Manchester School, January 2002, 70 (1), 56–76. Hulten, Charles R., “Growth accounting with intermediate inputs,” The Review of Economic Studies, October 1978, 45, 511–518.

Hutcheson, Dan, “The R&D Crisis,” Technical Report, VLSI Research, Santa Clara 2005.

Jorgenson, Dale W., “Information Technology and the U.S.Economy,” American Economic Review, 2001, 91 (1), 1–32.

Moore, Gordon E., “Cramming More Components onto Integrated Circuits,” Electronics, April 1965, 38 (8). Moore, Gordon E., “Progress in Digital Integrated Electronics,” IEEE, IEDM Technical Digest, 1975, pp. 11– 13.

Nordhaus,William D., “The Progress of Computing,” Discussion Paper 1324, Cowles Foundation 2001.

Oliner, Stephen D. and Daniel E. Sichel, “Information technology and productivity: where are we now and where are we going?,” Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2002-29, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.) 2002. , “The Resurgence of Growth in the 1990s: Is Information Technology the Story?,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2002, 2000 (14), 3–22.

Oliner, Stephen D. and Daniel E. Sichel, and Kevin J.Stiroh, “Explaining a Productive Decade,” Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2007-63, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.) 2007.

Pakes, Ariel and Paul McGuire, “Computing Markov-Perfect Nash Equilibria: Numerical Implications of a Dynamic Differentiated Product Model,” RAND Journal of Economics, Winter 1994, 25 (4), 555–589.

Ronen, Ronny, Avi Mendelson, Konrad Lai, Shih-Lien Lu, Fred Pollack, and John P. Shen, “Coming Challenges in Microarchitecture and Architecture,” Proceedings of the IEEE, 2000, 89 (3), 325–340.

Semiconductor-International, “VLSI Research Ranks Top Equipment Vendors for 2007,” www.semiconductor.net/article/CA6541940.html, 2008. Stokey, Nancy L, Robert E Lucas, and Edward Prescott, Recursive Methods in Economic Dynamics, Harvard University Press, 1989.

Sutton, John, Technology and Market Structure: Theory and History, Vol. 1 of MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, December 2001.