Bram, Avraham and Seyhan, Eda (2011): Match of the Day: The search for a suitable spouse.
Download (295kB) | Preview
The institutions of family and marriage may seem beyond the remit of economics, involving complexities which the discipline could only ever assume away. There is, however, a significant body of research, which applies the adaptable economists’ toolbox to these areas of life, often yielding a significant degree of insight. Gary Becker’s seminal Treatise on the Family, one of the first studies to subject decisions about sex, marriage, childbearing and childrearing to economic analysis, employed concepts such as the maximisation of family, or household, utility functions to explain family collective choice, with later authors using game theoretic models to offer a different perspective on the intra-household distribution of goods. However, the well-documented phenomenon of urban areas having higher divorce rates than rural regions is not addressed by existing family economics literature, despite the importance of such trends to social policy planners. We develop a new model that provides a theoretical basis for the difference in rural and urban divorce rates, drawing on insights from labour economics and social psychology that have not previously been applied to family economics.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Match of the Day: The search for a suitable spouse|
|Keywords:||Economics; Family; Divorce|
|Subjects:||R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R0 - General > R00 - General
D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search ; Learning ; Information and Knowledge ; Communication ; Belief ; Unawareness
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J12 - Marriage ; Marital Dissolution ; Family Structure ; Domestic Abuse
|Depositing User:||Eda Seyhan|
|Date Deposited:||01. Jul 2011 15:53|
|Last Modified:||20. Feb 2013 05:45|
Becker, G. S. (1973), ‘A Theory of Marriage: Part I’ The Journal of Political Economy 81(4), 813-846 Blanchard, O. and P. Diamond (1994), ‘Ranking, Unemployment Duration and Wages’, Review of Economic Studies 61, 417-434.
Botwin, M., D.M. Buss and T.K. Shackelford (1997), ‘Personality and mate preferences: ﬁve factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction,’ Journal of Personality 65, 107-136.
Burgess, E., Locke, H. J. and Thomes, M. M. (1963), The Family from Institution to Companionship, American Books, New York.
Calhoun, A. W. (1945), A Social History of the American Family, Vol. 3, Barnes & Noble, New York.
Gautier, P. A., et al. (2009), ‘Sin City? Why is the Divorce Rate Higher in Urban Areas?’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 111(3), 439–456
Humbad, M. N., et al. (2010), ‘Is spousal similarity for personality a matter of convergence or selection?’, Personality and Individual Differences 49(7), 827-830.
Hutchens, Robert M. (1979), ‘Welfare, Remarriage, and Marital Search’, The American Economic Review 69(3), 369-379
Jalovaara, M. (2001), ‘Socio-economic Status and Divorce in First Marriages in Finland 1991–93’, Population Studies 55(2), 119–133.
McCall, J. (1970), ‘Economics of information and job search’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 84(1), 113-126.
Mortensen, D. (1970), ‘Job search, the Duration of Unemployment, and the Phillips Curve’, The American Economic Review 60(5), 505-517.
Mortensen, D. (2003), Wage Dispersion: Why are similar workers paid differently?, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
Mumford, K. and P.N. Smith (1999), ‘The hiring function reconsidered: On closing the circle’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61, 343-364
Schultz, M. (1984), ‘Divorce in Early America: Origins and Patterns in Three North-central States’, Sociological Quarterly 25 (Autumn), 511–526.
Shelton, B. A. (1987), ‘Variations in Divorce Rates by Community Size: A Test of the Social Integration Explanation’, Journal of Marriage and Family 49 (4), 827-832.
Woodrow, K., D. W. Hastings and E. J. Tu (1978), ‘Rural–urban patterns of marriage, divorce, and mortality’, Rural Sociology, 43(1), 70-86.