Levy Subordinator Model: A Two Parameter Model of Default Dependency

Balakrishna, B S (2010): Levy Subordinator Model: A Two Parameter Model of Default Dependency.

Abstract

The May 2005 crisis and the recent credit crisis have indicated to us that any realistic model of default dependency needs to account for at least two risk factors, firm-specific and catastrophic. Unfortunately, the popular Gaussian copula model has no identifiable support to either of these. In this article, a two parameter model of default dependency based on the Levy subordinator is presented accounting for these two risk factors. Subordinators are Levy processes with non-decreasing sample paths. They help ensure that the loss process is non-decreasing leading to a promising class of dynamic models. The simplest subordinator is the Levy subordinator, a maximally skewed stable process with index of stability 1/2. Interestingly, this simplest subordinator turns out to be the appropriate choice as the basic process in modeling default dependency. Its attractive feature is that it admits a closed form expression for its distribution function. This helps in automatic calibration to individual hazard rate curves and efficient pricing with Fast Fourier Transform techniques. It is structured similar to the one-factor Gaussian copula model and can easily be implemented within the framework of the existing infrastructure. As it turns out, the Gaussian copula model can itself be recast into this framework highlighting its limitations. The model can also be investigated numerically with a Monte Carlo simulation algorithm. It admits a tractable framework of random recovery. It is investigated numerically and the implied base correlations are presented over a wide range of its parameters. The investigation also demonstrates its ability to generate reasonable hedge ratios.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: default risk; correlation smile; CDO; Levy process; subordinator; semi-analytical; FFT; copula; catastrophe
• Subjects: G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G13 - Contingent Pricing ; Futures Pricing

References

Albanese, C., O. Chen, A. Dalessandro, and A. Vidler (2006), ``Dynamic Credit Correlation Modeling'', Available at http://www.defaultrisk.com/pp_corr_75.htm.

Albrecher, H., S. Ladoucette, W. Schoutens (2007), ``A Generic One-factor Levy model for Pricing Synthetic CDOs'', in ``Advances in Mathematical Finance'', Birkhauser, 259-277.

Amraoui, S. and S. Hitier (2008), ``Optimal Stochastic Recovery for Base Correlation'', Available at http://www.defaultrisk.com/pp_recov_45.htm.

Andersen, L. and J. Sidenius (2004), ``Extension to the Gaussian Copula: Random Recovery and Random Factor Loadings'', Journal of Credit Risk, 1(1), pp. 29-70.

Applebaum, D. (2005), ``Lectures on Levy Processes, Stochastic Calculus and Financial Applications'', Ovronnaz, September 2005.

Balakrishna, B. S. (2007), ``Delayed Default Dependency and Default Contagion'', Available at http://www.defaultrisk.com/pp_corr101.htm.

Balakrishna, B. S. (2009), ``Levy Density Based Intensity Modeling of the Correlation Smile'', Available at http://www.defaultrisk.com/pp_cdo_63.htm.

Balakrishna, B. S. (2010), ``Levy Subordinator Model of Default Dependency'', Available at http://www.defaultrisk.com/pp_corr_39.htm.

Baxter, M. (2007). ``Levy Simple Structural Models'', in ``Credit Correlation - Life after Copulas'', Lipton and Rennie (Editors), World Scientific.

Bennani, N. (2005), ``The Forward Loss Model: A Dynamic Term Structure Approach for the Pricing of Portfolio Credit Derivatives'', http://www.defaultrisk.com/ pp_crdrv_95.htm.

Brigo, D., A. Pallavicini and R. Torresetti (2006), ``Default Correlation, Cluster Dynamics and Single Names: The GPCL dynamical loss model'', http://ssrn.com/abstract=956827.

Brigo, D., A. Pallavicini and R. Torresetti. (2010) ``Credit Models and the Crisis, or: How I learned to stop worrying and love the CDOs'', http://ssrn.com/abstract=1529498.

Chapovsky, A., A. Rennie and P. A. C. Tavares (2007), ``Stochastic Intensity Modeling for Structured Credit Exotics'', Int. Jnl. of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 10(4), pp. 633-652.

Di Graziano, G. and C. Rogers (2009), ``A Dynamic Approach to the Modeling of Correlation Credit Derivatives Using Markov Chains'', Int. Jnl. of Th. and App. Finance, 12(1), pp. 45-62.

Duffie, D. and N. Garleanu (2001), ``Risk and the Valuation of Collateralized Debt Obligations'', Financial Analysts Journal, 57, pp. 41-59.

Errais, E., K. Giesecke and L. Goldberg (2006), ``Affine Point Processes and Portfolio Credit Risk'', Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=908045.

Hull, J. and A. White (2006), ``Valuing Credit Derivatives Using an Implied Copula Approach'', Journal of Derivatives, 14(2), pp. 8-28.

Joshi, M. and A. Stacey (2005), ``Intensity Gamma: A New Approach to Pricing Credit Derivatives'', Risk Magazine, July 2006.

Krekel, M. (2008), ``Pricing Distressed CDOs with Base Correlation and Stochastic Recovery'', Available at http://www.defaultrisk.com/pp_cdo_60.htm.

Lindskog, F. and A. McNeil (2003), ``Common Poisson Shock Models: Applications to Insurance and Credit Risk Modeling'', ASTIN Bulletin, 33(2), pp. 209-238.

Overbeck, L. and W. Schmidt (2005), ``Modeling Default Dependence with Threshold Models'', Journal of Derivatives, 12(4), pp. 10–19.

Putyatin, V., D. Prieul and S. Maslova (2005), ``A Markovian approach to Modeling Correlated Defaults'', Risk Magazine, May 2005.

Schonbucher, P. (2005), ``Portfolio Losses and the Term Structure of Loss Transition Rates: A New Methodology for the Pricing of Portfolio Credit Derivatives'', Available at http://defaultrisk.com/pp_model_74.htm.

Schonbucher, P. and D. Schubert (2001), ``Copula Dependent Default Risk in Intensity Models'', Working Paper, Department of Statistics, Bonn University.

Sidenius, J., V. Piterbarg and L. Andersen (2005), ``A New Framework for Dynamic Credit Portfolio Loss Modeling'', http://www.defaultrisk.com/pp_model_83.htm.

Zolotarev, V. M. (1986), ``One-dimensional Stable Distributions'', Translations of Mathematical Monographs, vol. 65, American Mathematical Society, Providence.